Advertisement

A Process Model of Partnership Evolution Around New IT Initiatives

  • Timo Kestilä
  • Lauri Salmivalli
  • Hannu Salmela
  • Annukka Vahtera
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 252)

Abstract

Prior research on inter-organizational information systems has focused primarily on dyadic network relationships, where agreements about information exchange are made between two organizations. The focus of this research is on the processes through which IT decisions are made within larger inter-organizational networks with several network parties. The research draws from network theories in organization science to identify three alternative mechanisms for making network level commitments: contracts, rules and values. In addition, theoretical concepts are searched from dynamic network models, which identify different cycles and stages in network evolution. The empirical research was conducted in two networks. The first one comprises of four municipalities which began collaboration in the deployment of IT in early childhood education (ECE). The second network involves a case where several organizations, both private and public, initiated a joint effort to implement a national level electronic prescription system (EPS). The frameworks and concepts drawn from organizational theories are used to explain success of the first case and the failure of the latter case. The paper contributes to prior IOS research by providing a new theory-based framework for the analysis of early stages of building organizational networks around innovative IT initiatives.

Keywords

Early Childhood Education Coordination Mechanism Information System Research Interorganizational Relationship Partnership Evolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Markus, M. and D. Robey, Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, 1988. 34(5): p. 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ring, P.S. and A.H. Van de Ven, Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationship. Academy of Management, 1994. 19(1): p. 90–118.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finnegan, P., R.D. Galliers, and P. Powell. Guidelines for Effective Information Systems Planning in Inter-organisational Environments. in Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems. 1999. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salmela, H. and T. Spil. Strategic Information Systems Planning in Inter-Organizational Networks: Adapting SISP Approaches to Network Context. in 2nd European Conference on IS Management, Leadership and Governance. 2006. Paris.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williamson, O.E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Constructing. 1985: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorelli, H.B., Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 1986. 7(1): p. 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouchi, W.G., A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanism. Management Science, 1979. 25(9): p. 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilkinson, I., A History of Network and Channels Thinking in Marketing in the 20th Century. Australasian Marketing Journal, 2001. 9(2): p. 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leblebic, H., et al., Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991. 36(3): p. 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malone, T.W., J. Yates, and R.I. Benjamin, Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies: Effects of Information Technology on Market Structure and Corporate Strategies. Communications of the ACM, 1987. 30(6): p. 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choudhury, V., Strategic choices in the development of interorganizational information systems. Information Systems Research, 1997. 8(1): p. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnston, H.R. and M.R. Vitale, Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. MIS Quarterly, 1998. 12(2): p. 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van de Ven, A.H., On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1976. 1(4): p. 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams, T., Interorganisational Information Systems: issues affecting interorganizational cooperation. ELSEVIER, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1997. 6(3): p. 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson, D.T., An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1995. 23(4): p. 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williamson, O.E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. 1975, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ouchi, W.G., Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980. 25(1).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodríguez, C., et al., Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network. Administration & Society, 2007. 39(2): p. 150–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jarillo, J.C., On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 1988. 9(1): p. 31–41.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rapoport, R.N., Three Dilemmas of Action Research. Human Relations, 1970. 23: p. 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baskerville, R.L. and T. Wood-Harper, Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 1998. 7(2): p. 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Susman, G.I. and R.D. Evered, An Assesment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978. 23(4): p. 582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Checkland, P., From Framework through Experience to Learning: The Essential Nature of Action Research. Discussant’s comments, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, and R. Hirscheim, Editors. 1991, Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jönssön, S., Action Research, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, and R. Hirscheim, Editors. 1991, Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Argyris, C., Reasoning, Learning and Action: Individual and Organiational. 1982, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo Kestilä
    • 1
  • Lauri Salmivalli
    • 2
  • Hannu Salmela
    • 1
  • Annukka Vahtera
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Systems ScienceTurku School of EconomicsTurku
  2. 2.Pori Unit, Welfare EconomicsTurku School of EconomicsTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations