Advertisement

A Synopsis of Research Needs Identified at the Interagency, International Symposium on Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms (ISOC-HAB)

  • H Kenneth Hudnell
  • Quay Dortch
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 619)

Abstract

Evidence indicates that the incidence of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (CHABs) is increasing in spatial extent and temporal frequency worldwide. Cyanobacterial blooms produce highly potent toxins and huge, noxious biomasses in surface waters used for recreation, commerce, and as drinking water sources. The Interagency, International Symposium on Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms (ISOC-HAB) characterized the state of the science and identified research needed to address the risks posed by CHABs to human health and ecosystem sustainability. This chapter provides a synopsis of CHAB research needs that were identified by workgroups that addressed charges in major topic areas. The research and infrastructure needed are listed under nine categories: 1) Analytical Methods; 2) CHAB Occurrence; 3) CHAB Causes; 4) Human Health; 5) Ecosystem Sustainability; 6) CHAB Prevention; 7) CHAB Control and Mitigation; 8) Risk Assessment and; 9) Infrastructure. A number of important issues must be addressed to successfully confront the health, ecologic, and economic challenges presented by CHABs. Near-term research goals include the development of field-ready tests to identify and quantify cells and toxins, the production of certified reference standards and bulk toxins, formal assessments of CHAB incidence, improved understanding of toxin effects, therapeutic interventions, ecologically benign means to prevent and control CHABs, supplemental drinking water treatment techniques, and the development of risk assessment and management strategies. Long-term goals include the assimilation of CHAB databases into emerging U.S. and international observing systems, the development of quantitative models to predict CHAB occurrence, effects, and management outcomes, and economic analyses of CAHB costs and management benefits. Accomplishing further infrastructure development and freshwater HAB research is discussed in relationship to the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Research and Control Act and existing HAB research programs. A sound scientific basis, the integration of CHAB infrastructure with that of the marine HAB community, and a systems approach to risk assessment and management will minimize the impact of this growing challenge to society.

Keywords

QSAR Model Toxin Production Harmful Algal Bloom Recreational Water Ecosystem Sustainability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AOAC (2007) The Association of Analytical Communities, International. http://www.aoac.org/Google Scholar
  2. ATCSA (2001) Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act, The Stationery Office Ltd, London, UK 118 pp. (Chapter 24).Google Scholar
  3. Australian Environmental Protection Agency (2003) http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/environmental_management/coast_and_oceans/marine_habitats/lyngbya_management_strategy/Google Scholar
  4. CYANONET (2007) A Global Network for the Hazard Management of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Toxins in Water Resources. http://www.cyanonet.org/Google Scholar
  5. ECOHAB (2007) Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms. http://www.cop.noaa.gov/stressors/extremeevents/hab/current/fact-ecohab.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. FASHAB (2007) Scientific Assessment of Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms. Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Research and Control Act (2004) U.S. Congress reauthorization. http://www.cop.noaa.gov/pubs/habhrca/2004_publ456.108.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. HARRNESS (2005) Harmful Algal Research and Response: A National Environmental Science Strategy 2005-2015. JS Ramsdell, DM Anderson and PM Glibert (eds.), Ecological Society of America, Washington DC, 82. http://www.esa.org/HARRNESS/harrnessReport10032005.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. IATA (2006) Dangerous Goods Regulations (47th edition), International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Canada, 815.Google Scholar
  10. MERHAB (2007) Monitoring and Event Response for Harmful Algal Blooms. http://www.cop.noaa.gov/stressors/extremeevents/hab/current/fact-merhab.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Meriluoto J, Codd GA (eds) (2005) Toxic: Cyanobacterial monitoring and cyanotoxin analysis. Abo Academie University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ocean.us (2007) What is IOOS? http://www.ocean.us/what_is_ioosGoogle Scholar
  13. Palafox and Buenconsejo-Lum (2005) Ciguatera fish poisoning: review of clinical manifestations, Toxin Reviews 20/2:141-160.Google Scholar
  14. US Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Beach Monitoring and Notification: Report to Congress. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/beaches/report/Google Scholar
  15. USA Patriot Act (2001) Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act) Act of 2001. H.R. 3162 in the senate of the United States, 342Google Scholar
  16. World Health Organization (1999) Toxic cyanobacteria in water: A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. I Chorus and J Bartram (eds.), E & FN Spon, New York, 416 http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/resourcesquality/toxicyanbact/en/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H Kenneth Hudnell
  • Quay Dortch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations