Advanced Glaucoma and Low Vision: Evaluation and Treatment

  • Scott Robison


The hallmark of glaucoma is progressive vision loss, albeit in the early stages the vision loss is peripheral and often not discernible to the patient. Patients with advanced glaucoma may have significant vision loss, both peripheral and central, possibly with devastating impact on the patient’s ability to perform their activities of daily living. Advanced glaucoma can be one of the most challenging and difficult conditions for the vision rehabilitation specialist to treat. The degree of success with the rehabilitation therapies currently available is limited, and rehabilitation itself does not protect against further vision loss that may continue to worsen even with the best medical and surgical care available to the patient. When the patient incurs vision loss that is functionally disabling, it is incumbent on the eye care provider, either ophthalmologist or optometrist, to have a strategy for vision rehabilitation (low vision) in place. Some rehabilitation services are easily provided in the office setting, while others must be referred out of office to provide the services the patient needs.


Contact Lens Screen Reader Correct Distance Visual Acuity Vision Rehabilitation Advanced Glaucoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Many thanks to Jane Bachman Groth, Joseph Beringer, John Conto, David Deuker, Tricia Fekete, Serena Lynn, Laura Mazzie, Dennis Siemsen and Deb Wahlers for their contributions.


  1. 1.
    Allingham RR, Damjii K, Freedman S, et al. Shields’ Textbook of Glaucoma. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:702.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheong AM, Geruschat DR, Congdon N. Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(1):26–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haymes SA, Leblanc RP, Nicolela MT, et al. Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 1149–1155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, et al. Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003;31(6):482–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, et al. Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):941–948.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allingham RR, Damjii K, Freedman S, et al. Assessment of visual fields. In: Shields’ Textbook of Glaucoma. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hattenhauer M, Johnson D, Ing H, et al. The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2099–2104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anctil J, Anderson D. Early foveal involvement and generalized depression of the visual field in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stamper RL. The effect of glaucoma on central visual function. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1984;82:792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drance SM. Diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, et al. Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Airaksinen PJ. Diffuse field loss and diffuse retinal nerve-fiber loss in glaucoma. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1992;1:22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pinilla I, et al. Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucomatous suspects. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002;12:49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brilliant RL, Ginsburg LH. Rehabilitation of Peripheral Field Defects. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ray JS. Visual rehabilitation and low vision therapy for the patient with glaucomatous vision loss. In: Sassani JW II, ed. Ophthalmic Fundamentals: Glaucoma. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matchinski T, Brilliant R, Bednarksi M. Low vision near systems I: microscopes and magnifiers. In: Brilliant RL, ed. Essentials of Low Vision Practice. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann; 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waiss B, Cohen JM. Visual impairment and visual efficiency training. In: Cold RG, Rosenthal BP, eds. Remediation and Management of Low Vision. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turano K, Geruschat D, Baker F, et al. Direction of gaze while walking a simple route: persons with normal vision and persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(9):667–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kozlowski JM, Mainster M, Avila M. Negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(8):1182–1184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Faye EE. Clinical Low Vision. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1984:529.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoppe E, Perlin R. The effectivity of fresnel prisms for visual field enhancement. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64(1):46–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ray JR. Visual Rehabilitation and Low Vision Therapy for the Patient with Glaucomatous Vision Loss. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 1999.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chadwick Optical Inc. 1763 Old River Rd. PO Box 485 White River JCT., Vermont, 05001, Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kennedy W, Rosten J, Young L, et al. A field expander for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a clinical study. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;11:744–755.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herse P. Retinitis Pigmentosa: visual function and multidisciplinary management. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88(5):335–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoeft W, Feinbloom W, Brilliant R, et al. Amorphic lenses: a mobility aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;62:142–148.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Szlyk J, Seiple W, Laderman D, et al. Use of bioptic amorphic lenses to expand the visual field in patients with peripheral loss. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:518–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luo G, Lichtenstein L, Peli E. Collision judgment when viewing minified images through a HMD visual field expander. Proceedings of SPIE, Ophthalmic Technologies XVII 2007; 6426:64261Z.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenberg R. Glare. In: Steun C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, et al., eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention, and Outcomes. New York, NY: Swerts & Zeitlinger; 2000.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolffsohn A, Cochrane H, Yoshimitsue S. Contrast is enhanced by yellow lenses because of selective reduction of short-wave-length light. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(2):73–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nguyen TV, Hoeft WW. A study of corning blue blocker filters and related pathologies. J Vis Rehabil. 1994;8(3):15–21.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gormezano S, Stelmack J. Efficient, effective clinical protocols for prescription of selective absorption filters. In: AA SC, Horowitz A, Lang M, et al., eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention, and Outcomes. New York, NY: Swerts & Zeitlinger; 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freedman PB, Jose RT. The Art and Practice of Low Vision. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997:320.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    NoIR Medical Technologies, South Lyon, MI,, 1-800-521-9746.
  35. 35.
    Goodrich GL. Low vision training. In: Freeman PB, Jose RT, eds. The Art and Practice of Low Vision. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth- Heinemann; 1997.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    AFB. An Introduction to Blindness Services in the United States.
  37. 37. Last accessed August 10, 2008.
  38. 38. Last accessed August 10, 2008.
  39. 39.
    Medicare Learning Network. MLN Matters Number: MM3816. Last accessed February 4, 2010
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
    AFB Directory of Services for Blind and Visually Impaired Persons in the United States and Canada. 25 ed. New York, NY: AFB Press; 1998.Google Scholar


  1. Beckman RJ, Sofinski SJ, Greff LJ, et al. Bandage contact lens augmentation of 5-fluorouracil treatment in glaucoma filtration surgery. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22:563–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellows AR, McCulley JP. Endophthalmitis in aphakic patients with unplanned filtration blebs wearing contact lenses. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:839–844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blok MD, KOK JH, van Mil C, et al. Use of the megasoft bandage lens for treatment of complications after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;110:264–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dada VK, Acharjee SC. Soft lenses as therapeutic device. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1982;30:201–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fresco BB, Trope GR. Opaque contact lenses for YAG laser iridotomy occlusion. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:656–657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grohe RM, Wyse TB. Fitting contact lenses in eyes with filtering blebs. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:439–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta N, Weinreb RN. Filtering bleb infection as a complication of orthokeratology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1076.Google Scholar
  8. Hillman JS, Marsters JB, Broad A. Pilocarpine delivery by hydrophilic lens in the management of acute glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1975;95:79–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Krohn DL. Enhancement of the sensitivity of the peripheral visual field of aphakic eyes by a soft contact lens correction. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1979;127:309–317.Google Scholar
  10. Lois N, Dias JL, Cohen EJ. Use of contact lenses in patients with filtration blebs. CLAO J. 1997;23:100–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, Gelender H, et al. Late onset endophthalmitis associated with filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:964–972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Marmion VJ, Jain MR. Role of soft contact lenses and delivery of drugs. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1976;96:319–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Samples JR, Andre M, MacRae SM. Use of gas permeable contact lenses following trabeculectomy. CLAO J. 1990;16:282–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shoham A, Tessler Z, Finkelman Y, et al. Large soft contact lenses in the management of leaking blebs. CLAO J. 2000;26:37–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Robison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations