Skip to main content

Spatial Resolution and Minimum Detection

  • Chapter
Transmission Electron Microscopy

Abstract

Often when you do X-ray analysis of thin foils you are seeking information that is close to the limits of spatial resolution. Before you carry out any such analysis you need to understand the various controlling factors and in this chapter we explain these. Minimizing your specimen thickness is perhaps the most critical aspect of obtaining the best spatial resolution, so we summarize the various ways you can measure your foil thickness at the analysis point, but the quality of the TEM-XEDS system is also important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Classics

  • Berriman, J, Bryan, R, Freeman, R and Leonard, KR 1984 Methods for Specimen Thickness Determination in Electron Microscopy Ultramicrosc. 13 351–364. Old, but still useful, review of thickness measurements in the TEM.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, JI, Williams, DB and Cliff, G 1986 Quantification of Energy Dispersive Spectra in Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy 155–217 Eds. DC Joy, AD Romig Jr. and JI Goldstein, Plenum Press New York. Introduction to many of the concepts in this chapter and the preceding one.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones IP 1992 Chemical Microanalysis Using Electron Beams Institute of Materials London. Redefined Goldstein et al. equation in SI units on p173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, DC 1995 Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Oxford University Press New York. The only textbook covering this essential topic

    Google Scholar 

Thickness and Resolution

  • Malis, T, Cheng, SC and Egerton RF 1988 The EELS Log-ratio Technique for Specimen-Thickness Measurement in the TEM J. Electr. Microsc. Tech. 8 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, JR, Williams, DB, Klein, CF and Ayer, R 1990 The Measurement and Calculation of the X-ray Spatial Resolution Obtained in the Analytical Electron Microscope J. Microsc. 160 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, DRG 2006 Determination of Mean Free Path for Energy Loss and Surface Oxide Film Thickness Using Convergent Beam Electron Diffraction and Thickness Mapping: a Case Study Using Si and P91 Steel J. Microsc. 224 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, DB, Michael, JR, Goldstein, JI and Romig AD Jr. 1992 Definition of the Spatial Resolution of X-ray Microanalysis in Thin Foils Ultramicrosc. 47 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

P/B, ζ, AND MMF

  • Currie, LA 1968 Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination. Application to Radiochemistry Anal. Chem. 40 586–593. Detection limits and different definitions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, JI, Costley, JL, Lorimer, G. and Reed, SJB 1977 Quantitative X-ray Microanalysis in the Electron Microscope SEM 1977 1 315–325 Ed. O Johari IITRI Chicago IL. Seminal paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, CE, Goldstein, JI, Williams, DB, Ackland, DW, Von Harrach, S, Nicholls, AW and Statham, PJ 1994 High Performance X-ray Detection in a New Analytical Electron Microscope J. Microsc. 176 85–98. Description of what is still the best X-ray analysis instrument in the world.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, CE and Michael, JR 1987 A Sensitivity Test for Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectrometry in the Analytical Electron Microscope in Analytical Electron Microscopy-1987 231–234, Ed. DC Joy, San Francisco Press San Francisco CA. Spatial resolution versus sensitivity limits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohshima, K, Kaneko, K, Fujita, T and Horita, Z 2004 Determination of Absolute Thickness and Mean Free Path of Thin Foil Specimen by ζ-Factor Method J. Electron Microsc. 53 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M and Williams, DB 1999 Atomic-Level Detection by X-ray Microanalysis in the Analytical Electron Microscope Ultramicrosc. 78 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M and Williams, DB 2006 The Quantitative Analysis of Thin Specimens: a Review of Progress from the Cliff-Lorimer to the New ζ-Factor Methods J. Microsc. 221 89–109. The ζ-factor approach for quantification, mapping, thickness determination, and everything else.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziebold, TO 1967 Precision and Sensitivity in Electron Micro-probe Analysis Anal. Chem. 39 858–861. Just what it says!

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Williams .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, D.B., Carter, C.B. (2009). Spatial Resolution and Minimum Detection. In: Transmission Electron Microscopy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76501-3_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics