Breast Cyst Aspiration



A breast mass is a common presenting symptom in a primary care office setting, at times accompanied by symptoms of pain and tenderness. It is also frequently found on a well woman examination and is a concern to both clinician and patient due to the fear of malignancy. Most breast masses are caused by fibrocystic changes of the breast, but these must be differentiated from breast cancer. Over half of the women in the United States will have fibrocystic changes sometime during their reproductive life; these changes are most common between the ages of 30 and 50. Seven percent of women in the Western world will have palpable breast cysts [1]. Fibrocystic changes consist of two different forms: fibroadenomas, which are solid, and cysts, which are liquid-filled sacs. Most fibrocystic changes fluctuate with hormonal cycles, worsening just prior to menses and improving after the initiation of menses. If a mass is noted by the clinician or the patient, consideration of returning after the patient’s menses for a reevaluation may be appropriate. If the mass is still present, a diagnostic mammogram and sonogram should be ordered. If the breast cyst shows a thickened cyst wall, intramural tumor, multiple septae, or is eccentric on ultrasound, it has a higher likelihood of being malignant [2]. A breast mass must be evaluated even if the mammogram is read as normal, as breast cancer can present in a similar fashion.


Fine Needle Aspiration Breast Mass Nondominant Hand Ethyl Chloride Ethyl Glycol 


  1. 1.
    Dixon JM, McDonald C, Elton RA, Miller WR. Risk of breast cancer in women with palpable breast cysts: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;353(9166):1742–1745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vargas HI, Vargas MP, Gonzalez KD, Eldrageely K, Khalkhaliet I. Outcomes of sonography-based management of breast cysts. Am J Surg 2004;188(4):443–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamed H, Coady A, Chaudary MA, Fentiman IS. Follow-up of patients with aspirated breast cysts is necessary. Arch Surg 1989;124(2):253–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lau SK, McKee GT, Weir MM, Tambouret RH, Eichhorn JH, Pitman MB. The negative predictive value of breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Breast J 2004;10:487–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daltrey IR, Kissin MW. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of needle gauge and local anesthetic on the pain of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology. Br J Surg 2000;87:777–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhate RD, Chakravorty A, Ebbs SR. Management of breast cysts revisited. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61(2):195–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Additional Resources Articles

  1. Lucas JH, Cone DL. Breast cyst aspiration. Am Fam Physician 2003;68(10):1983–1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Marchant DJ. Benign breast disease. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2002;29(1):1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Cameco pistol syringe holder syringe:
  2. Tao pencil grip syringe holder:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations