Skip to main content

Overlapping Tasks Methodology as a Tool for Investigating Language Perception

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 1))

A series of studies is reviewed that investigated the effects of additional tasks on the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) within the framework of an overlapping tasks paradigm. In all studies the N400 component was elicited by words that could be either synonymous or nonsynonymous to a preceding word and by subtracting the ERP to synonymous from those to non-synonymous words. Additional task stimuli were visual and could be presented at high to low temporal overlap with the words. The N400 was delayed in time when there was high temporal overlap with the additional task stimulus. The delay was more pronounced when the additional task was more difficult and more language-like. Second-language speakers showed very similar interference effects albeit at a globally slower level. Somewhat different interference effects were obtained when the meaning of the eliciting words were irrelevant to the task. In contrast, eye movements and visuo-spatial attention shifts had no effects on N400 latency. Together, the results indicate that the N400-eliciting processes — presumably the access to semantic knowledge — belong to a group of central processes that form a bottleneck in the cognitive system because they can handle only one process at a time. On the basis of these findings dual-task methodology is suggested to be a valuable tool not only for investigating the processes supporting language perception and, more generally, the retrieval of semantic knowledge but also for other language perception processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, P. A., Lien, M. C., Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Judge, K. S., & McCann, R. S. (2002). Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 17, 505-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, A. A., Gaskell, M. G., Quinlan, P. T., & Tamminen, J. (2006). Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from dual-task methodologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 32, 104-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, S. (1994), Fatal Words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, R. (2002). Psycholinguistik. 1. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimigen, O., Schild, U., Hohlfeld, A., Berg, P. & Sommer, W. (submitted). Auditory language comprehension during saccadic eye movements: An investigation with event-related brain potentials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, 1187-1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. (2005). Parallel memory retrieval in dual task situations? Unpublished Dissertation. Berlin: Humboldt-University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D. (1986), Energetics and Resources. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles, (Eds.), Adaptation to stress and task demands. NATO Advanced Research Workshop, New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 193-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1991). Motor Constraints in Dual-Task Performance. In D. L. Damos, (Ed), Multiple-Task Performance (pp. 173-204). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Caharack, G., & Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alternation or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 109, 98-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, A., Fukuda, R., Neuper, S., Sangals, J., Sommer, W., & Straeter, O. (2004c). Task load effects on language processing: experimental approaches. In R. Dietrich & T. M. Childress (Eds.), Group interaction in high risk environments (pp. 209-240). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, A., Martín-Loeches, M., & Sommer, W. (in preparation). Semantic and syntactic processing in Spanish sentences and additional task load.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, A., Mierke, K. & Sommer, W. (2004a). Is word perception in a second-language more vulnerable than in one’s native language? Evidence from brain potentials in a dual task setting. Brain & Language, 89, 569-579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, A., Sangals, J., & Sommer, W. (2004b). Effects of additional tasks on language perception: An ERP investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1012-1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, A., & Sommer, W. (2005). Semantic Processing of Unattended Meaning is Modulated by Additional Task Load: Evidence from Electrophysiology. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 500-512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäncke, L. (1994). Horizontal pursuit right-arm movements and dual-tasks interferences: A replication and extension, Cortex, 30, 695-700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973), Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II. In M. A. Gernsbacher & M. Traxler (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, M. C., Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Grabbe, J., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (2006). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater auto-maticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 21, 431-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 26, 1072-1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (1998). Sources of dual-task interference - Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Science, 9, 223-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Loeches, M., Nigbur, R., Casado, P., Hohlfeld, A., & Sommer, W. (2006). Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish. Brain Research, 1093, 178-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., Remington, R. W., & Van Selst, M. (2000). A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1352-1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703-704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979), On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Reveiw, 86, 214-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. A. and Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H. J., Nicol, J., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A. & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L. & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabovsky, M., Alvarez, C., Hohlfeld, A., & Sommer, W., (in preparation). Effects of an additional task on visual word recognition: An ERP study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1303-1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösler, F., Streb, J., & Haan, H. (2001). Event-related brain potentials evoked by verbs and nouns in a primed lexical decision task. Psychophysiology, 38, 694-703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D., & Coles, M. G. H. (1995). Electrophysiology of mind. Event-related potentials and cognition. -220. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangals, J., Ross, L., & Sommer, W. (2004). Time pressure effects on information processing in overlapping tasks: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Acta Psychologica, 117, 275-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangals, J., Wilwer, M., & Sommer, W. (in press). Localising practice effects in dual-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J. & Kieras, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a Stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 105-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, W., Leuthold, H. & Schubert, T. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 81-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1952). The “Psychological refractory period” and the timing of high speed performance - A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, H. (2004). Semantics as a gateway to language. In H. Härtl & H. Tappe (Eds.), Mediating between concepts and language (Trends in linguistics 152, pp. 197-222). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A. (2008). Overlapping Tasks Methodology as a Tool for Investigating Language Perception. In: Breznitz, Z. (eds) Brain Research in Language. Literacy Studies, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74980-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74980-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74979-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74980-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics