Advertisement

Knowledge Processing and Service System for Digital Education based on Semantic Web

  • Xia Li
  • YingLong Wang
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 251)

Abstract

Recent efforts in the area of learning technology have resulted in a considerable improvement in the interoperability of digital education resources. On the basis of sharing and integration of digital educational resources, knowledge Processing and service considers the Semantic knowledge extraction of metadata of educational resources, Construction ontology for educational resources, and combining the users personality characteristics, providing semantic-based personalized retrieval and delivery services. In this paper, we work out the architecture of knowledge processing and service system for digital education, then discuss the semantic representation of digital education resources, semantic mining and discovery of digital education resources and personalized knowledge delivery service.

Keywords

Service System Semantic Representation Educational Resource Knowledge Processing Knowledge Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    LUISA (Learning Content Management System Using Innovative Semantic Web Services Architecture), http://www.luisa-project.eu/.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Devedzic, “Education and The Semantic Web”, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), Vol.14, 2004, pp. 39–65.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontologies, Knowledge Acquisition, 1993. [Online].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Niwattanakul, M. Eboueya, D. Lillis, “Describing and Researching of Learning Resources with Ontology Model,” jva, pp. 214–222, IEEE John Vincent Atanasoff 2006 International Symposium on Modern Computing (JVA’06), 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duval, E., Ed. (2002). 1484.12.1 IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. June 2002Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sampson, D.G., Lytras, M.D., Wagner, G., & Diaz, P. (2004). “Guest Editorial:Ontologies and the Semantic Web for E-learning”, Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 26–28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lytras, M., Tsilira, A., Themistocleous, M. (2003). Towards the semantic e-learning:An ontological oriented discussion of the new research agenda in e-learning, In Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, USA, pp. 2985–2997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsson, M., Palmer, M., Brase, J. (2003). The LOM RDF binding-principles and implementation, In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ARIADNE Conference, Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gasevic, Dragan; Hatala, Marek, “Ontology Mappings to Improve Learning Resource Search”, British Journal of Educational Technology, v37 n3 p375–389 May 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ariadne: Alliance of remote instructional authoring and distributions networks for europe, 2001. http://ariadne.unil.ch/.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edutella, 2001. http://edutella.jxta.org/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xia Li
    • 1
  • YingLong Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Humanity & Social Science CollegeWuhan University of Science and EngineeringChina
  2. 2.Departemnt of Information TechnologyHuaZhong Normal UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations