Introduction to Section on Perception and Action
Over the past few decades, several research communities have (more or less independently) converged onto the idea that many interesting and important issues can be addressed by studying the connection between perception and action. Although much has been learned about vision, hearing, touch, and motor control by studying these systems in isolation, investigations of the rich interplay between perception and action have led to a new set of research questions and a fresh perspective on old problems. The six chapters that follow illustrate why the study of perception and action is bound to play an important role in making progress in motor control.
The primary goal of this introductory chapter is to provide readers with some broader context to better appreciate the six chapters that follow. In the next section, four central themes in the study of perception and action will be reviewed: (1) the coupling of perception and action, (2) the role of internal models, prediction, and...
KeywordsInternal Model Mirror Neuron Feedforward Control Mirror Neuron System Ventral Stream
- Donges, E. (1978). A two-level model of driver steering behavior. Human Factors, 28, 211–221.Google Scholar
- Duffy, C. (2003). The cortical analysis of optic flow. In L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2007). Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hecht, H., & Savelsbergh, G. (Eds.). (2004). Time-to-contact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Land, M. F. (1998). The visual control of steering. In L. R. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Vision and Action (pp. 163–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (2004). Model-based control of perception-action. In L. M. Vaina, S. A. Beardsley & S. K. Rushton (Eds.), Optic flow and beyond: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ramachandran, V. S., & Oberman, L. M. (2006). Broken mirrors: A theory of autism. Scientific American(November), 295(5), 62–69.Google Scholar
- Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American (November), 295(5), 54–61.Google Scholar
- Warren, W. H. (1988). Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Movement behavior: The motor-action controversy. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar