Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the standard procedure in the management of degenerative joint disease after conservative therapy options have been exhausted. However, despite conscientious planning and carefully performed procedures, surgeons are often unsatisfied with implant alignment. Various authors described significant axial or rotational malalignment, and mediolateral and ventrodorsal tilt.1–4 Seemingly small displacements of 2.5 mm potentially alter the range of motion by as much as 20°.5 None of the contemporary improvements in implant design and instrumentation has alleviated these problems.
This led to the development of various robotic systems for improved precision in surgery. Robots are able to accurately position and move tools, thereby reducing human error. These systems rely on preoperative imaging, registration, and planning. The first clinical use was reported 1985 in the field of neurosurgery.6 Orthopedic surgeons started using robotic devices around 1992 for total hip arthroplasty.7 The active surgical robot CASPAR® (Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning and Robotics) was adapted for total hip and knee arthroplasty and for anterior cruciate ligament repair.8 The first robot-assisted knee replacement with this system was performed in March of 2000 in the Orthopedic Center Kassel. A total of 108 consecutive cases were operated on at this institution and followed-up for at least 5 years in a prospective study.9
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aglietti P, Buzzi R. Posteriorly stabilised total-condylar knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 70B: 211, 1988
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B: 709, 1991
Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3: 67, 1988
Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67B: 551, 1985
Garg A, Walker PS. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biochem 23: 45, 1990
Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(2): 153–160, 1998
Börner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A. Rechnerunterstützter Robotereinsatz in der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 26: 251–257, 1997
Petermann J, Kober R, Heinze, R, Frölich JJ, Heeckt PF, Gotzen L. Computer-assisted planning and robot-assisted surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 10: 50, 2000
Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 9: 173–180, 2002
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13, 1989
Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckhardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 75: 573–579, 2004
Howe RD, Matsuoka Y. Robotics for surgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1: 211, 1999
Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Gaudenzi A. Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 3: 17, 1988
Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Sindsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216: 151, 1987
Feng EL, Stuhlberg SD, Wixon RL. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 60, 1994
Laskin RS. Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 72A: 529, 1990
Ritter M, Merbst WA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 76A: 60, 1991
Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205: 21, 1986
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 58A: 754, 1976
Insall JN, Binzzir R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192: 13, 1985
Ranawat CS, Adjei OB. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323: 168, 1988
Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Kershally S. Computer integrated instrumentation in knee arthroplasty – a comparative study of conventional and computerized technique. Presented at the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2000
Nuño-Siebrecht N, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD. Potential errors in axial alignment using intramedullary instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15: 228, 2000
Shi F, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhao Z. A hand-eye robotic model for total knee replacement surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Inverv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv.8(Pt2): 122–30, 2005
Adili A. Robot assisted orthopedic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 11(2): 89, 2004
Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, Gomes P, Cobb J, Davies BL. The first clinical application of a « hands on » robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 6(6): 329, 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siebert, W., Mai, S., Heeckt, P.F. (2010). Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_80
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_80
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76607-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76608-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)