Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Closed Reduction and Internal Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures

  • J. Chris Coetzee
  • Fernando A. Pena
Chapter

Abstract

Calcaneal fractures are the most common fractures in the foot, but treatment protocols vary significantly depending upon surgeon and institute preference. As far back as 1984, Yuang-Zhang et al.1 published an approach where they combined manual manipulation of the heel with “percutaneous poking” of the fracture fragments. In 2001, Omoto et al.2 published their results after just manual manipulation of the heel after a calcaneus fracture. Their results are difficult to interpret because no standardized outcome tool is included on their results.

Buckley et al. showed that without stratification of the groups, the functional results after nonoperative care of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures were equivalent to those after operative care.3 This paper confirmed that not all calcaneal fractures are created equal, and that one should have very specific guidelines on how and when to surgically treat a fracture. With this in mind, there is a subgroup of calcaneal fractures that are best treated with minimally invasive techniques.

Keywords

Calcaneal Fracture Subtalar Joint Manual Manipulation Percutaneous Fixation Longitudinal Traction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ma Y, Chen Z, Qu K, et al. Os calcis fracture treated by percuta-neous poking reduction and internal fixation. Chinese Med J 1984;97:105–110Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Omoto H Nakamura K. Method for manual reduction of displaced intra-articular fractured of the calcaneus: technique, indications and limitations. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:874–879Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckley R, Tough S, McCormack R, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1733–1744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forgon M. Closed reduction and percutaneous osteosynthesis: technique and results in 265 calcaneus fractures. In: Tscherne H, Schatzker J, (eds.) Major fractures of the pilon, the talus and the calcaneus. New York, Springer, 1993, pp. 207–213Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schildhauer TA, Sangeorzan BJ. Push screw for indirect reduction of severe joint depression-type calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:422–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tornetta P. Percutaneous treatment of calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;375:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gavlik JM, Rammelt S Zwipp H. Percutaneous, arthroscopically-assisted osteosynthesis of calcaneus fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:424–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nehme A, Chaminade B, Chiron P, et al. [Percutaneous fluoroscopic and arthroscopic controlled screw fixation of posterior facet fractures of the calcaneus]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004;90:256–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rammelt S, Amlang M, Barthel Z. Minimally-invasive treatment of calcaneal fractures. Injury 2004;35:S-B55-S-B63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minnesota Sports Medicine and Twin Cities OrthopedicsEden PrairieUSA

Personalised recommendations