Advertisement

Stratifying Symptomatic Patients Using the Exercise Test and Other Tools

  • Russell D. White
  • Nora Goldschlager

Risk stratification of patients with chest pain occurs daily by physicians in the primary care setting. When patients present in the office with recent or new-onset chest pain, the physician must determine the appropriate evaluation. Does this pain represent coronary artery disease or is the pain due to some other cause? When a patient with pre-existing risk factors for coronary artery disease presents with typical angina symptoms, the physician must recommend appropriate evaluation. Finally, how does one manage the patient in the emergency department with chest pain? All of these clinical situations presenting to the primary care physician require assessment through the performance of specific evaluations in the proper setting and time period. Some patients can be evaluated over hours or days. Other patients require immediate consultation with a cardiologist. This chapter first reviews the concept of risk stratification, definitions of coronary disease and looks at multiple stratification tools. Second, these tools are discussed as they are applied to stratifying patients with chest pain. The final section presents multiple case studies illustrating the use of these tools in the approach to the patient with chest pain.

Keywords

Unstable Angina Exercise Stress Exercise Stress Test Veteran Administration Chronic Stable Angina 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenberg PS, Cangiano B, Leamy L, et al. Use of the multivariate approach to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the treadmill stress test. J Electrocardiology 1980;13:227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenberg PS, Ellestad MH, Clover RC. Comparison of the multivariate approach to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the treadmill stress test. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:493–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diamond, GA, Staniloff HM, Forrester JS, et al. Computer assisted diagnosis in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:444–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Detrano R, Janosi A, Lyons KP, et al. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test: the exercise thallium scintigram. Am J Med 1988;84:699–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, et al. Use of prognostic treadmill score in identifying diagnostic coronary disease subgroups. Circulation 1998;98(16):1622–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Do D, West JA, Morise A, Atwood JE, Froelicher VF. A consensus approach to diagnosing coronary artery disease based on clinical and exercise data. Chest 1997;111:1742–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lipinski M, Froelicher V, Atwood E, et al. Comparison of treadmill scores with physician estimates of diagnosis and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2002;143:650–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997;102:350–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berman JL, Wynne J, Cohn PF. A multivariate approach for interpreting treadmill exercise tests in coronary artery disease. Circulation 1978;58:505–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark DB. Ischemic heart disease. In Conn RB (ed) Current Diagnosis 8. WB Saunders, 1991, Philadelphia, PA, pp 416–27.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mark DB. Risk stratification in patients with chest pain. Primary Care 2001;28:99–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kligfield P and Lauer MS. Exercise electrocardiogram testing: Beyond the ST segment. Circulation 2006;114:2070–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellestad, M: Stress Testing: Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2003; New York, NY 43–75.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sambuceti, G, Marzilli M, Fedele, et al. Paradoxical increase in microvascular resistance during tachycardia downstream from a severe stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease: reversal by angioplasty. Circulation 2001;103;2352–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J, et al. Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 2001;103:2560–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ellestad, M: Stress Testing: Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2003; New York, NY 271–303.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenberg PS, Bible M, Ellestad MH. Prospective application of the multivariate approach to enhance the accuracy of the treadmill stress test. J Electrocardiology 1982;15:143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raxwal V, Shetler, Do D, et al. A simple treadmill score. Chest 2000;113:1933–40.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raxwal V, Shetler K, Morise A, et al. Simple treadmill score to diagnose coronary disease. Chest 2001;119:1933–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morise AP, Lauer MS, Froelicher VP. Development and validation of a simple exercise test for use in women with symptoms of suspected coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2002;144;818–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:793–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:849–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morrow K, Morris CK, Froelicher VF, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular death in men undergoing noninvasive evaluation for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:689–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Braunwald E, Jones RH, Mark DB, et al. Diagnosing and managing unstable angina. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Circulation 1994;90:613–22.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldschlager N, Selzer A, Cohn K. Treadmill stress tests as indicators of presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1976;85:277–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goldschlager N. Use of the treadmill test in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:383–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McNeer JF, Margolis JR, Lee KL, et al. The role of the exercise test in the evaluation of patients for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1978;57:64–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Froelicher VF, Myers J: Exercise and the heart. 5th ed. Sanders-Elsevier, 2006; Philadelphia, PA, p 253–4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weiner DA, Ryan T, McCabe CH. Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:772–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lachterman B, Lehmann KG, Abrahamson D, Froelicher VF. ‘‘Recovery only’’ ST-segment depression and the predictive accuracy of the exercise test. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:11–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Savage MP, Squires LS, Hopkins JT, et al. Usefulness of ST-segment depression as a sign of coronary artery disease when confined to the postexercise recovery period. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:1405–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abidov A, Rozanski A, Hachamovitch R, et al. Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1889–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Braunwald E, Mark DB, Jones RH, et al. Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and management: Clinical practice Guideline No. 10 AHCPR Publication NO. 94-0602, Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, March 1994.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernik PJLM et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000;284:835–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction executive summary: a task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:652–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fraker TD, Fihn SD. 2007 Chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation 2007;116:2762–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Braunwald E. Unstable angina: A classification. Circulation 1989;80:410–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. for the COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zipes DP, Wellens HJJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation 1998;98:2334–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, et al. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation 2001;104:2158–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Diamond GD, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979:300:1350–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Goncalves PA, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, et al. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J 2005;26:865–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Achar SA, Kundu S, Norcross WA. Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2005;72:119–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Swap CJ, Nagurney JT. Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2005;294;2623–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stein RA, Chaitman BR, Balady GJ, et al. Safety and utility of exercise testing in emergency room chest pain centers: an advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 2000;102:1463–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1366–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    American Heart Association. 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 5. Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation 2005;112 (Supplement):III-55–72.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Farkouh ME, Smars PA, Reeder GS, et al., for the Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators. A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1882–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell D. White
    • 1
  • Nora Goldschlager
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Community and Family MedicineUniversity of Missouri—Kansas City, Truman Medical Center LakewoodKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Division of CardiologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations