Research on the Status Quo and System Architecture of the Web Information Resource Evaluation
Web information resource evaluation (website evaluation) becomes more and more important, as the web information resources become larger and more complex. Thus, a lot of theory and methods have been developed to evaluate websites. In this paper, the author analyzes the primary methods applied currently in the evaluation of the web information resource and points out the main problems in this area from the perspectives of qualitative evaluation, quantitative evaluation, synthetic evaluation and automatic evaluation, after making an in-depth and comprehensive research of the literature and evaluation tools at home and abroad. Furthermore, the paper concludes that the evaluation of information resource on the Internet should take the internal and external characteristics into consideration, in the meantime, the paper puts forward a system architecture scheme of the automatic website evaluation based on the usability engineering.
KeywordsAnalytical Hierarchy Process Correspondence Analysis Index System Synthetic Evaluation Automatic Evaluation
- 1.China Internet Network Information Center, The 19th survey report (February 18, 2007); http://www.cnnic.net.cn/en//index/0O/02/index.htm.
- 3.J. Su, “Research on the network information resources evaluation”, Journal of Academic Libraries. 23(1), 7–13 (2005).Google Scholar
- 4.W.J. Chen and Y.S. Chen, “Commentary on evaluation of network information resources”, Journal of the Library Science Society of Sichuan. 40(1), 25–31 (2004).Google Scholar
- 5.J. Shen and Q.H. Zhu, “Current research on evaluation criteria of networked information resources in China and overseas”, Information Science. 23(7), 1104–1109 (2005).Google Scholar
- 7.H.T. Zhang, “A study of indicators for the evaluation of library website”, Document Information & Knowledge. 25(2), 96–99 (2005).Google Scholar
- 8.D.M. Li, “Preliminary exploration of website integrative evaluation”, Information studies Theory & Application. 28(2), 303–306 (2005).Google Scholar
- 10.H.M. Wei, “Application of analytical hierarchy process in libraries webs evaluation”, New Technology Library and Information Service. 29(10), 74–83 (2005).Google Scholar
- 12.X.S. Shen and D.M. Li, “Research on China network media websites evaluation: Using correspondence analysis”, China Soft Science. 19(1), 126–133 (2005).Google Scholar
- 13.“Alexa Internet Inc, Alexa Web Search Platform” (December 13, 2006); http://www.alexa.com/.
- 15.L. Gan, “Examination & analysis of information architecture of e-commerce website”, Information Studies Theory & Application. 28(6), 605–608 (2005).Google Scholar
- 16.D.M. Li, “The research on the automated website information evaluation”, Document Information & Knowledge. 25(1), 104–107 (2005).Google Scholar
- 17.M.W. Newman, and J.A. Landay, “Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: A sketch of web site design practice”, Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (New York, 2000), pp. 263–274.Google Scholar
- 18.J.X. Hao and X.X. Shen, “Study on the framework for website analysis based on usability engineering”, Document Information & Knowledge. 26(2), 81–86 (2006).Google Scholar
- 19.Y.H. Rong and Z.P. Liang, “An approach to information architecture”, Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 21(2), 229–232 (2003).Google Scholar
- 22.B.J. Cockrell, and Jayne E. Ahow, “Do I Find an Article? Insights from a Web Usability Study”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 28(2), 54–64 (2002).Google Scholar