Advertisement

Finite Element Analysis of Piezoelectric Transducers

  • Anne-Christine Hladky-Hennion
  • Bertrand Dubus

Electromechanical transducers, first used in sonar systems, convert electrical energy into mechanical energy, thanks to the piezoelectric effect, then to acoustic energy, with the generation and the radiation of an acoustic wave in a fluid. To design new transducers and to understand their physical behaviour, several physical mechanisms have to be described (piezoelectric-elastic-fluid-structure coupling-acoustic radiation). To solve such problems, analytical and semi-analytical approaches often rely upon simplifying hypotheses, in terms of geometry of the transducers, behaviour of the piezoelectric part of the device, radiation condition or frequency range of interest. Among these approaches, the equivalent electrical scheme (Beranek 1954) is based on a classical lumped constant representation with masses and springs, and the transfer matrix (Neppiras 1973) uses plane wave approximations.With the help of analytical expressions, these approaches become operational tools, leading to the realization of numerous transducers.

Keywords

Epoxy Dition Nite Acoustics Sonar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allik H, Hughes TJR (1970) Finite element method for piezoelectric vibration. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 2, pp. 151-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ATILA (2002) Finite Element Code for Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Transducers Modeling, Version 5.2.1, User’s Manual, ISEN, Acoustics Laboratory, Lille, France.Google Scholar
  3. Beranek LL (1954) Acoustics. Mc Graw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Decarpigny JN (1984) Application de la m éthode des él éments finis à l’ étude de transducteurs pi ézo électriques. Doctoral thesis, ISEN, Lille, France.Google Scholar
  5. Do gan A, Uchino K, Newnham RE (1997) Composite piezoelectric transducers with truncated conical endcaps ‘cymbals’. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectrics Freq. Contr. Vol 44, no 3, pp. 597-605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubus B (2002). Numerical modeling of sonic and ultrasonic devices. In: New acoustics. Selected topics. Ed. by C. Ranz-Guerra and J.A. Gallego-Juarez. pp. 37-73.Google Scholar
  7. Holland R (1967) Representation of dielectric, elastic and piezoelectric losses by complex coeffi-cients. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. SU-14, pp. 18-20.Google Scholar
  8. Morse PM, Fesbach H (1953) Methods of theoretical physics. Mc Graw Hill, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Neppiras EA (1973) The pre-stressed piezoelectric sandwich transducer. Ultrasonics International 1973 Conference Proceedings, pp. 295.Google Scholar
  10. Newnham RE (1997) Molecular mechanisms in smart materials. MRS Bull., pp. 20-34.Google Scholar
  11. Schenk HA (1968) Improved integral formulation for acoustic radiation problems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, pp. 41-58.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Segerlind LJ (1976) Applied finite element analysis, Wiley, ISBN: 0-471-77440-5.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson OB (1988) Introduction to theory and design of sonar transducers. Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Zhang J (2000) Miniaturized flextensional transducers and arrays. Ph D thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  15. Zhang J, Hladky-Hennion AC, Hughes WJ, Newnham RE (2001) Modeling and underwater char-acterization of cymbal transducers and arrays. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectrics Freq. Contr. Vol 48, no 2, pp 560-568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method. Mc Graw Hill, London.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Christine Hladky-Hennion
    • 1
  • Bertrand Dubus
    • 1
  1. 1.ISEN DepartmentIEMNLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations