Advertisement

Evolution of Complex Acoustic Signals in Drosophila Species

  • Anneli Hoikkala
  • Dominique Mazzi

Males of most Drosophila species produce complex acoustic cues, so-called courtship songs, while pursuing a female. In most of the over 100 species studied so far (see the list of these species in Hoikkala, 2005), such cues are produced by wing vibration. Other mechanisms of song production include abdomen purring (Hoy, Hoikkala, & Kaneshiro, 1988) and rapid vibrations of the whole body (Ritchie & Gleason, 1995). The carrier frequency of songs produced through any of these actions ranges from 150 to 500 Hz. A hitherto unknown mechanism enables males of some Hawaiian species to generate songs of up to 15,000 Hz (Hoikkala, Hoy, & Kaneshiro, 1989).

Keywords

Quantitative Trait Locus Female Preference Drosophila Species Song Type Interpulse Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso-Pimentel, H., Spangler, H. G., & Heed, W. B. (1995). Courtship sounds and behaviour of the two saguaro-breeding Drosophila and their relatives. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspi, J. (2000). Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity, 84, 273–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspi, J., & Hoikkala, A. (1995). Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 8, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspi, J., Lumme, J., Hoikkala, A., & Heikkinen, E. (1993). Reproductive ecology of the boreal riparian guild of Drosophila. Ecography, 16, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, T. C. M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature, 363, 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basolo, A. L. (1990). Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science, 250, 808–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butlin, R. K., & Ritchie, M. G. (1989). Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: What is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 37, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R. G. B. (1965). Courtship behaviour in the Drosophila obscura group. Part II. Comparative studies. Behaviour, 25, 281–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campesan, S., Dubrova, Y., Hall, J. C., & Kyriacou, C. P. (2001). The nonA gene in Drosophila conveys species-specific behavioral characteristics. Genetics, 158, 1535–1543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Colegrave, N., Hollocher, H., Hinton, K., & Ritchie, M. G. (2000). The courtship song of African Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowling, D. E., & Burnet, B. (1981). Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Animal Behaviour, 29, 924–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crossley, S. A. (1986). Courtship sounds and behaviour in the four species of the Drosophila bipectinata complex. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1146–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  14. Etges, W. J. (2002). Divergence in mate choice systems: does evolution play by rules? Genetica, 116, 151–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etges, W. J., Over, K. F., Cardoso de Oliveira, C., & Ritchie, M. G. (2006). Inheritance of courtship song variation among geographically isolated populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Animal Behaviour, 71, 1205–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewing, A. W. (1969). The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Animal Behaviour, 17, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewing, A. W. (1979). Complex courtship songs in the Drosophila funebris species group: escape from an evolutionary bottleneck. Animal Behaviour, 27, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ewing, A. W, & Bennet-Clark, H. C. (1968). The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour, 31, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ewing, A. W., & Miyan, J. A. (1986). Sexual selection, sexual isolation and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Animal Behaviour, 34, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, G. (2002). Microarrays in ecology and evolution: a preview. Molecular Ecology, 11, 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilburn, A. S., & Day, T. H. (1994). Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 255, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleason, J. M. (2005). Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila. Behavior Genetics, 35, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gleason, J. M., & Ritchie, M. G. (1998). Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: Do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution, 52, 1493–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleason, J. M., & Ritchie, M. G. (2004). Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTLs? Genetics, 166, 1303–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gleason, J. M., Nuzhdin, S. V., & Ritchie, M. G. (2002). Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 89, 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Göpfert, M. C., & Robert, D. (2002). The mechanical basis of Drosophila audition. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1199–1208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Göpfert, M. C., & Robert, D. (2003). Motion generation by Drosophila mechanosensory neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 5514–5519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henderson, N. R., & Lambert, D. M. (1982). No significant deviation from random mating of worldwide populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 300, 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoikkala, A. (2005). Inheritance of male sound characteristics in Drosophila species. In S. Drosopoulos & M. F. Claridge (Eds.), Insect sounds and communication: Physiology, behaviour, ecology and evolution (pp. 167–177). Boca Raton: CRC Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Hoikkala, A., & Crossley, S. (2000). Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: Behaviour and songs of D. birchii and D. serrata. Journal of Insect Behavior, 13, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoikkala, A., & Isoherranen, E. (1997). Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-reared Drosophila montana and D. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 10, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoikkala, A., & Lumme, J. (1987). The genetic basis of evolution of male courtship sounds in the Drosophila virilis group. Evolution, 4, 827–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoikkala, A., Lakovaara, S., & Romppainen, E. (1982). Mating behavior and male courtship sounds in the Drosophila virilis group. In S. Lakovaara (Ed.), Advances in genetics, development, and evolution of Drosophila (pp. 407–421). New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  34. Hoikkala, A., Hoy, R., & Kaneshiro, K. (1989). High-frequency clicks of Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila species. Animal Behaviour, 37, 927–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoikkala, A., Kaneshiro, K., & Hoy, R. (1994). Courtship songs of the picture-winged Drosophila planitibia subgroup species. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1363–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoikkala, A., Aspi, J., & Suvanto, L. (1998). Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 265, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoy, R., Hoikkala, A., & Kaneshiro, K. (1988). Hawaiian courtship songs: Evolutionary innovation in communication signals of Drosophila. Science, 240, 217–219.Google Scholar
  38. Huttunen, S., & Aspi, J. (2003). Complex inheritance of male courtship song characters in Drosophila virilis. Behavior Genetics, 33, 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huttunen, S., Campesan, S., & Hoikkala, A. (2002). Nucleotide variation at the no-on-transient A gene in Drosophila littoralis. Heredity, 88, 39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huttunen, S., Aspi, J., Hoikkala, A., & Schlötterer, C. (2004). QTL analysis of variation in male courtship song characters in Drosophila virilis. Heredity, 92, 263–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawanishi, M., & Watanabe, T. K. (1980). Genetic variation of courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Japanese Journal of Genetics, 55, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klappert, K., Mazzi, D., Hoikkala, A. & Ritchie, M. (2007). Male courtship song and female preference variation between phylogeographically distinct populations of Drosophila montana. Evolution, 61, 1481–1488.Google Scholar
  43. Kyriacou, C. P., & Hall, J. C. (1980). Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male’s courtship song. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 77, 6729–6733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kyriacou, C. P., & Hall, J. C. (1982). The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Animal Behaviour, 30, 794–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liimatainen, J. O., & Hoikkala, A. (1998). Interactions of the males and females of three sympatric Drosophila virilis group species, D. montana, D. littoralis, and D. lummei (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in intra- and interspecific courtships in the wild and in the laboratory. Journal of Insect Behavior, 11, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liimatainen, J. O., Hoikkala, A., Aspi, J., & Welbergen, P. (1992). Courtship in Drosophila montana: The effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of the flies. Animal Behaviour, 43, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mackay, T. F. C. (2001). Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mackay, T. F. C., Heinsohn, S. L., Lyman, R. F., Moehring, A. J., Morgan, T. J., & Rollman, S. M. (2005). Genetics and genomics of Drosophila mating behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 6622–6629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markow, T. A., & O’Grady, P. M. (2005). Evolutionary genetics of reproductive behavior in Drosophila: connecting the dots. Annual Review of Genetics, 39, 263–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matthews, K. A., Kaufman, T. C., & Gelbart, W. M. (2005). Research resources for Drosophila: the expanding universe. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 179–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McDonald, J. H., & Kreitman, M. (1991). Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature, 351, 652–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peixoto, A. A., & Hall, J. C. (1998). Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the courtship song of Drosophila. Genetics, 148, 827–838.Google Scholar
  53. Pizzari, T., & Snook, R. (2003). Perspective: Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution, 57, 1223–1236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pomiankowski, A., & Sheridan, L. (1994). Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 242–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pugh, A. R. G. & Ritchie, M. G. (1996). Polygenic control of a mating signal in Drosophila. Heredity, 77, 378–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Päällysaho, S., Huttunen, S., & Hoikkala, A. (2001). Identification of X chromosomal restriction fragment length polymorphism markers and their use in a gene localization study in Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. Genome, 44, 242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Päällysaho, S., Aspi, J., Liimatainen, J. O., & Hoikkala, A. (2003). Role of X chromosomal song genes in the evolution of species-specific courtship songs in Drosophila virilis group species. Behavior Genetics, 33, 25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Riedl, C. A. L., Neal, S. J., Robichon, A., Westwood, J. T., & Sokolowski, M. B. (2005). Drosophila soluble guanylyl cyclase mutants exhibit increased foraging locomotion: behavioral and genomic investigations. Behavior Genetics, 35, 231–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ritchie, M. G. (1996). The shape of female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 14628–14631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ritchie, M. G., & Gleason, J. M. (1995). Rapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoni sibling species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ritchie, M. G., & Phillips, S. D. F. (1998). The genetics of sexual isolation. In D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher (Eds.), Endless forms and speciation (pp. 291–308). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ritchie, M. G., Townhill, R. M., & Hoikkala, A. (1998). Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Animal Behaviour, 56, 713–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ritchie, M. G., Halsey, E. J., & Gleason, J. M. (1999). Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Animal Behaviour, 58, 649–657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ritchie, M. G., Saarikettu, M., Livingstone, S., & Hoikkala, A. (2001). Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution, 55, 721–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ritchie, M. G., Saarikettu, M., & Hoikkala, A. (2005). Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Animal Behaviour, 70, 849–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rong, Y. S., & Golic, K. G. (2001). A targeted gene knockout in Drosophila. Genetics, 157, 1307–1312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rowe, L., & Houle, D. (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition-dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 263, 1415–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saarikettu, M., Liimatainen, J. O., & Hoikkala, A. (2005). The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana. Behavior Genetics, 35, 257–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Suvanto, L., Liimatainen, J. O., Tregenza, T., & Hoikkala, A. (2000). Courtship signals and mate choice of the flies of inbred Drosophila montana strains. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123, 585–595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, M. A., & Klaper, R. (2004). Genomics for the ecological toolbox. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 439–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tomaru, M., & Oguma, Y. (1994). Differences in courtship song in the species of the Drosophila auraria complex. Animal Behaviour, 47, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tomaru, M., Doi, M., Higuchi, H., & Oguma, Y. (2000). Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific song make females receptive in D. melanogaster, but not in D. sechellia. Evolution, 54, 1286–1294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Vuoristo, M., Isoherranen, E., & Hoikkala, A. (1996). Female wing spreading as acceptance signal in the Drosophila virilis group of species. Journal of Insect Behavior, 9, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagner, G. P., & Bürger, R. (1985). On the evolution of dominance modifiers II: a nonequilibrium approach to the evolution of genetic systems. Journal of theoretical Biology, 113, 475–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wheeler, D. A., Kyriacou, C. P., Greenacre, M. L., Yu, Q., Rutila, J. E., Rosbash, M., et al. (1991). Molecular transfer of a species-specific behavior from Drosophila simulans to Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 251, 1082–1085.Google Scholar
  77. Wilkinson, G. S., & Reillo, P. R. (1994). Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 255, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams, M. A., Blouin, A. G., & Noor, M. A. F. (2001). Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudodobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity, 86, 68–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yamada, H., Matsuda, M., & Oguma, Y. (2002). Genetics of sexual isolation based on courtship song between two sympatric species: Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Genetica, 116, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang, Z. (2000). Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML). Version 3.0. London: University College London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Institute of Plant SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations