Skip to main content

Throughout the first 15 years following the end of World War II the economics profession throughout the Western world was characterized by a touching belief in the omniscience and impartiality of government as the servant of the public good and by a cynical belief in the endemic failure of free markets to maximize social welfare as defined by the Pareto Principle supplemented by the Kaldor–Hicks–Scitovsky potential compensation test. It was also characterized by the hegemony of Keynesian economics with its support for large and fiscally interventionist governments and its contempt for monetary instruments of macroeconomic intervention.

The behemoths who bestrode the economics profession throughout that period were Paul Samuelson, Kenneth Arrow, John Kenneth Galbraith, James Tobin, Robert Solow, and Joan Robinson. Classical political economy was dead, buried by the Great Depression and by the writings of John Maynard Keynes (1936). Free market economics was on the ropes, with few advocates and even those forced into perpetual defense in an environment in which public choice analysis played no role. The future for economic liberty and capitalism was bleak indeed.

This chapter is a revised and updated version of an essay that first appeared in The Encyclopedia of Public Choice edited by Charles K. Rowley and Friedrich Schneider and published in 2004 by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Volume I, pp. 146–159.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Breit, W. and Ransom, R.L. (1998). The Academic Scribblers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Wagner, R.E. (1977). Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E. (1985). Milton Friedman: A Guide to His Economic Thought. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (2001). ‘‘Friedman and Lucas on the Phillips curve: From a disequilibrium to an equilibrium approach’’. Eastern Economic Journal, 27(2), 127-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Meiselman, D. (1963). ‘‘The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958’’, in Stabilization Policies. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 165-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. and de Marchi, N. (1990). Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1983). Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Eighties. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1952). ‘‘Proportion of capital formation to national product’’. American Economic Review, 42, 507-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1865). On Liberty. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwigvon (1963). Human Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L.C. (1932). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C.K. (1999a). ‘‘Five market friendly nobelists.’’ The Independent Review, 3(3), 413-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C.K. (1999b). ‘‘Review of—Milton and Rose Friedman, two lucky people’’. Public Choice, 99(3-4), 474-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1963). ‘‘Comment on Ernest Nagel’s ‘assumptions in economic theory.’’’ American Economic Review, May, 211-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T.J. (1987). Some of Milton Friedman’s Scientific Contributions to Macroeconomics. Stanford: Hoover Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, A. (1987). ‘‘Milton Friedman: Born 1912,’’ in John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2. London: Macmillan, pp. 422-427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowley, C.K., Bradley, A.E. (2008). Milton Friedman (1912–2006). In: Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics