Advertisement

A SWOT-AHP Application Using Fuzzy Concept: E-Government in Turkey

  • Cengiz Kahraman
  • Nihan Çetin Demirel
  • Tufan Demirel
  • Nüfer Yasin Ateş
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 16)

Abstract

E-government refers to the delivery of information and services online via the Internet. Many governmental units across the world have embraced the digital revolution and placed a wide range of materials on the web, from publications to databases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and to determine the alternative strategies for e-government applications in Turkey. We use the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach in combination with the crisp and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to achieve this task. The strategies have been prioritized by using both methods comparatively and sensitivity analyses of the obtained results have been presented.

Key words

Outranking fuzzy outranking relation pair-wise comparison e-government SWOT analytic hierarchy process strategic planning sensitivity analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akman, I., Yazici, A., and Arifo÷lu, A., 2002, E-government: Turkey Profile, Proceedings of International European Conference on e-government, Oxford, U.K, pp. 27-39.Google Scholar
  2. Akman, I., Yazici, A., Mishra, A., Arifo÷lu, A., 2005, E-Government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens, Government Information Quarterly, 22: 239-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, D-Y., 1996, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649-655.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, D-Y., 1992, Extent analysis and synthetic decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1, World Scientific, Singapore, 352.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Y.C., and Gant, J., 2001, Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers, Government Information Quarterly, 18: 343-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gil-Garcia, J.R., and Pardo, T.A., 2005, E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations, Government Information Quarterly, 22: 187-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta, M.P., and Jana, D., 2003, E-government evaluation: a framework and case study, Government Information Quarterly, 30: 365-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., and Ruan, D., 2004, Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP:The case of TURKEY, International Journal of Production Economics, 87: 171-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., and Van Eck, D., 2001, Gauging e-government: a report on implementing services among American cities, Government Information Quarterly, 18: 293-307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., and Kajanus, M., 2000, Utilzing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forecast-certification case, Forecast Policy and Economics, 1: 41-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Layne, K., and Lee, J., 2001, Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, 18: 122-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD, 2003, The e-government imperative: Main findings. Vaidvay, O.S., and Kumar, S., 2006, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 169: 1-29.Google Scholar
  13. Reddick, C.G., 2004, A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities, Government Information Quarterly, 21: 51-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saaty, T.L., 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3): 234-281.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Saaty, T.L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Saaty, T.L., 1993, The analytic hierarchy process: a 1993 overview, Central European Journal of Operation Research and Economics, 2(2): 119-137.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Saaty, T.L., and Vargas, L.G., 2001, Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations / and The American Society for Public Administration (MN/ASPA), 2002, Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective, UN/ASPA: New York.Google Scholar
  19. Weihrich, H., 1982, The TOWS matrix-a tool for situation analysis, Long Range Planning, 15 (2): 54-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zadeh, L., 1965, Fuzzy sets, Information Control, 8: 338-353.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Zimmermann, H.-J., 1994, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cengiz Kahraman
    • 1
  • Nihan Çetin Demirel
    • 2
  • Tufan Demirel
    • 2
  • Nüfer Yasin Ateş
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityMacka, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringYildiz Technical UniversityYildiz, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations