Abstract
To interact mechanically with the world and especially to use hand tools we exert force. However, the biomechanical consequences of force production can be challenging. In particular, due to the nonlinear kinematics of the mammalian skeleton and of typical hand tools, exerting force can destabilize posture, compromising the ability to control force. In this chapter we present a simplified analysis of this phenomenon that shows how the destabilizing effect of force production varies with pose and tool geometry, and how it may be offset by neuro-muscular stiffness. We also show that in some circumstances the limits of force production may, in fact, be due to a limited ability to produce stiffness rather than a limited ability to produce force. An experimental confirmation of these predictions is presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This may be demonstrated by a free-body analysis of the two segments of the arm.
- 2.
This is a due to the kinematics of force transmission in a serial-link mechanism such as the upper extremity.
References
Bober, T., Kornecki, S., Lehr, J. R. P., & Zawadzki, J. (1982). Biomechanical analysis of human arm stabilization during force production. Journal of Biomechanics, 15 (11), 825.
Bolhuis, B.M. van, Gielen, C.C.A.M. & Ingen Schenau, G.J. van (1998). Activation patterns of mono- and bi-articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans. Journal of Physiology, 508, 313–324.
Burdet, E., Osu, R., Franklin, D.W., Milner, T.E., & Kawato, M. (2001). The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature, 414, 446–449.
Doorenbosch, C., & Ingen-Schenau, G.J. van (1995). The role of mono- and biarticular muscles during contact control leg tasks in man. Human Movement Science, 14, 279–300.
Feldman, A. G., & Latash, M. L. (2005). Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: Recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium point hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 91–103.
Hof, A.L. (2001). The force resulting from the action of mono- and biarticular muscles in a limb. Journal of Biomechanics, 34, 1085–1089.
Hoffer, J. A. & Andreassen, S. (1981). Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. Journal of Neurophysiology, 45(2), 267–285.
Hogan, N. (1984). Adaptive-control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 29(8), 681–690.
∗Hogan, N. (1985a). Impedance control – an approach to manipulation.1. Theory. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the Asme, 107(1), 1–7.
∗Hogan, N. (1985b). The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control. Biological Cybernetics, 52(5), 315–331.
Hogan, N. (2002). Skeletal muscle impedance in the control of motor actions. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2(3&4), 359–373.
∗Hogan, N. (2006). Force control with a muscle-activated endoskeleton. In S. Kawamura & M. Svinin (Eds.), Advances in robot control: From everyday physics to human-like movements (pp. 201–216): Springer.
Ingen-Schenau, G.J. van (1989). From rotation to translation: constraints on multi-joint movements and the unique action of biarticular muscles. Human Movement Science, 8, 301–337.
Kornecki, S., & Zschorlich, V. (1994). The nature of the stabilizing functions of skeletal muscles. Journal of Biomechanics, 27 (2), 215–225.
Lieber, R.L. (1990). Hypothesis: biarticular muscles transfer moments between joints. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32, 456–458.
Milner T.E. (2002). Contribution of geometry and joint stiffness to mechanical stability of the human arm. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 515–519
Milner T.E., Cloutier C., Leger A.B., & Franklin D.W. (1995). Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness. Experimental Brain Research, 107:293–305
Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., Hogan, N., & Bizzi, E. (1985). Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(10), 2732–2743.
Ostry, D.J., & Feldman, A.G. (2003). A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 275–288.
Rancourt, D., & Hogan, N. (2001). Stability in force-production tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(2), 193–204.
Roy P.O. (1999). Étude des mécanismes de stabilisation d’une tâche de contact par le membre supérieur. Master’s thesis, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Tsuji, T., Morasso, P.G., Goto, K. & Ito, K. (1995). Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture. Biological Cybernetics, 72 (6), 475–485.
The references marked with an asterisk (∗) are specifically recommended for further introduction or background to the topic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rancourt, D., Hogan, N. (2009). The Biomechanics of Force Production. In: Sternad, D. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 629. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77063-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77064-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)