The development of AIMS and the more comprehensive EMR has focused primarily on the myriad of technologic challenges. As these challenges are met and electronic systems become the accepted method for record keeping, medicolegal proceedings will inevitably rely upon electronic data to determine liability when patient injury occurs. This chapter will address the current understanding of the legal aspects of AIMS, recognizing that in the future, the courts and legislatures will ultimately determine how these systems are used in medicolegal proceedings.
The EMR, whereby all information related to the medical care of a patient is recorded and stored, has been under development for decades, and many pioneers have implemented sophisticated systems for creating some version of an EMR. 1 Although these systems have proven themselves to be useful, few, if any, have been capable of creating a truly complete medical record that incorporates all aspects of a patient’s medical care. AIMS were first introduced more than 20 years ago as computerized record-keeping systems designed to automatically record data from physiologic monitors, accept input of drug dosages and comments, and print highly legible paper records for patients’ charts. Varied systems from multiple vendors have been adopted and are in use in thousands of anesthetizing locations worldwide. Although many departments have adopted AIMS, the overwhelming majority of anesthesia records are still created by hand. As a component of the EMR, the information collected by the AIMS has the potential to be a high-resolution record of the care rendered to a patient during a procedure that requires anesthesia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pryor AT. Current state of computer-based patient record systems. In: Ball MJ, Collen MF, eds. Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record. New York: Springer, 1992:67–82
Partial testimony from the director of the office of personnel management before a House of Representatives subcommittee investigating governmental reform, July 2005
Gore G. Factors that influence who wins a malpractice suit. In: Gravenstein IS, Holzer IF, eds.Cost Containment in Anesthesia. Boston: Butterworths, 1988:135
Vigoda MM, Lubarsky DA. Failure to recognize loss of incoming data in an anesthesia record-keeping system may have increased medical liability. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:1798–802
Vigoda MM, Lubarsky DA. The medicolegal importance of enhancing timeliness of documentation when using an anesthesia information system and the response to automated feedback in an academic practice. Anesth Analg 2006; 103:131–6
Cook RI, McDonald JS, Nunziata E. Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:385–90
Feldman JM. Do Anesthesia information systems increase malpractice exposure? Results of a survey. Anesth Analg 2004; 99:840–3
Driscoll WD, Columbia MA, Peterfreund RA. An observational study of anesthesia record completeness using an anesthesia information management system. Anesth Analg 2007; 104(6):1454–61
Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System, Letter Report, July 200 3, p. 7
Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System, Letter Report, July 2003, p. 6
Lane P. AIS' role in anesthesiology risk management remains uncertain. Anesth Analg 2005; 100(5):1537
Terry v. Arkansas, 826 S.W.2d 818, citing the rules of admissibility of business records from Rule 803(6)(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Records of a regularly conducted activity
Buckner F. Electronic records (Chap. 33). In: American College of Legal Medicine, Sanbar SS, ed. Legal Medicine, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Mosby, 2004:360
Oppenheim EB. The Medical Record as Evidence. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law Publishing, 1998:54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lane, P., Feldman, J.M. (2008). Legal Aspects of AIMS. In: Anesthesia Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76418-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76418-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76417-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76418-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)