Advertisement

SATSIX Mobility Architecture and Its Performance Evaluation

  • I. Melhus
  • F. Arnal
  • T. Gayraud
  • B. Jacquemin

As wireless and satellite networks become widely used, new ways to think communication can be envisaged. In particular, a greater degree of connectivity is almost becoming a necessity for the users on the go, being connected whatever their locations are. Different definitions of mobility are emerging, and in SATSIX three mobility scenarios are defined, namely discrete mobility, continuous mobility and seamless mobility. Next, two mobility contexts; macro-mobility and micromobility, according to network hierarchy have been considered. To improve the mobility management, and reducing signaling overhead and handover delay when using MIPv6, the enhancement protocols HMIPV6, FMIPv6 and the combination FHMIPv6 are investigated. Application mobility is analyzed as a complement to network layer mobility. The project also addresses the impacts on several others key networking functions like multicast, QoS and PEP.

Keywords

Mobile Node Session Initiation Protocol Home Agent Correspondent Node Mobile IPv6 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Johnson, C. Perkins, J. Arkko, “Mobility Support in Ipv6”, IETF RFC 3775, June 2004.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Soliman, C. Castelluccia, K. El Malki “Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6)”, IETF RFC 4140 (Experimental), August 2005.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. McCann, “Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 802.11 Networks”, IETF RFC 4068 (Informative), November 2005.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Rosenberg “SIP Session Initiation Protocol”, IETF RFC 3261, June 2002.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. C. Schmidt, M. Waehlisch “Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem Statement”, IETF, draft-schmidt-mobopts-mcastv6-ps-02.txt, March 2007.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Chaskar, “Requirements of a Quality of Service (QoS) Solution for Mobile IP”, IETF RFC 3583 (Informative), September 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Melhus
    • 1
  • F. Arnal
    • 2
  • T. Gayraud
    • 3
  • B. Jacquemin
    • 4
  1. 1.SINTEF ICT — Communication SystemsNorway
  2. 2.Thales Alenia SpaceToulouse Cedex 1France
  3. 3.CNRS/LAASToulouse University of ScienceToulouse Cedex 4France
  4. 4.CNRS/LAASToulouse University of ScienceFrance

Personalised recommendations