Skip to main content

As techniques for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair have become standardized, the remaining questions center on indications. The case of a young laborer with a clinically significant indirect inguinal hernia has been chosen to highlight some of these issues. Chapter 39 addresses the issue of which laparoscopic technique to use, if an endoscopic repair is chosen, through a slightly different case scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IMC. Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 2002;89:1479–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1819–1827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JH Jr, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, et al. Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 1994;129(9):973–979; discussion 979-981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A, Mihelsons M, La Torre G. Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 1999;23:1004–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures versus Lich-tenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2005;19:188–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 1997;84(5):728–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale L, Grant A, McCormack K, Scott NW, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of surgical repair of inguinal hernia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:192-200.

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

  • Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, et al. Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 2002;6:56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collaboration EH. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2000;87:860-867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 2002;6:2-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1:CD001785.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al., on behalf of the EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2005;2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny H, Klingler A, Scheyer M, Fugger R, Bischof G. Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 2006;10(4):331–337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramshaw B, Frankum C, Young D, et al. 1000 total extraperitoneal (tep) laparoscopic herniorrhaphies: after the learning curve. Published proceedings from the 7th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thepjatri, N., Ramshaw, B., Burjonrappa, S.C., Fitzgibbons, R.C. (2008). Indirect Inguinal Hernia. In: Scott-Conner, C.E.H. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Strategic Decision Making. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76671-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76671-3_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76670-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76671-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics