Advertisement

The literature which takes a public choice approach to dictatorship, largely barren before 1990 except for Tullock’s Autocracy (1987), is now growing and may be entering a period of prosperity. This survey focuses on the most recent literature, and on three questions in particular: (1) The behavior of dictators, including the strategies that dictators use to stay in power; (2) The relative efficiency of dictatorship: Which is better, dictatorship or democracy, in promoting economic growth and efficiency?; and (3) What policies should the democracies adopt to deal with dictatorships if they are interested in promoting freedom?

Keywords

Public Choice Trade Agreement American Political Science Review Democratic Politician Economic Sanction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barro, R (1996a). ‘‘Democracy and growth.’’ Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R. (1996b). Getting It Right. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1983). ‘‘Theory of competition among interest groups for political influence.’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besley, T. and S. Coate (1998). ‘‘Sources of inefficiency in a representative democracy: a dynamic analysis.’’ American Economic Review, 88, 139-156.Google Scholar
  5. Bernholz, P. (2001). ‘‘Ideocracy and totalitarianism: a formal analysis incorporating ideology.’’ Public Choice, 108(1-2), 33-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilson, J. (1982). ‘‘Civil liberties—an econometric investigation.’’ Kyklos, 35, 94-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congleton, R. (2002). ‘‘From dictatorship to democracy without revolution,’’ paper delivered at the American Economic Association meetings, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  8. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Epp, C. (1998). The Rights Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Friedrich, K. and Z. Brzezinski (1965). Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Howitt, P. and R. Wintrobe (1995). ‘‘The political economy of inaction.’’ Journal of Public Economics, 56, 329-353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ignatieff, M. (2000). The Rights Revolution. Toronto: Anansi Press for the CBC.Google Scholar
  13. Islam, M. and S. L. Winer (2001). ‘‘Tinpots, totalitarians (and democrats): an empirical investigation of the effects of economic growth on civil liberties and political rights,’’ ms., (Working Paper) Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Kaempfer, W., A. Lowenberg, and W. Mertens (2001). ‘‘International economic sanctions against a dictator,’’ paper delivered at the Public Choice Society Meetings, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
  15. Keefer, P., C. Clague, S. Knack, and M. Olson (1996). ‘‘Property and contract rights under democracy and dictatorship.’’ The Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 243-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Londregan, J. and K. T. Poole (1996). ‘‘Does high income produce democracy’’? World Politics, 49,1-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moselle, B. and B. Polak (2001). ‘‘A model of a predatory state.’’ Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 17, 1-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. North, D. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. North, D. and B. Weingast (1989). ‘‘Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth century England.’’ Journal of Economic History, 49, 808-832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictators. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Peltzman, S. (1976). ‘‘Towards a more general theory of regulation.’’ Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211-240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Przeworski, A., M. E. Alvarez, J. A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, J. (1997). ‘‘When is a state predatory?’’, ms., (Working Paper) University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  25. Root, H. (1994). The Foundation of Privilege: Political Foundations of Markets in Old Regime France and England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sen, A. (1993). ‘‘Political Rights and Economic Needs,’’ The John M. Olin Lecture in Law and Economics at the University of Toronto Law School, October 1.Google Scholar
  27. Spagat, M. (2001). ‘‘Political instability and growth in dictatorships,’’ ms., (Working Paper) Royal Holloway College, England.Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, G. J. (1971). ‘‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’’ Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, 137-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tullock, G. (1987). Autocracy. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijihoff.Google Scholar
  30. Verwimp, P. (2001). ‘‘The political economy of coffee and dictatorship in Rwanda,’’ ms., (Working Paper) Department of Economics, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  31. Wintrobe, R. (1990). ‘‘The tinpot and the totalitarian: an economic theory of dictatorship.’’ American Political Science Review, 84, 849-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wintrobe, R. (1998a). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wintrobe, R. (1998b). ‘‘Some lessons on the efficiency of democracy from a study of dictatorship,’’ in S. Borner and M. Paldam (eds.) The Political Dimension of Economic Growth. McMillan: International Economic Association.Google Scholar
  34. Wintrobe, R. (2002). ‘‘The contest for power: property rights, human rights, and economic efficiency,’’ paper presented at the American Economic Association meetings, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  35. Wittman, D. (1983). ‘‘Parties as utility maximizers.’’ American Political Science Review, 77, 142-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhisui, L. (1994). The Private Life of Chairman Mao. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Wintrobe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations