Percutaneous ORIF of Periarticular Distal Tibia Fractures

  • Michael P. Clare
  • Roy W. Sanders


Periarticular fractures of the distal tibia remain among the more challenging of fractures for the orthopedic surgeon. Traditional methods of treatment have included functional bracing, external fixation with or without limited internal fixation (hybrid fixation), intramedullary nailing, and formal open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Cadaveric studies have previously described the somewhat tenuous vascular supply to the distal metaphysis, which, combined with inherent limitations in the surrounding soft tissue envelope, pose a risk of nonunion and have led to increasing interest in “biologic” fixation techniques.1

These techniques are based upon the principles of limited soft tissue stripping, maintenance of the osteogenic fracture hematoma, and preservation of vascular supply to the individual fracture fragments while restoring axial and rotational alignment, and providing sufficient stability to allow progression of motion, uncomplicated fracture healing, and eventual return to function. As such, the evolution of percutaneous plating techniques has led to the development of low-profile, precontoured implants specifically intended for subcutaneous/submuscular application in the distal tibia.


Distal Tibia Distal Fragment Rotational Alignment Screw Hole Open Reduction Internal Fixation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Borrelli J Jr, Prickett W, Song E, et al. Extraosseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating techniques: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16:691–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orthopaedic Trauma Association committee for coding and Classification: Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma 1996; 10(Suppl 1):51–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanders R. Intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: present state of the art. J Orthop Trauma 1992; 6:252–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Neue entwicklungen bei der stabilisierung dia- und metaphysarer frakturen der langen rohrenknocken. Orthopade 1997; 26:408–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury 1997; 28 (Suppl 1):SA-42–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helfet DL, Suk M. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis of fractures of the distal tibia. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53:471–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oh CW, Kyung HS, Park IH, et al. Distal tibia metaphyseal fractures treated by percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 408:286–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Francois J, Vandeputte G, Verheyden F, et al. Percutaneous plate fixation of fractures of the distal tibia. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70:148–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khoury A, Liebergall M, London E, et al. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23:818–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collinge CA, Sanders RW. Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Ortho Surg 2000; 8:211–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collinge C, Sanders R, Dipasquale T. Treatment of complex tibial periarticular fractures using percutaneous techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 375:69–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maffulli N, Toms AD, McMurtie A, et al. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop 2004; 28:159–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borg T, Larsson S, Lidsjo U. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures: preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury 2004; 35:608–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Trauma ServiceTampa General Hospital, The Florida Orthopaedic InstituteTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations