Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

  • C. Christopher Stroud


The benefits of minimally invasive surgery have received significant attention in the lay press as well as in scientific meetings. Often patients will ask whether such a “minimalistic” approach is available for treatment of their specific problem. While ankle fusion has long been treated via an open approach with generally excellent results,1,2 there has been a push to perform this procedure through smaller incisions. While the extended lateral approach to the ankle has been the norm in the past, we have seen the evolution of the “mini-open” procedure as a technique used in a significant proportion of these procedures today.3 Following this line of thinking, the arthroscopic approach has been used in performing arthro-desis procedures of the ankle and foot. However, with the use of these novel techniques, it is incumbent on us, as the treating physicians, to ensure surgical results that equate or surpass these historical results.


Ankle Joint Arthroscopic Approach Ankle Fusion Arthroscopic Group Posterolateral Portal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Monroe MT, Beals TC, Manoli A. Clinical outcome of arthrodesis of the ankle using rigid internal fixation with cancellous screws. Foot Ankle Int 20:227–231, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 83-A:219–228, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paremain GD, Miller SD, Myerson MS. Ankle arthrodesis: results after the miniarthrotomy technique. Foot Ankle Int 17:247–252, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schon LC, Ouzounian TJ. The ankle. In: Jahss MH (ed.). Disorders of the Foot and Ankle, Vol. 2, Edition 2. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, pp. 1417–1460, 1991Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glick JM, Morgan CD, Myerson MS, Sampson TG, Mann JA. Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: long-term follow-up of 34 cases. Arthroscopy 12(4):428–434, 1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Myerson MS, Quill G. Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:84–95, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Brien TS, Hart TS, Shereff MJ, Stone J, Johnson J. Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparative study. Foot Ankle Int 20(6):368–374, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferkel RD, Hewitt M. Long-term results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 26(4):275–280, 2005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dent CM, Patil M, Fairclough JA. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 75-B(5):830–832, 1993Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crosby LA, Yee TC, Formanek TS, Fitzgibbons TC. Complications following arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 17(6):340–342, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeVriese L, Dereymaeker G, Fabry G. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis preliminary report. Acta Arthop Belg 60(4):389–392, 1994Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Lieberman I, Fitsialos D. Arthroscopically assisted arthrodesis for osteoarthrotic ankles. J Bone Joint Surg 75-A(8):1167–1174, 1993Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kats J, van Kampen A, de Waal-Malefijt MC. Improvement in technique for arthroscopic ankle fusion: results in 15 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:46–49, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turan I, Wredmark T, Felländer-Tsai L. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 320:110–114, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zvijac JE, Lemak L, Schurhoff MR, Hechtman K, Uribe J. Analysis of arthroscopically ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy 18(1):70–75, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 87-B(3):343–347, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cameron SE, Ullrich P. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy 16(1):21–26, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher RL, Ryan WR, Dugdale TW, Zimmermann GA. Arthroscopic ankle fusion. Conn Med 61(10):643–646, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corso SJ, Zimmer TJ. Technique and clinical evaluation of arthro­scopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy 11(5):585–590, 1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fleiss DJ. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy 16(7)::788, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wasserman LR, Saltzman CL, Amendola A. Minimally invasive ankle reconstruction: current scope and indications. Orthop Clin North Am 35:247–253, 2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raikin SM. Arthrodesis of the ankle: arthroscopic, mini-open, and open techniques. Foot Ankle Clin 8(2):347–359, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stroud CC. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle, subtalar, and first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Clin 7(1):135–146, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tasto JP, Frey C, Laimans P, Morgan CD, Mason RJ, Stone JW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Instr Course Lect 49:259–280, 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fitzgibbons TC. Arthroscopic ankle debridement and fusion: indications, techniques, and results. Instr Course Lect 48:243–248, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stone JW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 11(2):361–368, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWilliam Beaumont Hospital-TroyTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations