Skip to main content

The Extramedullary Tensor Technique for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics
  • 1820 Accesses

Abstract

The extramedullary (EM) tensor tools and surgical technique were developed to orient cutting guides for the implantation of the M/G unicompartmental prosthesis with greater ease and accuracy and to reduce the surgical morbidity of this limited reconstruction. Unicompartmental knee replacement attempts to reduce pain and improve function by restoring the extremity’s alignment and the joint’s soft tissue balance with the positioning of an implant limited to that compartment. All unicompartmental implants, be they monoblock wafers, mobile bearing devices, or fixed articular prostheses, must effect this restoration to enjoy whatever success they may provide.

Various surgical techniques for their implantation are available. Instrument systems without direct linkage of the femoral and tibial cuts require intuitive estimates. With such a technique, the implant must, in effect, be retrofitted. The cuts are made and then a device of a given volume and width is chosen that best fits the flexion and extension gaps created. Those cuts were not predetermined for a given implant and thus are approximations. Approximations can work well should there be unlimited prosthetic sizes from which to choose.

Adapted from Saenger PL, Minimally invasive surgery for unicondylar knee arthroplasy: The extramedullary approach, in Scuderi GR, Tria AJ, Berger RA (eds.), MIS Techniques in Orthopedics, 2006, with kind permission of Springer Science+Business Media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Caillouette JT. Fat embolism syndrome following the intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 251: 198–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolettis GT. Safety of one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 309: 102–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasegawa Y, Opishi Y, Shimizu T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Germany] 1998; 117(4–5): 183–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80(6): 983–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Newman JW, Ackroyd DE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomized trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80(5): 862–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty; a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13(4): 373–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: ten to thirteen year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 226: 14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 271: 96–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical experience at 6- to10-year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367: 50–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubniac JM. Modern cemented metal-backed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 3 to 10 year follow-up study. 68th annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85A: 1968–1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1978; 60: 182–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Dreisamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11970: 782–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Technical aspects of medial versus lateral minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2003; 26: 289–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul L. Saenger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saenger, P.L. (2010). The Extramedullary Tensor Technique for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76608-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76607-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76608-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics