Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Scoring Methods with Applications

  • Cengiz Kahraman
  • Semra Birgün
  • Vedat Zeki Yenen
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 16)


The multi-attribute scoring methods are widely used while comparing the alternatives because of their simplicity. In the case of incomplete information and vagueness, these multi-attribute scoring methods have been extended to obtain the fuzzy versions. In this chapter, fuzzy simple additive weighting methods and fuzzy multiplicative weighting methods are explained with numerical examples.

Key words

Scoring simple additive weighting multiplicative weighting multi-attribute 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baas, S.M., and Kwakernaak, H., 1977, Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternative using fuzzy sets, Automatica, 13: 47-58.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Bector, C.R., Appadoo, S.S., and Chandra, S., 2002, Weighted factors scoring model under fuzzy data, Proceeding of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Management Science Division, ed. Kumar, U., 95í105, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
  3. Belacel, N., and Boulassel, M.R., 2004, Multicriteria fuzzy classification procedure procftn: methodology and medical application, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 141(2): 203-217.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonissone, P.P., 1982, A fuzzy set based linguistic approach: Theory and applications, in Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis, Gupta, M.M., and Sanchez, E., eds., pp: 329-339, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, Y.M., and McInnis, B., 1980, An algorithm for multiple attribute, multiple alternative decision problem based on fuzzy sets with application to medical diagnosis, IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-10: 645-650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, S-J., Hwang, C-L., and Hwang, F.P., 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: Methods And Applications, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubois, D., and Prade, H., 1982, The use of fuzzy numbers in decision analysis, in Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, Gupta, M.M., and Sanchez, E., eds., 309-321, North-Holland, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, W., 1977, How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-7: 326-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farmer, T.A., 1987, Testing the robustness of multi-attribute utility theory in an applied setting, Decision Sciences, 18(2): 178-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fishburn, P.C., 1976, Noncompensatory preferences. Synthese, 33: 393-403.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graf, A., 2005, Fuzzy logic approach for modelling multiplayer game scoring system, 8th International Conference on Telecommunications ConTEL 2005, pp: 347-352, Zagreb, Croatia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobbs, B.F., 1980, A comparison of weighting methods in power plant siting, Decision Sciences, 11: 725-737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwong, C.K., Ip, W.H., and Chan, J.W.K., 2002, Combining scoring method and fuzzy expert systems approach to supplier assessment: a case study, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(7): 512-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwakernaak, H., 1979, An algorithm for rating multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets, Automatica, 15: 615-616.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Lo, H.C., 2002, A preliminary study of development of fuzzy composite score for multiple assessments, Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10(4): 407-421.Google Scholar
  16. Mitra, S., Konwar, K.M., and Pal, S.K., 2002, Fuzzy Decision Three, Linguistic Rules and Fuzzy Knowledge-Based Network: Generation and Evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetic Part C: Applications and Reviews, 32(4): 328-339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohdar, R., and Kumar, P.R., 2004, Performance measurement and evaluation of suppliers in supply chain: an evolutionary fuzzy-based approach, Journal of Manufacturing Technology, Management, 15(8): 723-734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vanegas, L.V., and Labib, A.W., 2001, Application of new fuzzy-weighted average (NFWA) method to engineering design evaluation, International Journal of Production Research, 36(6): 1147-1162.Google Scholar
  19. Yoo, K.P., and Hwang, C-L., 1995, Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: An Introduction, Sage University Publications, California.Google Scholar
  20. Zhang, T., Benini, L., and De Micheli, G., 2001, Component selection and matching for ip-based design, Proceedings of the Design and Test in Europe, March: 40-46.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, W., 2004, Handover Decision Using Fuzzy MADM in Heterogeneous Networks, WCNC 2004, IEEE Communications Society, 653-658.Google Scholar
  22. Zadeh, L., 1965, Fuzzy sets, Information Control, 8: 338-353.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cengiz Kahraman
    • 1
  • Semra Birgün
    • 2
  • Vedat Zeki Yenen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityMaçka, İstanbul
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul Commerce UniversityÜsküdar, İstanbul

Personalised recommendations