High Energy-Loss Spectra and Images

  • David B. Williams
  • C. Barry Carter


The high energy-loss spectrum (E>50 eV) consists primarily of ionization or core-loss edges on a rapidly decreasing plural-scattering background. Elemental-composition data and elemental maps can be extracted from these ionization edges. In this chapter, we’ll examine how to get this information, quantify it, and image it. A good use for such data is lightelement analysis wherein EELS complements XEDS. First, we’ll remind you of the experimental variables over which you have control, because these are rather critical. Then we’ll discuss how to obtain a spectrum and what it should look like if you’re going to quantify it.


Ionization Cross Section Convergence Angle Collection Angle Edge Intensity Edge Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Books and Reviews

  1. Ahn, CC Ed. 2004 Transmission Electron Energy-Loss Spectrometry in Materials Science and the EELS Atlas 2nd Ed. Wiley-VCH Weinheim Germany. Must-read chapters on quantification and imaging.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brydson, R 2001 Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy Bios (Royal Microsc. Soc.) Oxford UK. Great basic introduction; lots of practical tips.Google Scholar
  3. Egerton, RF 1996 Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope 2nd Ed. Plenum Press New York. Still the EELS bible. Read more here about the Bethe ridge.Google Scholar
  4. Hofer, F and Warbichler, P 2004 Elemental Mapping Using Energy-Filtered Imaging in Transmission Electron Energy-Loss Spectrometry in Materials Science and the EELS Atlas 2nd Ed. 159–233 Ed. CC Ahn Wiley-VCH Weinheim Germany. A thorough review of EFTEM/ESI, full of outstanding examples.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Joy, DC 1986a The Basic Principles of EELS, 1986b Quantitative Microanalysis using EELS in Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy 249–276 and 277–299 Eds. DC Joy, A. Romig Jr. and JI Goldstein Plenum Press New York. Introduction to the principles and in-depth discussion of the experimental details necessary for quantificationGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohler-Redlich, P and Mayer, J 2003 Quantitative Analytical Transmission Electron Microscopy in High-Resolution Imaging and Spectrometry of Materials 119–187 Eds. F Ernst and M Rühle Springer New York. Integrated review of quantitative EELS and other TEM techniques with an emphasis on interfacial studies.Google Scholar
  7. Reimer, L Ed. 1995 Energy-Filtering Transmission Electron Microscopy Springer New York. The first book on EFTEM/ESI with all you need to know about the theory and practice, but very few applications.Google Scholar


  1. Batson, PE 1993 Simultaneous STEM Imaging and Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy with Atomic-Column Sensitivity Nature 366 727–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browning, ND Chisholm, MF and Pennycook, SJ 1993 Atomic-Resolution Chemical Analysis Using a Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope Nature 366 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cutrona, J, Bonnet, N, Herbin, M and Hofer, F 2005 Advances in the Segmentation of Multi-Component Microanalytical Images Ultramicrosc. 103 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Egerton, RF 1979 K-Shell Ionization Cross-Sections For Use in Microanalysis Ultramicrosc. 4 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egerton, RF 1981 SIGMAL; A Program For Calculating L-shell Ionization Cross-Sections in Proc. 39th EMSA Meeting198–199 Ed. G.W. Bailey Claitors Baton Rouge LA.Google Scholar
  6. Egerton, RF 1993 Oscillator-Strength Parameterization of Inner-Shell Cross Sections Ultramicrosc. 50 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofer, F, Golob, P and Brunegger, A 1988 EELS Quantification of the Elements Sr to W by Means of M 45 Edges Ultramicrosc. 25 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeanguillaume, C, Trebbia, P and Colliex, C 1978 About the Use of Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy for Chemical Mapping of Thin Foils with High Spatial Resolution Ultramicrosc. 3 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leapman, RD and Hunt, JA 1991 Comparison of Detection Limits for EELS and EDXS Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 2 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leapman RD (2004) EELS Quantitative Analysis in Transmission Electron Energy Loss Spectrometry in Materials Science and the EELS Atlas 2nd Ed. 49–96 Ed CC Ahn Wiley-VCH Weinheim Germany. A great reference source.Google Scholar
  11. Malis, T, Cheng, S and Egerton, RF 1988 EELS Log-Ratio Technique for Specimen-Thickness Measurement in the TEM J. Electron Microsc. Tech. 8 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michel, J. and Bonnet, N 2001 Optimization of Digital Filters for the Detection of Trace Elements in EELS. III – Gaussian, Homomorphic and Adaptive Filters Ultramicrosc. 88 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muller, DA and Silcox, J 1995 Delocalization in Inelastic Scattering Ultramicrosc. 59 195–213. If you're physics-oriented and want to read more about delocalization in EELS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rez, P 2003 Electron Ionization Cross Sections for Atomic Subshells Microscopy and Microanalysis 9 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taftø, J and Krivanek, OL 1982 Site-Specific Valence Determination by Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 560–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Unser, M, Ellis, JR, Pun, T and Eden, M 1986 Optimal Background Estimation in EELS J. Microsc. 145 245–256.Google Scholar
  17. Varela, M, Lupini, AR, van Bentham, K, Borisevich, AY, Chisholm, MF, Shibata, N, Abe, E and Pennycook, SJ 2005 Materials Characterization in the Aberration–Corrected Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 35 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations