Hypnotic Amplification–Attenuation Technique for Tinnitus Management

  • Arreed Barabasz
  • Marianne Barabasz

Hypnosis has demonstrated effectiveness for numerous psychologically and medically related disorders. Despite the prevalence of tinnitus, few systematic investigations or clinical case studies of the effects of hypnosis in the treatment of this disorder have been reported. Most studies reported rely on scripted or audiorecorded hypnotic inductions which are known to be less effective than those tailored to the individual patient. All but one of the studies reviewed failed to measure hypnotizability by an instrument with appropriate psychometric properties (e.g., the Stanford Scales). Thus, it is impossible to draw any conclusion about the specificity of hypnosis with regard to treatment outcomes.

Brattberg employed hypnosis to treat 32 patients diagnosed with and suffering from tinnitus for an average of 5 years. All reported no response or relief from previous medical interventions. The hypnotic suggestion employed was that they would “no longer be troubled by the noise.” The first follow-up occurred between 2 months and 2 years. Twenty-two patients (69%) reported they felt better and three of the 22 reported they were “completely cured.” At a second follow-up, 10.5 months to 2.5 years later, for those who reported improvement at the first follow-up, relief from tinnitus was generally maintained. However, the criteria for improvement were not specified.


Clinical Case Study Attenuation Technique Hypnotic Suggestion Hypnotic Intervention Experimental Hypnosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Tinnitus Association. 2007. Available at: http://www.ata.org/about_tinnitus/consumer/faq.html#2.
  2. 2.
    Barabasz A, Christensen C. Age regression: tailored versus scripted inductions. Am J Clin Hypn. 2006;49(2):251–261.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brattberg, G. An alternative method of treating tinnitus: Relaxation-hypnotherapy primarily through the use of a recorded audio cassette. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2000;31, (2), 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harasymczuk M. Hypnosis as an adjunct to tinnitus retraining therapy in the treatment of persistent tinnitus. Aust J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000;28(2):169–175.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgan A, & Hilgard ER. The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1978–79;21, 148–169.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attias J, Shemesh Z, Shoham C, Shahar A, Sohmer H. Efficacy of self-hypnosis for tinnitus relief. Scand Audiol. 1990;19:245–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mason J, & Rogerson D. Client-centered hypnotherapy for tinnitus: who is likely to benefit? American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1994;37, (4) 294–299.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fromm E. How to write a clinical paper: a brief communication. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1981;29:5–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berkin G, Weinstein D, Stern W. Weight gain: a side effect of tricyclic antidepressants. J Affect Disord. 1984;7:133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Attias J, Shemesh Z, Sohmer H, Gold, Shoham C, & Faraggi T. Comparison between self-hypnosis, masking and attentiveness for alleviation of chronic tinnitus. Audiology, 1993;32, 205–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barabasz A, Watkins JG. Hypnotherapeutic Techniques 2E. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benham G, Woody EZ, Wilson KS, Nash MR. Expect the unexpected: ability, attitude, and responsiveness to hypnosis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91:342–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barabasz A. EEG markers of alert hypnosis: the induction makes a difference. Sleep Hypn. 2000;2(4);164–169.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barabasz A, Barabasz M, Jensen S, Calvin S, Trevison M, Warner D. Cortical event related potentials show the structure of hypnotic suggestions is crucial. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1999;47(10):5–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barabasz A, & Lonsdale C. Effects of hypnosis on P300 olfactory evoked potential amplitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1983;92, 520–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spiegel D, Bierre P, Rootenberg J. Hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146:749–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spiegel D, Cutcomb S, Ren C, Pribram K. Hypnotic hallucinations alter evoked potentials. J Abnorm Psychol. 1985;94:249–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arreed Barabasz
    • 1
  • Marianne Barabasz
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Hypnosis ResearchWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Clinical TrainingWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations