Values, Ideology, and Value Orientations


Micro Model Perceive Behavioral Control Orientation Concept Domination Orientation Mutualism Scale 


  1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Wilson.Google Scholar
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., Bergami, M., & Leone, L. (2003, October). Hierarchical representation of motives in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 915–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bright, A. D., Barro, S. C., & Burtz, R. T. (2002). Public attitudes toward ecological restoration in the Chicago metropolitan region. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 763–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, H. (1980). Sociological and psychological approaches to assessing and categorizing wildlife values. In W. W. Shaw, & E. H. Zube (Eds.), Wildlife values (pp. 70–76). Center for Assessment of Noncommodity Natural Resource Vales, Insti. Series Report 1.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. T. (1963). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends as quasi-experiments. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, T. W., & Kellert, S. R. (1988). Toward a policy paradigm of the wildlife sciences. Renewable Resources Journal, 6(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
  8. Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs and actions: A situational approach. Environment and Behavior, 32, 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D' Andrade, R. (1992). Human motives and cultural models. In R. D’Andrade, & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 23–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dayer, A. A., Stinchfield, H. M., & Manfredo, M. J. (2007). Stories about wildlife: Developing an instrument for identifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 307–315.Google Scholar
  11. De St. Aubin, (Ed.). (1996). Personal ideology: Its emotional foundation and its manifestation in individual value systems, religiosity, political orientation, and assumptions concerning human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 152–165.Google Scholar
  12. Decker, D. J., & Goeff, G.R. (Eds.). (1987). Valuing wildlife: economic and social perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dietz, T. A., Frisch, S., Kalof, L., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values and vegetarianism: An exploratory analysis. Rural Sociology, 60(3), 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Feather, N. T. (1988). Values, valences and course enrollment: testing the role of personal values within an expectancy value framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gigliotti, L., & Harmoning, A. (2004, Spring). Findings abstract. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9(1), 79–81.Google Scholar
  18. Hautaluoma, J., & Brown, P. J. (1978). Attributes of the deer hunting experience: a cluster-analytic study. Journal of Leisure Research, 10, 271–278.Google Scholar
  19. Hendee, J. C. (1974). A multiple-satisfaction approach to game management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2(3), 104–113.Google Scholar
  20. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I., & Daigle, J. (2001). Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations. In A. Manning, & J. Serpell (Eds.), Animals and human society (pp. 1–22). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Jacob, G. R., & Schreyer, R. (1980). Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 368–380.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobs, M. H. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in the Netherlands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 317–329.Google Scholar
  28. Kaczensky, P. (2007). Wildlife value orientations of rural Mongolians. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 317–329.Google Scholar
  29. Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). The relationship of general life values to attitudes toward large carnivores. Human Ecology Review, 9(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  30. Kellert, S. R. (1976). Perceptions of animals in American society. Transactions of North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 41, 533–546.Google Scholar
  31. Kellert, S. R. (1978). Attitudes and characteristics of hunters and anti-hunters. Transactions of North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 43, 412–423.Google Scholar
  32. Kellert, S. R. (1980). American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update. International Journal for the Study on Animal Problems, 1(2), 87–112.Google Scholar
  33. Kellert, S. R. (1983). Affective, evaluative and cognitive perception of animals. In I. Altman, & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (chapter. 7). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kellert, S. R. (1984). Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 18, 355–363.Google Scholar
  35. Kellert, S. R. (1985). Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote. Biological Conservation, 31, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 41–69). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kellert, S. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kellert, S. R. (2000). Values, ethics, and spiritual and scientific relations to nature. In S. R. Kellert, & T. J. Farnham (Eds.), The good in nature and humanity (pp. 49–64). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn, & S. R. Kellert, (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kellert, S. R., & Berry, J. K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15(3), 363–371.Google Scholar
  41. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  42. King R. T. (1947). The future of wildlife in forest and land use. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference, 12, 454–467.Google Scholar
  43. Kluckholn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientation in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons, & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kotchen, M. & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of non-use values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics, 32, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langeneau, E., Kellert, S. R., & Applegate, J. E. (1984). Values in management. In L. K. Halls (Ed.), White-tailed deer: ecology and management (pp. 699–720). Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books.Google Scholar
  46. Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2003). Ideologies, values, and behavior. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283–308). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L. & Bright, A. D. (2004). Application of the concepts of values and attitudes in human dimensions of natural resources research. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge. Prepared for the 10th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management (pp. 271–282). Jefferson, Missouri: Modern Litho.Google Scholar
  48. Manfredo, M. J., Zinn, H. C., Sikorowski, L., & Jones, J. (1998). Public acceptance of mountain lion management: A case study of Denver, Colorado, and nearby foothills areas. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26(4), 964–970.Google Scholar
  49. Manfredo, M. J., Fulton, D., & Pierce, C. (1997). Understanding voting behavior on wildlife ballot initiatives: The case of Colorado’s Amendment 14. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2(4), 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Markus, H., & Zajonic, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G.Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  52. Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and cultural theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Potter, D. R., Hendee, J. C., & Clark, R. N. (1973). Hunting satisfaction: Game, guns, or nature. In J. C. Hendee, & C. Schoenfeld (Eds.), Human dimension in wildlife programs (pp. 62–71). Washington, DC: Mercury Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191–263). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Purdy, K. G., & Decker, D. J. (1989, Winter). Applying wildlife values information in management: The wildlife attitudes and values scale. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17(4), 494–500.Google Scholar
  57. Raadik, J., & Cottrell, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations: An Estonian case study. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 347–357.Google Scholar
  58. Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any other name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Schwartz, S. (2004). Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. In A.Tamayo, & J. Porto (Eds.), Vialores e Trabalho. Brazil: Editora Universidade de Brasilis.Google Scholar
  63. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 136–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance. A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shaw, W. W., & Zube, E. H. (Eds.). (1980). Wildlife values (Report 1). Tucson: Center for Assessment of Noncommodity Natural Resource Values, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, E. T. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391–445). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (2 ed.,Vol. 3, pp. 77–118). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  68. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new environmental paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sturch, N., S. Schwartz, H., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2002). Meanings of basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 16–28.Google Scholar
  74. Tanakanjana, N., & Saranet, S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in Thailand: preliminary findings. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 339–345.Google Scholar
  75. Teel, T. L., Dayer, A. A., Manfredo, M. J., & Bright, A. D. (2005). Regional results from the research project entitled “Wildlife values in the West.” (Project Re. No. 58). Project Report for the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.Google Scholar
  76. Teel, T. L., Manfredo, M. J. & Stinchfield, H. S. (2007). The need and theoretical basis for exploring wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 297–307.Google Scholar
  77. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  78. Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 523–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vitterso, J., Berke, T., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1999). Attitudes toward large carnivores among sheep farmers experiencing different degrees of depredation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 4(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wildavsky, A. (1991). The rise of radical egalitarianism. Washington, DC: The American University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Williams, R. M. (1968). The concept of values. In D. S. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 283–287). New York: Macmillian Free Press.Google Scholar
  82. Zinn, H. C., & Shen, X. S. (2007). Wildlife value orientations in China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(5), 331–338.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations