Advertisement

Service Supply Chain in the Department of Defense: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Uday Apte
  • Geraldo Ferrer
  • Ira Lewis
  • Rene Rendon
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

In 2003, the Department of Defense (DoD) spent over $118B in purchasing services. In fact, in each of the last ten years, DOD has spent more dollars on services than on supplies, equipment and goods, which includes weapon systems and other military items. As DOD's services acquisition volume continues to increase in scope and dollars, the agency must provide greater attention to such issues as proper acquisition planning, adequate requirements definition, establishment of appropriate contracts, and proper contractor oversight. The unique characteristics of services and the increasing importance of services acquisition offer a significant opportunity for conducting research in the management of the service supply chain in DOD.

Keywords

Government Accountability Government Procurement Customer Contact Service Supply Chain Adequate Requirement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Abramson, M. A., Harris, R. S. III: The Transformation of Government Procurement. In: Abramson, M. A., Harris, R. S. III (eds.). The Procurement Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland, 3-11 (2003).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Air Force Instruction: Acquisition: Performance Based Services Acquisition (PBSA). 63-124 (2005).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Auernig, M.: Director of Contracting, Presidio of Monterey (2006).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chase, R.: The Customer Contact Approach to Services: Theoretical Bases and Practical Extensions. Operations Research 21(4), 698-705 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Denhardt, K. G.: The Procurement Partnership Model: Moving to a Team-Based Approach. In: Abramson, Mark A., Harris, Roland S. III (eds.). The Procurement Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD 59-86 (2003).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General: Acquisition: Contracts for Professional, Administrative and Management Support Services. (D-2005-015) (2003).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Federal Acquisition Council. Federal Acquisition Regulation—Part 37. Services Contracting. Downloaded from http://farsite.hill.af.mil on March 27 (2006).
  8. [8]
    Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation (FPDS-NG). Available at http://www.fpdsng.com/downloads/top_requests/total federal spending_by_dept.
  9. [9]
    Fitzsimmons, J. A., Fitzsimmons, M. J. Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, NY (2006).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gansler, J. S. A Vision of the Government as a World-Class Buyer: Major Procurement Issues for the Coming Decade. In: Abramson, Mark A., Harris, Roland S. III (eds.) The Procurement Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Maryland, 13-57 (2003).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    GAO. US Government Accountability Office. Best Practices: Taking a Strategic Approach Could Improve DOD’s Acquisition of Services. (GAO-02-230) (2002).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    GAO. US Government Accountability Office. Contract Management: High Level Attention Needed to Transform DOD Services Acquisition. (GAO-03-935) (2003).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    GAO. US Government Accountability Office. Contract Management: Opportunities to Improve Surveillance on Department of Defense Contracts. (GAO-05-274) (2005).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Karmarkar, U. S., Pitbladdo, R. Service Markets and Competition. Journal of Operations Management 12 (3-4), 397-411 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Levy, D. G., et al. Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) and Organizational Restructuring in the DoD: Implications for Education and Training and Infrastructure. RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 36-50 (MG-153) (2004).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. Performance of Commercial Activities. (Circular No. A-76 (REVISED)) (2003).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    US Air Force: 60th Contracting Squadron Mission Overview, Travis AFB (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uday Apte
    • 1
  • Geraldo Ferrer
    • 1
  • Ira Lewis
    • 1
  • Rene Rendon
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Business and Public Policy Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey

Personalised recommendations