Advertisement

Forensic Psychology

  • Diana M. Falkenbach
Part of the Series in Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMENG)

I teach in a forensic psychology program for undergraduate and graduate students, and on the first day of class each semester I ask students what they want to do with their degree. Inevitably, they answer that they want to be like Clarice Starling from Silence of the Lambs. More recently, I have also been getting answers like “I want to be like the profilers from the TV show, Criminal Minds.” I do get a few students who hope to be like the characters on CSI,1 however, given that CSIis actually not psychology at all, I promptly send them to the forensic science department. The media, movies, and television have dramatized and popularized “forensics” in all fields. However, forensic psychologists are not psychics that can look at a crime scene and predict the criminal’s every move. Whenever there is a big media-publicized killing, I immediately get phone calls from all the news channels asking me to tell them what made that person commit that crime – but we cannot really answer that...

Keywords

Crime Scene Mental Health Court Wrongful Conviction False Confession Forensic Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Munsterberg, H. On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime. New York: Doubleday; 1908.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogloff, J.R.P, Beavers, D.J. & DeLeon, P.H. Psychology and the law: A shared vision for the 21st century. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1999 30(4): 331–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grisso, T. A developmental history of the American Psychology-Law society. Law and Human Behavior. 1991 15: 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalven, H. Some comments on the Law and Behavioral Science Project at the University of Pennsylvania. Journal of Legal Education. 1958 11: 94–99.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogloff, J. R. P. Law and psychology in Canada: The need for training and research. Canadian Psychology. 1990 31: 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grisso, T., Sales, B. D., & Bayless, S. Law-related courses and programs in graduate psychology departments. American Psychologist. 1982 37: 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otto R, Heilbrun K. The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist. 2002 57(1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    John Jay College of Criminal Justice Psychology Webpage [www.jjay.cuny.edu/psychology/aboutforensicpsychology.asp]. New York, New York.
  11. 11.
    Howard L, Hilgendorf L. Psychologist as Expert Witness. In: Joanna Shapland, editor. Lawyers & Psychologists – The Forward, p 7–19, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huff C, Rattner A. Convicted But Innocent: False Positives & the Criminal Justice Process. Controversial Issues in Crime & Justice. 1988 130–144.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norcross J, Sayette M, Mayne T, Karg R, Turkson M. Selecting a doctoral program in professional psychology: Some comparisons among PhD counseling, PhD clinical, and PsyD clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1998 29(6): 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana M. Falkenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice The City University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations