Skip to main content

Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Industrial Robotic Systems Using Topsis

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 16))

Abstract

Industrial robots have been increasingly used by many manufacturing firms in different industries. Although the number of robot manufacturers is also increasing with many alternative ranges of robots, potential end users are faced with many options in both technical and economical factors in the evaluation of the industrial robotic systems. Industrial robotic system selection is a complex problem, in which many qualitative attributes must be considered. These kinds of attributes make the evaluation process hard and vague. The hierarchical structure is a good approach to describing a complicated system. This chapter proposes a fuzzy hierarchical technique for order preference by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS) model for the multi-criteria evaluation of the industrial robotic systems. An application is presented with some sensitivity analyses by changing the critical parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abo-Sinna, M., and Abou-El-Enien, T.H.M., 2005, An interactive algorithm for large scale multiple objective programming problems with fuzzy parameters through TOPSIS approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 177(2): 515-527.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, V.P., Khohl, V., and Gupta, S., 1991, Computer aided robot selection: the multiple attribute decision making approach, International Journal of Production Research, 29: 1629-1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 2007, ISO Standard 8373:1994, Manipulating Industrial Robots— Vocabulary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubekri, N., Sahoui, M., and Lakrib, C., 1991, Development of an expert system for industrial robot selection, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 20: 119-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, Y., and Yung, M., 2003, Satisfaction assessment of multi-objective schedules using neural fuzzy methodology, International Journal of Production Research, 41(8): 1831-1849.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-H., 1985, Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17: 113-129.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.F., and Tzeng, G.H., 2004, Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40: 1473-1490.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.J., and Hwang, C.L., 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T.-C., 2000, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114: 1-9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., Chan, C.W., and Huang, G.H., 2002, Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting Decisions of Solid Waste Management, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 37(6): 975-990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, T.-C, 2002, Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(6): 687-701.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, T.-C., and Lin, Y.-C., 2003, A Fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21: 284-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J.J., 2005, Introduction to Robotics, Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E.L. and Maimon, O.Z., 1988, Specification and Selection of Robots, Artificial Intelligence Implications for CIM, Kusiak, A., ed., IFS Publications, Bedford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P.Y. and Ghandforoush, P., 1984, Procedures Given for Evaluating Selecting Robots, Industrial Engineering, (April): 44-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh, L.F., and Izadikhah, M., 2006, An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175: 1375-1384.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.S., Malmborg, C.J., and Agee, M.H., 1985, Decision support system used for robot selection, Industrial Engineering, 17: 66-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, W., and Mital, A., 1986, Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 19: 105-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A., and Gupta M., 1988, Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, K., and Getto, R.D.Jr., 1982, A model for evaluating alternative robot systems under uncertainty, International Journal of Production Research, 20: 155-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.S., and Li, R.L., 1998, Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events, Computer and Mathematics with Applications, 15: 887-896.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G.-S., 1999, Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts, European Journal of Operational Research, 112: 682-691.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, T.S., and Wang, M.J.J., 1992, Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50: 247-255.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R. and Vickery, S.K., 1988, An experimental evaluation of articulation of preferences in multiple criterion decision-making (MCDM) Methods, Decision Sciences, 19: 880-888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nnaji, B.O., 1988, Evaluation methodology for performance and system economics for robotic devices, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 14: 27-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nnaji, B.O., and Yannacopoulou, M., 1988, A utility theory based robot selection and evaluation for electronics assembly, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 14: 477-493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nof, S.Y. and Lechtman, H., 1982, Robot time and motion provides means for evaluating alternative work methods, Industrial Engineering, 14: 38-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nof, S.Y., 1985, Robot Ergonomics: Optimizing Robot Work, Handbook of Industrial Robotics, Nof, S.Y., ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou, E., and Lin, C.T., 1996, Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 14: 281-310.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L.-W., 1999, Robot Analysis. Wiley. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur, S.-H., Chang, T.-Y., and Yen, C.-H., 2002, The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, 23: 107-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.M., and Elhag, T.M.S., 2006, Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications, 31: 309-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R., 1982, Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T., and Hung, C.C., 2005, Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Article in Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L., 1965, Fuzzy sets, Information Control, 8: 338-353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., and Lu, J., 2003, An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria, Group Decision and Negotiation, 12: 501-515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R., and Govind, R., 1991, Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy numbers, Information Sciences, 54: 103-130.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kahraman, C., Kaya, I., ©evik, S., Ates, N.Y., Gülbay, M. (2008). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Industrial Robotic Systems Using Topsis. In: Kahraman, C. (eds) Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics