Advertisement

Interpreting the Exercise Test

  • Corey H. Evans
  • Myrvin H. Ellestad

This chapter focuses on the interpretation of the exercise test. The first half discusses the important parameters of the test to be evaluated. The second half discusses how the information from the test can be used to estimate the probability of coronary disease and likelihood of future cardiac events. This important area of risk stratification allows the physician to place the patient in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups and to identify which patients benefit from referral to cardiology for consideration of revascularization.

Keywords

Left Anterior Descend Blood Pressure Response Maximal Heart Rate Heart Rate Recovery Pretest Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Londeree BR, Moeschberger ML. Influence of age and other factors on maximal heart rate. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1984;4: 44–49.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Froelicher VF, Myers J. Exercise and the Heart, 5th ed. Elsevier, 2006, 110.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Froelicher VF, Brammel H. Davis G, et al. A comparison of three maximal treadmill exercise protocols. J Appl Physiol 1974; 36: 720–725.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheffield LT, Malouf JA, Sawyer JA, et al. Maximal heart rate and treadmill performance of healthy women in relation to age. Circulation 1979; 57:79–84.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper KH, Purdy JG, White SR et al. Age-fitness adjusted maximal heart rates. Med Sport 1977;10:78–88.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruce RA, Gey GO Jr., Cooper MN, et al. Seattle Heart Watch: Initial clinical, circulatory and electrocardiographic responses to maximal exercise. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33:459–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Azarbal B, Hayes SW, Lewin HC, Hachamovitch R, Cohen I, Berman DS. The incremental prognostic value of percentage of Heart Rate Reserve achieved over myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the prediction of cardiac death and all-cause mortality. JACC 2004;44:425–430.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sandvik L, Eriksson J, Ellestad MH, Eriksson G, Thaulow E, Mundal R, Rodahl K. Heart rate increase and maximal heart rate during exercise as predictors of cardiovascular mortality: A 16 year follow-up study of 1960 healthy men. Coronary Artery Disease 1995;6: 667–679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellestad MH. tress Testing: Principles and Practice, 4th ed. hiladelphia, A Davis, 996, 46.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNeer JF, Margolis JR, Le KL, et al. The role of the exercise test in the evaluation of patients for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1978; 57:64–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lauer MS, Okin PM, Larson MG Evans JC, Levy D. Impaired heart rate response to graded exercise: Prognostic implications of chronotropic incompetence in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1996;93: 1520–1526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellestad MH, Wan MKC. Predictive implications of stress testing follow-up of 2700 subjects after maximum treadmill stress testing. irculation 1975;1:63.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falcone C, Buzzi MP, Klersy C, Schwartz PJ. Rapid heart rate increase at onset of exercise predicts adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2005; 112:1959–1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leeper NJ, Dewey FE, Ashley EA, et al. Prognostic value of heart rate increase at onset of exercise testing. Circulation 2007; 115:468–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, et al. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1351–1357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, et al. eart rate recovery: Validation and methodologic issues. Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 8;980–1987.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ellestad MH. Stress Testing; Principles and Practice, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2003, 335.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Froelicher VF, Myers J. Exercise and the Heart, 5th ed. Elsevier, 2006, 120.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor AJ, Beller GA. Postexercise systolic blood pressure response: Clinical Application to the assessment of ischemic heart disease. Amer Fam Physician 58; 1126–1130, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ellestad MH. Stress Testing; Principles and Practice, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2003, 344–345.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dubach P, Froelicher VF, Klein J et al. Exercise-induced hypotension in a male population-Criteria, causes, and prognosis. Circulation 1988;78: 1380–1387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT et al. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline update for exercise testing: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2002. Am Coll Cardiol Web Site.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bodegard J, Erikssen G, Bjornholt JV, et al. Reasons for terminating an exercise test provide independent prognostic information. 2014 apparently healthy men followed for 26 years. Eur Heart J doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi278.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ellestad MH. Stress Testing; Principles and Practice, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2003, 296–297.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Udall JA, Ellestad MH. Predictive implications of ventricular premature contractions associated with treadmill stress testing. Circulation 1977;56:985–989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jouven X, Zurick M, Desnos M, et al. Long-term outcome in asymptomatic men with exercise-induced premature ventricular depolarizations. N Eng J Med 2000;343: 826–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    ACSM’s resource manual for Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. American College of Sports Medicine; 5th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 2006, 122–126.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Myers J, Kaykha A, George S et al. Fitness versus physical activity patterns in predicting mortality in men. Am J Med 2004;117:912–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Evans CH, Harris G, Menold V, Ellestad MH. A Basic Approach to the interpretation of the exercise test. Primary Care 2001;28: 80–81.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ellestad MH. Stress Testing; Principles and Practice, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2003, 43–75.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stuart R, Ellestad MH. psloping ST-segments in exercise testing. m J Cardiol 1976;7:9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    oldschlager N, Selzer A, Cohn K. Treadmill stress test as indicators of presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1976; 85:277–286.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taylor AJ, Beller GA. Patients with greater than 2 mm of ST depression do not have a greater ischemic burden by thallium-201 scintigraphy. Circulation 86(suppl II):138, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dunn RF, et al. xercise-induced ST elevation. irculation 1980;1:89.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ellestad MH. Stress Testing; Principles and Practice, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2003, 216–218.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee JH, Crump R, Ellestad MH. Significance of precordial T-wave increase during treadmill stress testing. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:1297–1299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rasouli ML, Ellestad MH. Usefulness of ST depression in ventricular premature complexes to predict myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2001;87: 891–894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Selvester RH, Gillespie TL. imulated ECG surface map’s sensitivity to local segments of myocardium. In epeschkin E, Rush S. Eds. roceeding, Vermont Conference Body Surface Mapping of Cardiac Fields. Advances in Cardiology. Vol. 10. Basel, witzerland: S. Karger, Basel, 1974:120.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ellstad MH, Crump R, Surber M. The significance of lead strength on ST changes during treadmill stress tests. J Electrocardiol 1993;25 (supp): 31.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heller IH, Cates C, Popma J et al. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate Coronary Artery Disease; Comparison with 201 TI imaging and coronary angiography. Circulation 1997; 96:484–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wilson RF, Marcus ML, Christensen BV, et al. Accuracy of exercise electrocardiography in detecting physiologically significant coronary arterial lesions. Circulation 1991;83: 412–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ellestad MH. The time has come to reexamine the gold standard when evaluating noninvasive testing. Am J Cardiol 2001;87: 100–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300: 1350–1358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Epstein, SE: Implications of probability analysis on the strategy used for non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 46:491–499, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mark DB, Hlathy MA, Harrell FE Jr., et al. Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1987;106: 793–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, et al. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:849–853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morrow K, Morris CK, Froelicher VF, Hideg A. Prediction of cardiovascular death in men undergoing noninvasive evaluation for CAD. Ann Intern Med 1993;118: 689–695.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corey H. Evans
    • 1
    • 2
  • Myrvin H. Ellestad
    • 3
  1. 1.St. Anthony’s Hospital
  2. 2.Private Practice Family Physician, Florida Institute of Family MedicineUSA
  3. 3.Exercise Laboratory, Memorial Heart Institute; Department of CardiologyUniversity of California, Irvine School of MedicineLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations