Technological Boundaries of Voltage and Frequency Scaling for Power Performance Tuning

  • Maurice Meijer
  • José Pineda de Gyvez
Part of the Series on Integrated Circuits and Systems book series (ICIR)


Leakage Current Threshold Voltage Supply Voltage Tuning Range Power Saving 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. [1]
    Haensch, et al., “Silicon CMOS devices beyond Scaling”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, July/September 2006, Vol. 50, No. 4/5, pp. 339–361Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.J. Frank, “Power constrained CMOS scaling limits”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, March/May 2002, Vol. 46, No. 23, pp. 235–244Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    AMD PowerNOW! Technology, AMD white paper, November 2000,
  4. [4]
    M. Fleishman, “Longrun power management; Dynamic power management for crusoe processor”, Transmeta white paper, January 2001,
  5. [5]
    S. Gochman, et al., 01C;The Intel Pentium M processors: Microarchitecture and performance”, l Technology Journal, May 2003, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 22–36Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. Kuroda, et al., “Variable supply-voltage scheme for low-power high-speed CMOS digital design”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, March 1998, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Nowka, et al., “A 32-bit PowerPC system-on-a-chip with support for dynamic voltage scaling and dynamic frequency scaling”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, November 2002, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1441–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Gutnik and A. Chandrakasan, “Embedded power supply for low-power DSP”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, December 1997, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Miyake, et al., “Design methodology of high performance microprocessor using ultra-low threshold voltage CMOS”, Proceedings of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2001, pp. 275–278Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Tschanz, J. Kao, S. Narendra, R. Nair, D. Antoniadis, A. Chandrakasan, and Vivek De, “Adaptive body bias for reducing impacts of die-to-die and within-die parameter variations on microprocessor frequency and leakage”, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Conference, February 2002, Vol. 1, pp. 422–478Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Chen and S. Naffziger, “Comparison of Adaptive Body Bias (ABB) and Adaptive Supply Voltage (ASV) for improving delay and leakage under the presence of process variation”, IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, October 2003, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 888–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    T. Sakurai and R. Newton, “Alpha-power law MOSFET model and its applications to CMOS inverter delay and other formulas”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, April 1990, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 584–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K.Roy, S. Mukhopadhyay, and H. Mahmoodi-Meimand, ”Leakage current mechanisms and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits ”, Proceedings of the IEEE, February 2003, Vol. 91, No. 2 pp. 305–327Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Meijer, F. Pessolano, and J. Pineda de Gyvez, “Technology exploration for adaptive power and frequency scaling in 90 nm CMOS”, Proceedings of International Symposium on Low Power Electronic Design, August 2004, pp.14–19Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Meijer, F. Pessolano, and J. Pineda de Gyvez, “Limits to performance spread tuning using adaptive voltage and body biasing”, Proceedings of International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2005, pp.23–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurice Meijer
    • 1
  • José Pineda de Gyvez
    • 2
  1. 1.NXP SemiconductorsNXP
  2. 2.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven

Personalised recommendations