Advertisement

Motor Learning and Consolidation: The Case of Visuomotor Rotation

  • John W. Krakauer
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 629)

Abstract

Adaptation to visuomotor rotation is a particular form of motor learning distinct from force-field adaptation, sequence learning, and skill learning. Nevertheless, study of adaptation to visuomotor rotation has yielded a number of findings and principles that are likely of general importance to procedural learning and memory. First, rotation learning is implicit and appears to proceed through reduction in a visual prediction error generated by a forward model, such implicit adaptation occurs even when it is in conflict with an explicit task goal. Second, rotation learning is subject to different forms of interference: retrograde, anterograde through aftereffects, and contextual blocking of retrieval. Third, opposite rotations can be recalled within a short time interval without interference if implicit contextual cues (effector change) rather than explicit cues (color change) are used. Fourth, rotation learning consolidates both over time and with increased initial training (saturation learning).

Keywords

Sequence Learning Declarative Memory Directional Error Rotation Learning Opposite Rotation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, M.C., R.A. Bjork, and E.L. Bjork, Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1994. 20(5): 1063–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brashers-Krug, T., R. Shadmehr, and E. Bizzi, Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature, 1996. 382: 252–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buch, E.R., S. Young, and J.L. Contreras-Vidal, Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learn Mem, 2003. 10(1): 55–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caithness, G., et al., Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci, 2004. 24(40): 8662–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, H.A., Aiming Error Under Transformed Spatial Mappings Suggests a Structure for Visual-Motor Maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1989. 15(3): 493–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frensch, P.A., One concept, multiple meanings: on how to define the concept of implicit learning, in Handbook of implicit learning, M. Stadler and P.A. Frensch, Editors. 1998, SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, California 91320.Google Scholar
  7. Ghez, C., et al., Spatial Representations and Internal Models of Limb Dynamics in Motor Learning, in The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd Edition), M. Gazzaniga, Editor. 2000, The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. pp. 501–514.Google Scholar
  8. Gordon, J., M.F. Ghilardi, and C. Ghez, Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res, 1994. 99(1): 97–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauptmann, B., et al., The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 2005. 24(2): 181–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinder, M.R., et al., The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter- rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res, 2007. 80(4): 629–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Imamizu, H., Y. Uno, and M. Kawato, Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 1995. 21(5): 1174–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kagerer, F.A., J.L. Contreras-Vidal, and G.E. Stelmach, Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res, 1997. 115(3): 557–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klassen, J., C. Tong, and J.R. Flanagan, Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res, 2005. 164(2): 250–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krakauer, J.W., C. Ghez, and M.F. Ghilardi, Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci, 2005. 25(2): 473–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krakauer, J.W., M.F. Ghilardi, and C. Ghez, Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci, 1999. 2(11): 1026–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krakauer, J.W., et al., Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci, 2000. 20(23): 8916–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Krakauer, J.W., et al., Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLoS Biol Sep, 2006. 4(10): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacLeod, M.D. and C.N. Macrae, Gone but not forgotten: the transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol Sci, 2001. 12(2): 148–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazzoni, P. and J.W. Krakauer, An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci, 2006. 26(14): 3642–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miall, R.C., N. Jenkinson, and K. Kulkarni, Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Exp Brain Res, 2004. 154(2): 201–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reber, P.J. and L.R. Squire, Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. Learn Mem, 1994. 1(4): 217–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Reber, P.J. and L.R. Squire, Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning. J Cogn Neurosci, 1998. 10(2): 248–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robertson, E.M., A. Pascual-Leone, and R.C. Miall, Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2004. 5(7): 576–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shadmehr, R. and T. Brashers-Krug, Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci, 1997. 17(1): 409–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, M.A., A. Ghazizadeh, and R. Shadmehr, Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning. PLoS Biol, 2006. 4(6): e179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vindras, P. and P. Viviani, Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. Journal of experimental psychology, 1998. 24: 1–23.Google Scholar
  27. Walker, M.P., et al., Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature, 2003. 425(6958): 616–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, J. and R.L. Sainburg, Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res, 2003. 149(4): 520–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wigmore, V., C. Tong, and J.R. Flanagan, Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2002. 28(2): 447–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Willingham, D.B., Becoming aware of motor skill. Trends Cogn Sci, 2001. 5(5): 181–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wixted, J.T., The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annu Rev Psychol, 2004. 55: 235–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yin, P.B. and S. Kitazawa, Long-lasting aftereffects of prism adaptation in the monkey. Exp Brain Res, 2001. 141(2): 250–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Young, L.R., Models for neurovestibular adaptation. J Vestib Res, 2003. 13(4–6): 297–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Medical CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations