Spatial Resolution and Minimum Detection


Often when you do X-ray analysis of thin foils you are seeking information that is close to the limits of spatial resolution. Before you carry out any such analysis you need to understand the various controlling factors and in this chapter we explain these. Minimizing your specimen thickness is perhaps the most critical aspect of obtaining the best spatial resolution, so we summarize the various ways you can measure your foil thickness at the analysis point, but the quality of the TEM-XEDS system is also important.


Thin Foil Specimen Thickness Foil Thickness Thin Specimen Beam Spreading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berriman, J, Bryan, R, Freeman, R and Leonard, KR 1984 Methods for Specimen Thickness Determination in Electron Microscopy Ultramicrosc. 13 351–364. Old, but still useful, review of thickness measurements in the TEM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein, JI, Williams, DB and Cliff, G 1986 Quantification of Energy Dispersive Spectra in Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy 155–217 Eds. DC Joy, AD Romig Jr. and JI Goldstein, Plenum Press New York. Introduction to many of the concepts in this chapter and the preceding one.Google Scholar
  3. Jones IP 1992 Chemical Microanalysis Using Electron Beams Institute of Materials London. Redefined Goldstein et al. equation in SI units on p173.Google Scholar
  4. Joy, DC 1995 Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Oxford University Press New York. The only textbook covering this essential topicGoogle Scholar

Thickness and Resolution

  1. Malis, T, Cheng, SC and Egerton RF 1988 The EELS Log-ratio Technique for Specimen-Thickness Measurement in the TEM J. Electr. Microsc. Tech. 8 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael, JR, Williams, DB, Klein, CF and Ayer, R 1990 The Measurement and Calculation of the X-ray Spatial Resolution Obtained in the Analytical Electron Microscope J. Microsc. 160 41–53.Google Scholar
  3. Mitchell, DRG 2006 Determination of Mean Free Path for Energy Loss and Surface Oxide Film Thickness Using Convergent Beam Electron Diffraction and Thickness Mapping: a Case Study Using Si and P91 Steel J. Microsc. 224 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams, DB, Michael, JR, Goldstein, JI and Romig AD Jr. 1992 Definition of the Spatial Resolution of X-ray Microanalysis in Thin Foils Ultramicrosc. 47 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Currie, LA 1968 Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination. Application to Radiochemistry Anal. Chem. 40 586–593. Detection limits and different definitions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein, JI, Costley, JL, Lorimer, G. and Reed, SJB 1977 Quantitative X-ray Microanalysis in the Electron Microscope SEM 1977 1 315–325 Ed. O Johari IITRI Chicago IL. Seminal paper.Google Scholar
  3. Lyman, CE, Goldstein, JI, Williams, DB, Ackland, DW, Von Harrach, S, Nicholls, AW and Statham, PJ 1994 High Performance X-ray Detection in a New Analytical Electron Microscope J. Microsc. 176 85–98. Description of what is still the best X-ray analysis instrument in the world.Google Scholar
  4. Lyman, CE and Michael, JR 1987 A Sensitivity Test for Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectrometry in the Analytical Electron Microscope in Analytical Electron Microscopy-1987 231–234, Ed. DC Joy, San Francisco Press San Francisco CA. Spatial resolution versus sensitivity limits.Google Scholar
  5. Ohshima, K, Kaneko, K, Fujita, T and Horita, Z 2004 Determination of Absolute Thickness and Mean Free Path of Thin Foil Specimen by ζ-Factor Method J. Electron Microsc. 53 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Watanabe, M and Williams, DB 1999 Atomic-Level Detection by X-ray Microanalysis in the Analytical Electron Microscope Ultramicrosc. 78 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Watanabe, M and Williams, DB 2006 The Quantitative Analysis of Thin Specimens: a Review of Progress from the Cliff-Lorimer to the New ζ-Factor Methods J. Microsc. 221 89–109. The ζ-factor approach for quantification, mapping, thickness determination, and everything else.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ziebold, TO 1967 Precision and Sensitivity in Electron Micro-probe Analysis Anal. Chem. 39 858–861. Just what it says!CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations