Information Management by Patients and Parents in Health and Disease

  • Mark M. Simonian
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


An effective partnership between a family and a pediatrician depends on good communication. One of the most valuable services a pediatrician can provide a child and family is his/her experience and skills in eliciting a history to diagnose and treat a problem and in sharing health information to educate and empower patients and families. Communication tasks that a practitioner performs may range from explaining a diagnosis or test results to obtaining informed consent from a literacy-challenged parent for a medical procedure to listening to and counseling a distraught teenager.

Information and communication technology (ICT) can provide both benefits and tradeoffs to patients, parents, and pediatricians. For families, telephone, fax, and electronic mail with their health care providers may provide flexibility, speed, and ease in exchange for the reassurance and other nuances of direct contact with a trusted provider. For pediatricians, ICT may increase access, but must be managed to prevent overload and to maintain quality of care and clinical and fiscal productivity.


Electronic Mail Personal Health Record Author Disclosure Secure Messaging Online Consultation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hertz A. Section drafting policy on reimbursement for phone care. AAP News. 2005;26(6):34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melzer SM, Poole SR. Reimbursement for telephone care. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):290–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirkland JL, Copeland KC. Telephone charges and payments in a diabetes clinic. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4):E2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Telehealth Care. Payment for Telehealth Care. American Academy of Pediatrics Website; 2006. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  5. 5.
    Liebhaber A, Grossman JM. Physicians Slow to Adopt Patient E-mail Data Bulletin No. 32. Center to Study Health System Change; 2006. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  6. 6.
    Katz SJ, Moyer CA. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(9):978–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Division of Health Policy Research. Periodic Survey of Fellows 51: Use of Computers and Other Technology, Executive Summary. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2003. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  8. 8.
    Bauchner H, Adams W, Burstin H. “You've got mail”: issues in communicating with patients and their families by e-mail. Pediatrics. 2002;109:954–956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ. Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(1):91–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kane B, Sands DZ. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):104–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerstle RS, American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Medical Informatics. E-mail communication between pediatricians and their patients. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):317–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou Y Y, Garrido T, Chin HL, Wiesenthal AM, Liang LL. Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manage Care. 2007;13(7):418–424.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Healthcare Information Community (AHIC). Chronic Care Workgroup. Department of Health and Human Services Website; 2008, last update. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  14. 14.
    Medem. Medem Website; 2008. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  15. 15.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Patient Education Online. Commercially available from the American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008. Available at: Accessed December 21, 2008.
  16. 16.
    National Library of Medicine. MedlinePlus; 2008. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  17. 17.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Website; 2008. Available at: http://www. Accessed December 4, 2008.
  18. 18.
    Food and Drug Administration. FDA Website; 2008. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  19. 19.
    Merck and Co. The Merck Manual Online; 2008. Available at: Accessed December 4, 2008.
  20. 20.
    Medem. Disease Management and Adherence Programs. Available at: http://www.medem. com/node/1098. Accessed December 21, 2008.
  21. 21.
    Medem. Secure Messaging and Online Consultation; 2008. Available at: http://www.medem. com/node/1088. Accessed December 21, 2008.
  22. 22.
    Lewis D. Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(4):272–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dickerson S, Reinhart AM, Feeley TH, et al. Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(6):499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Treweek SP, Glenton C, Oxman AD, Penrose A. Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(4):346–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS, et al. Columbia university's informatics for diabetes education and telemedicine (IDEATel) project: rationale and design. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(1):49–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Earnest MA, Ross SE, Wittevrongel L, Moore LA, Lin CT. Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(5):410'417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaplan B, Brennan PF. Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(4):309–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Clercq PA, Hasman A, Wolffenbuttel BH. A consumer health record for supporting the patient-centered management of chronic diseases. Med Inform Internet Med. 2003;28(2): 117–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hejlesen OK, Plougmann S, Ege BM, Larsen OV, Bek T, Cavan D. Using the internet in patient-centred diabetes care for communication, education, and decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1464–1468.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark M. Simonian
    • 1
  1. 1.General solo pediatricianClovis

Personalised recommendations