Multi-Finger Prehension: Control of a Redundant Mechanical System

  • Mark L. Latash
  • Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 629)


The human hand has been a fascinating object of study for researchers in both biomechanics and motor control. Studies of human prehension have contributed significantly to the progress in addressing the famous problem of motor redundancy. After a brief review of the hand mechanics, we present results of recent studies that support a general view that the apparently redundant design of the hand is not a source of computational problems but a rich apparatus that allows performing a variety of tasks in a reliable and flexible way (the principle of abundance). Multi-digit synergies have been analyzed at two levels of a hypothetical hierarchy involved in the control of prehensile actions. At the upper level, forces and moments produced by the thumb and virtual finger (an imagined finger with a mechanical action equal to the combined mechanical action of all four fingers of the hand) co-vary to stabilize the gripping action and the orientation of the hand-held object. These results support the principle of superposition suggested earlier in robotics with respect to the control of artificial grippers. At the lower level of the hierarchy, forces and moments produced by individual fingers co-vary to stabilize the magnitude and direction of the force vector and the moment of force produced by the virtual finger. Adjustments to changes in task constraints (such as, for example, friction under individual digits) may be local and synergic. The latter reflect multi-digit prehension synergies and may be analyzed with the so-called chain effects: Sequences of relatively straightforward cause-effect links directly related to mechanical constraints leading to non-trivial strong co-variation between pairs of elemental variables. Analysis of grip force adjustments during motion of hand-held objects suggests that the central nervous system adjusts to gravitational and inertial loads differently. The human hand is a gold mine for researchers interested in the control of natural human movements.


Normal Force Grip Force Tangential Force Elemental Variable Finger Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexandrov A, Frolov A, Massion J (1998) Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending. Exp Brain Res 118: 210–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki T, Niu X, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2006) Effects of friction at the digit-object interface on the digit forces in multi-finger prehension. Exp Brain Res 172: 425–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki T, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2007) Adjustments to local friction in multi-finger prehension. J Mot Behav 39: 276–290.Google Scholar
  4. Arbib MA, Iberall T, Lyons D (1985) Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand. In: Goodwin AW and Darian-Smith I, eds. Hand Function and the Neocortex. Berlin: Springer Verlag; pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
  5. Arimoto S, Tahara K, Yamaguchi M, Nguyen PTA, Han HY (2001) Principles of superposition for controlling pinch motions by means of robot fingers with soft tips. Robotica 19: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett KMB and Castiello U, eds (1994) Insights into the Reach to Grasp Movement. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  7. ∗Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan TS, Almdale DP, Lewis JL, Rymer WZ (1986) Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. J Neurophysiol 56: 1225–1241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan TS, Rovai GP, Rymer WZ (1989) Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow. J Neurophysiol 62: 1201–1212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Budgeon MK (2007) Prehension synergies during finger manipulation. Unpublished Master Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  11. Burstedt MK, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (1999) Control of grasp stability in humans under different frictional conditions during multidigit manipulation. J Neurophysiol 82: 2393–2405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nature Rev Neurosci 6: 720–736.Google Scholar
  13. Cesari P, Newell KM (1999) The scaling of human grip configurations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25: 927–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1987) . Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of a rapid grasp. J Neurophysiol 57: 1498–1510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1988) Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object. J Neurophysiol 60: 1513–1522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutkosky MR, Howe RD (1990) Human grasp choice and robotic grasp analysis. Venkataraman T and Iberall T, eds. Dextrous Robot Hands. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
  17. Danion F, Schöner G, Latash ML, Li S, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) A force mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force production tasks. Biol Cybern 88: 91–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edin BB, Westling G, Johansson RS (1992) Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. J Physiol 450: 547–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Einstein A (1907) On the relativity principle and the conclusions drawn from it. Yearbook of radiactivity and electronics (in German). Cited after A. Einstein, L. Infeld. The evolution of physics: from early concepts to relativity and quanta. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1938.Google Scholar
  20. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1993) Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 95: 131–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1995) The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 105: 455–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Flanders, M, Soechting JF (1990) Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 64: 1818–1837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao F; Latash ML, and Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Neural network modeling supports a theory on the hierarchical control of prehension. Neural Comput Appl 13: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao F, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2005a) Control of finger force direction in the flexion-extension plane. Exp Brain Res 161: 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gao F, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2005b) Internal forces during object manipulation. Exp Brain Res 165: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelfand IM, Latash ML (2002) On the problem of adequate language in biology. In: Latash ML (Ed.) Progress in Motor Control. vol. 2: Structure-Function Relations in Voluntary Movement. p. 209–228, Human Kinetics: Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  27. ∗Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1966) On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (Eds.) Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems, pp. 9–26, Nauka: Moscow (1966) (in Russian, a translation is available in 1971 edition by MIT Press: Cambridge MA.)Google Scholar
  28. Goodman SR, Latash ML (2006) Feedforward control of a redundant motor system. Biol Cybern 95: 271–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hershkovitz M, Tasch U, Teboulle M (1995) Toward a formulation of the human grasping quality sense. J Robot Syst 19: 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hershkovitz M, Teboulle M (1998) Sensitivity analysis for a class of robotic grasping quality functionals. Robotica 16: 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughlings Jackson J (1889) On the comparative study of disease of the nervous system. Brit Med J 17: 355–362, Aug.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2005) Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans. J Neurosci 25: 7238–7253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2004) Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol 556: 267–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56: 550–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerr JR, Roth B (1986) Analysis of multifingered hands. J Robot Res 4: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1994) Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects. J Physiol 479: 487–497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim SW, Shim JK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Anticipatory adjustments of multi-finger synergies in preparation for self-triggered perturbations. Exp Brain Res 174: 604–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kinoshita H, Kawai S, Ikuta K, Teraoka T (1996) Individual finger forces acting on a grasped object during shaking actions. Ergonomics 39: 243–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res 152: 281–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuo AD (1994) A mechanical analysis of force distribution between redundant, multiple degree-of-freedom actuators in the human: Implications for the central nervous system. Hum Move Sci 13: 635–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang CE, Schieber MH (2003) Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. J Neurophysiol 90: 1160–1170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2001) Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multi-finger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141: 153–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ∗Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002a) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exer Sport Sci Rev 30: 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002b) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146: 412–432.Google Scholar
  45. Latash ML, Shim JK, Gao F, Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Rotational equilibrium during multi-digit pressing and prehension. Motor Control 8: 392–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Latash ML, Shim JK, Smilga AV, Zatsiorsky VM (2005) A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: A physical metaphor and a neural model. Biol Cybern 92: 186–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leijnse JN, Snijders CJ, Bonte JE, Landsmeer JM, Kalker JJ, Van der Meulen JC, Sonneveld GJ, Hovius SE (1993) The hand of the musician: the kinematics of the bidigital finger system with anatomical restrictions. J Biomech 26: 1169–1179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li Z-M, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1998) Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 119: 276–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loeb E, Brown IE, Cheng EJ (1999) A hierarchical foundation for models of sensorimotor control. Exp Brain Res 126: 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacKenzie CL, Iberall T (1994) The grasping hand. Amsterdam; New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  51. Murray RM, Li Z, Sastry SS (1994) A mathematical introduction to robotic manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  52. Nakazawa N, Ikeura R, Inooka H (2000) Characteristics of human fingertips in the shearing direction. Biol Cybern. 8: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newell KM, Broderick MP, Deutsch KM, Slifkin AB. (2003) Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 29: 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nichols TR (1994) A biomechanical perspective on spinal mechanisms of coordinated muscular action: an architecture principle. Acta Anat (Basel) 151: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ohtsuki T (1981) Inhibition of individual fingers during grip strength exertion. Ergonomics 24: 21–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004a) Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, I: experimental observations. Biol Cybern 91: 148–158.Google Scholar
  57. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004b) Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, II: Modeling and optimization. Biol Cybern 91: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004c) Tangential load sharing among fingers during prehension. Ergonomics 47: 876–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2005) Viscoelastic response of the finger pad to incremental tangential displacements. J Biomech 38: 1441–1449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2007) Finger interaction during radial and ulnar deviation: Experimental data and neural network modeling. Exp Brain Res 179: 301–312.Google Scholar
  61. Prilutsky BI (2000) Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. Motor Control 4: 1–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Quaney BM, Cole KJ (2004) Distributing vertical forces between the digits during gripping and lifting: the effects of rotating the hand versus rotating the object. Exp Brain Res 155: 145–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Robertson EM (2000) Neural features of the reach and grasp. Motor Control 4: 117–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Salisbury JK, Craig JJ. (1982) Articulated hands: force control and kinematic issues. Int J Robot Res 1: 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saltiel P, Wyler-Duda K, D'Avella A, Tresch MC, Bizzi E (2001) Muscle synergies encoded within the spinal cord: evidence from focal intraspinal NMDA iontophoresis in the frog. J Neurophysiol 85: 605–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sanger TD (2000) Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superposition of principal components. J Neurosci 20: 1066–1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Santello M, Soechting JF (2000) Force synergies for multifingered grasping. Exp Brain Res 133: 457–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. ∗Schieber MH, Santello M (2004) Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol 96: 2293–2300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126: 289–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schöner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86: 29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Serina ER, Mote CD Jr, Rempel D (1997) Force response of the fingertip pulp to repeated compression—effects of loading rate, loading angle and anthropometry. J Biomech 30: 1035–1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Serina ER, Mockensturm E, Mote CD Jr, Rempel D (1998)A structural model of the forced compression of the fingertip pulp. J Biomech. 31: 639–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res 152: 173–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004a) Finger coordination during moment production on a mechanically fixed object. Exp Brain Res 157: 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shim JK, Lay B, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2004b) Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. J Appl Physiol 97: 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2005a) Prehension synergies in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 93: 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2005b) Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and principle of superposition during static prehension in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 93: 3649–3658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shim JK, Huang J, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2007) Multi-digit maximal voluntary torque production on a circular object. Ergonomics 50: 660–675.Google Scholar
  79. Smith MA, Soechting JF (2005) Modulation of grasping forces during object transport. J Neurophysiol 93: 137–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93: 609–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tresch MC, Cheung VC, d'Avella A (2006) Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 95: 2199–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226–1235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. ∗Turvey MT (1990) Coordination. Amer Psychol 45: 938–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2002) Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision prip of young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease participants. Motor Control 6: 113–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Valero-Cuevas FJ, Zajac FE, Burgar CG (1998) Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. J Biomech 31, 693–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Valero-Cuevas FJ, Towles JD, Hentz VR (2000) Quantification of fingertip force reduction in the forefinger following simulated paralysis of extensor and intrinsic muscles. J Biomech 33: 1601–1609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vereijken B, van Emmerick REA, Whiting HTA, Newell KM (1992) Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav 24: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53: 277–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yoshikawa T(1990) Foundations in Robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Yoshikawa T, Nagai K (1991) Manipulating and grasping forces in manipulation by multifingered robot hands. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 7: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zatsiorsky VM, Li Z-M, Latash ML (2000) Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 131: 187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002a) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. I. Biomechanics. Biol Cybern 87: 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002b) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. II. Control. Biol Cybern 87: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. ∗Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2004) Prehension synergies. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 32: 75–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. ∗Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML, Gao F, Shim JK (2004) The principle of superposition in human prehension. Robotica 22: 231–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2003) Prehension synergies: Effects of object geometry and prescribed torques. Exp Brain Res 148: 77–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2005) Motor control goes beyond physics: differential effects of gravity and inertia on finger forces during manipulation of hand-held objects. Exp Brain Res 162: 300–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2006) Prehension stability: Experiments with expanding and contracting handle. J Neurophysiol 95: 2513–2529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhang W, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Accurate production of time-varying patterns of the moment of force in multi-finger tasks. Exp Brain Res 175: 68–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang W, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2007) Finger synergies during multi-finger cyclic production of moment of force. Exp Brain Res 177: 243–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zuo BR, Qian WH (2000) A general dynamic force distribution algorithm for multifingered grasping. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B- Cybernetics 30: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. The references marked with an asterisk (*) are specifically recommended for further introduction or background to the topic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyRec Hall 267, The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations