Skip to main content

Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the standard procedure in the management of degenerative joint disease after conservative therapy options have been exhausted. However, despite conscientious planning and carefully performed procedures, surgeons are often unsatisfied with implant alignment. Various authors described significant axial or rotational malalignment, and mediolateral and ventrodorsal tilt.14 Seemingly small displacements of 2.5 mm potentially alter the range of motion by as much as 20°.5 None of the contemporary improvements in implant design and instrumentation has alleviated these problems.

This led to the development of various robotic systems for improved precision in surgery. Robots are able to accurately position and move tools, thereby reducing human error. These systems rely on preoperative imaging, registration, and planning. The first clinical use was reported 1985 in the field of neurosurgery.6 Orthopedic surgeons started using robotic devices around 1992 for total hip arthroplasty.7 The active surgical robot CASPAR® (Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning and Robotics) was adapted for total hip and knee arthroplasty and for anterior cruciate ligament repair.8 The first robot-assisted knee replacement with this system was performed in March of 2000 in the Orthopedic Center Kassel. A total of 108 consecutive cases were operated on at this institution and followed-up for at least 5 years in a prospective study.9

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R. Posteriorly stabilised total-condylar knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 70B: 211, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B: 709, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3: 67, 1988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67B: 551, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garg A, Walker PS. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biochem 23: 45, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(2): 153–160, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Börner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A. Rechnerunterstützter Robotereinsatz in der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopäde 26: 251–257, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petermann J, Kober R, Heinze, R, Frölich JJ, Heeckt PF, Gotzen L. Computer-assisted planning and robot-assisted surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 10: 50, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 9: 173–180, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckhardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 75: 573–579, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howe RD, Matsuoka Y. Robotics for surgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1: 211, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Gaudenzi A. Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 3: 17, 1988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Sindsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216: 151, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng EL, Stuhlberg SD, Wixon RL. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 60, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laskin RS. Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 72A: 529, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter M, Merbst WA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 76A: 60, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205: 21, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 58A: 754, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  20. Insall JN, Binzzir R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192: 13, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ranawat CS, Adjei OB. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323: 168, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Kershally S. Computer integrated instrumentation in knee arthroplasty – a comparative study of conventional and computerized technique. Presented at the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2000

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nuño-Siebrecht N, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD. Potential errors in axial alignment using intramedullary instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15: 228, 2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi F, Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhao Z. A hand-eye robotic model for total knee replacement surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Inverv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv.8(Pt2): 122–30, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adili A. Robot assisted orthopedic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 11(2): 89, 2004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jakopec M, Harris SJ, Rodriguez y Baena F, Gomes P, Cobb J, Davies BL. The first clinical application of a « hands on » robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 6(6): 329, 2001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Siebert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siebert, W., Mai, S., Heeckt, P.F. (2010). Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_80

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_80

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76607-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76608-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics