Skip to main content

Public Finance is the branch of economics that studies the taxing and spending activities of government. The term is something of a misnomer, because the fundamental issues are not financial (that is, relating to money). Rather, the key problems relate to the use of real resources. For this reason, some practitioners prefer the label public sector economics or simply public economics. Public finance encompasses both positive and normative analysis. Positive analysis deals with issues of cause and effect, for example, “If the government cuts the tax rate on gasoline, what will be the effect on gasoline consumption?” Normative analysis deals with ethical issues, for example, “Is it fairer to tax income or consumption?”

Modern public finance focuses on the microeconomic functions of government, how the government does and should affect the allocation of resources and the distribution of income. For the most part, the macroeconomic functions of government—the use of taxing, spending, and monetary policies to affect the overall level of unemployment and the price level—are covered in other fields.

This chapter is a reprint of an essay that first appeared in The Encyclopedia of Public Choice edited by Charles K. Rowley and Friedrich Schneider and published in 2004 by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Volume I, 252–262.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1970). ‘‘The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism.’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1983). The Economics of Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F. M. (1957). ‘‘The simple analytics of welfare maximization.’’ American Economic Review, 47, 22-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. (1997). It Takes a Nation — A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D. (1986). Untangling the Income Tax. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, S. (1998). ‘‘Global trends and issues in value-added taxation.’’ International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 399-428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmendorf, D. W. and N. G. Mankiw, (1999). ‘‘Government debt,’’ in J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford (eds.) Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1976). ‘‘On the theory of tax reform.’’ Journal of Public Economics, 6, 77-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. and J. B. Liebman (2001). ‘‘Social security.’’ Working Paper No. 8541, National Bureau of Economic Research, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. (1998). ‘‘Health, government, and Irving Fisher.’’ Working Paper No. 8490, National Bureau of Economic Research, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, W. G. and J. B. Slemrod (2000) ‘‘A matter of life and death: reassesing the estate and gift tax.’’ Tax Notes, August 14, 927-932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargberber, A. C. (1962). ‘‘The incidence of the corporation income tax.’’ Journal of Political Economy, 70, 215-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. (1998). ‘‘Tax policy from a public choice perspective.’’ National Tax Journal, 51, 359-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. and K. Y. Yun (2001). Investment Volume 3: Lifting the Burden. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. D. (1995). ‘‘Lessons from the US unemployment insurance experiments.’’ Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 91-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A. L and R. J. Zeckhauser (1982). ‘‘Targeting transfers through restrictions on recipients.’’ American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 72, 372-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999). ‘‘An essay on fiscal federalism.’’ Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120-1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, J. A. (ed.) (1980). What Should Be Taxed: Income or Expenditure? Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). ‘‘The pure theory of public expenditure.’’ Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, R. N. (2002). ‘‘Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments,’’ in K.-G. Maler and J. Vincent (eds.) The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Amster-dam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosen, H.S. (2008). Public Finance. In: Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics