Abstract
In order to solve the decision question with incomplete information and uncertainty of risk factors during the risk decision, the concept of reduced lattice is introduced into project risk management in this paper, then the default rule mining model based on the combination of rough set and reduced lattice is constructed, and created a series of subsystems from the known decision system at different reduced levels, then form a reduced lattice, and then deduce its own rule set at each reduced lattice. At last, an example is introduced to demonstrate the method and model above detailed.
Chapter PDF
References
Skowron A, Polkowski L, Komorowski J. Learning Tolerance relations by Boolean descriptors, Automatic Feature Extraction from Data Tables. In: Tsumoto [C]. Kobayashi, Yokomor, Tanka, and Nakamura. RSFD, 1996: 11–17
Mollestad T. A Rough set approach to default rules data mining[D]. Norway: the Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1996
Wang Yaying, Shao Huihe. A Rough Set Model to Mine Default Rule Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University. 2000, 5: 691–694 Hu Keyun; Lu Yuchang; Shi Chunyi. Advances in concept lattice and its application[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University. 2000,9:77–81
Marzena Kryszkiewicz. Rough set approach to incomplete information systems[J]. Information science, 1998, 112: 39–49 Marzena Kryszkiewicz. Rules in incomplete information systems[J]. Information science, 1999, 113:271–292
Zdzislwa Pawlak. Rough sets and intelligent data analysis[J], Information sciences, 2002, 147: 1–12
Wu Bing. Web raining model based on rough set theory. Journal of southeast university[J]. 2002. 3: 54–58
Wille R. Restructuring Lattice theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts[C]. In: Rival I ed. Ordered Set. Dorerecht-Boston: Reidel. 1982: 445–470
Lu Xinyuan. A sutydy on the risk decision rules mining of IT project[M], Hubei People Press, 2006
MO Xiangqun. Risk management of software project schedule[J]. Computer and Information Technology, 2002, 4: 67–70
Jian Lirong, Da Qing li, Chen Weida. A method of rule induction based on rough set theory in inconsistent information system[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science. 2003, 8: 91–95
Pang Sulin, Li Rongzhou, The decision mechanism of credit risk for banks with imperfect information[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology, 1999. 8
Pawlak Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Information and Computer Science, 1982, 11: 341–356.
Wang Guoyin. The Rough set theory and the knowledge acquirement [M]. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong university press, 2001, 5.
Holt, Gary D. Classifying construction contractors: a case using cluster analysis (Periodical style). Building Research & Information, 1997, 25(11): 374–378
Chinyio, E. A., Olomolaiye, P. O., Kometa, S. T. and Harris, F. C., A needs-based methodology for classifying construction clients and selecting contractors (Periodical style). Construction Management & Economics, 1998, 16(1): 91–95
Koen Milis, Roger Mercken, The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of Information and Communication Technology projects (Periodical style). International Journal of Project Management, 2004 (22): 87–97
M. Banerjee, S. Mitra, S.K. Pal, Rough fuzzy MLP: knowledge encoding and classification, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 9 (Nov) (1998) 1203–1216.
XU Zeshui. A method for multi-objective decision making with incomplete information[J]. Operations research and management science 2001. 6
Liao Xiuwu; Tang Huanwen. A new group decision-making approach with incomplete information[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology 2002. 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lu, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, J. (2007). Research of Default Rules Mining Model Based on Reduced Lattice. In: Wang, W., Li, Y., Duan, Z., Yan, L., Li, H., Yang, X. (eds) Integration and Innovation Orient to E-Society Volume 2. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 252. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75494-9_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75494-9_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-75493-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-75494-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)