Service Science, Management and Engineering: A Way of Managing Sociotechnical Systems

  • Michael E. Gorman
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

This paper discusses an expanded notion of services, ones that can lead to the transformation of systems in ways that are beneficial for business, engineering and society—because all of these are parts of a larger system. But what I say here also applies, on a reduced level, to systems problems that are apparently more local, like modeling and responding to a changing business environment in a specific market and area.


Service Innovation Trading Zone Service Scientist Interactional Expert Sociotechnical System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Allenby, B. (2005). Technology at the global scale: Integrative cognitivism and Earth Systems Engineering Management. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding & A. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 303-344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Alvarez, W. (1997). T.rex and the crater of doom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Baird, D., & Cohen, M. (1999). Why trade? Perspectives on science, 7(2), 231-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies. Social Studies of Science, 32 (2), 235-296.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDs, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Galison, P. (1997). Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gibson, J., & Scherer, W. T. (2006). How to Do Systems Analysis. Indianapolis: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gorman, M. E., Kincannon, A., & Mehalik, M. M. (2001). Spherical Horses and Shared Toothbrushes: Lessons learned from a workshop on scientific and technological thinking. Paper presented at the Discovery Science 2001, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hackett, E. (2000). Interdisciplinary research initiatives at the U.S. National Science Foundation. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 248-259). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    O’Leary, M., Orikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2002). Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670-1826. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Palmer, C. L. (2001). Work at the boundaries of science: Information and the interdisciplinary research process. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Shrager, J. (2005). Diary of an insane cell mechanic. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding & A. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 119-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Spohrer, J. C., McDavid, D., Maglio, P. P., & Cortada, J. W. (2006). NBIC Convergence and Technology-Business Coevolution: Towards a Services Science to Increase Productivity Capacity. In B. Bainbridge & M. C. Roco (Eds.), Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society (pp. 227-253). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Thagard, P. (1988). Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Gorman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations