Advertisement

The Effect of Information Asymmetry on Consumer Driven Health Plans

  • Martin J. D’Cruz
  • Ranjan B. Kini
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 251)

Abstract

The healthcare industry is unique when compared to other industries in that multiple stakeholders manage healthcare services. Consumers are the ultimate users of these services; however, they have relatively little influence on their own health service choices. The industry is changing rapidly with new technologies making access to healthcare information via the Internet and other sources easier in theory. The disconnect between what consumers can learn and their ability to use what they learn results in the inability for them to truly be drivers in their own healthcare decisions. Information Asymmetry is one of the major factors that make the healthcare delivery system in the United States and other countries inefficient. The stakeholders, government, health plans, providers and employers play a pivotal role in reducing information asymmetry. Embracing Information and Communications Technology (ICT) can effectively move from an unwired to a wired healthcare delivery system and support reducing information asymmetry. For Consumer Driven Health Plans (CDHP) to succeed, consumers need information on price, quality, and cost for services. The conjecture here is that with minimization of information asymmetry, implicitly or explicitly, CDHP will drive healthcare cost down and make the healthcare market more efficient thereby reining in healthcare cost in the long-run.

Keywords

Health Plan Information Asymmetry Health Information Technology Reduce Information Asymmetry Healthcare Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Middleton, “Achieving U.S. Health Information Technology Adoption: The Need For A Third Hand”, Health Affairs, September/October 2005, Vol 25, pp. 1269–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.M. Retchin, MD, MSPH, “Overcoming Information Asymmetry in Consumer Directed Health Plans”, The American Journal of Managed Care, Vol 13, No 4, April 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cardon and Showalter, “Insurance Choice And Tax-Preferred Health Savings Accounts”, Journal of Health Economics, 2007, Vol: 26(2), pp. 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.H. Lee, M.D. and K. Zapert, Ph.D, “Do High-Deductible Health Plans Threaten Quality of Care?”, New England Journal of Medicine 353, no 12, pp.1202–1204, September 22, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Wilensky, “Consumer-Driven Health Plans: Early Evidennce And Potential Impact On Hospitals”, Health Affairs, January/February 2006 Vol: 25 pp. 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.P. Newhouse, “Consumer-directed health plans and the RAND health insurance experiment”, Health Affairs 2004; 23: pp.107–113 (Cited in BMJ 334:238).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Healthy News Service, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Consumer Survey Shows High Rate of Satisfaction With HSAs Cites Increased Reliance On Decision Support Tools, October 10, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0225JECTestimonyNoSummary.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Millenson, “Medical Informatics Internet, Performance-based Healthcare — The Coming Transformation of Medical Practice”, Business Briefing: Next Generation Healthcare, October 2000, pp.28–31.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Haas-Wilson, Uncertain Times, Kenneth Arrow and the Changing Economics of Health Care, 2003 Duke University Press, Arrow and the Information Market failure in Health Care: The Changing Content and Sources, pp. 169–180.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. J. Arrow, “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care”, American Economic Review 53, pp.941–973, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Gruman, PhD, Executive Director, Center for the Advancement of Health, Keynote Address, Transforming Consumer Decision Making, Promises and Pitfalls in Consumer Decision Making, Conference, Park City, Utah, 22 September 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    “Big Issues: Consumer Choice: Can It Cure The Nation’s Health-Care Ills?” Wall Street Journal, December 13, 2005Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    http://healthtransformation.net/news/cht_articles_and_op_eds/4375.cfmGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114850936291862362.htmlGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Burgelman, Dr. R. Pearl, MD and P.E. Meza, “Better Medicine Through Information Technology”, Standford Graduate Schol of Business, October 24, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin J. D’Cruz
    • 1
  • Ranjan B. Kini
    • 2
  1. 1.Turku School of EconomicsTurkuFinland
  2. 2.School of BusinessIndiana University NorthwestGaryUS

Personalised recommendations