Skip to main content

Image Enlargement Based on Low- to High-frequency Components Mapping Derived from Self-decomposed Images

  • Chapter
  • 971 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 4))

Due to the wide diffusion of multimedia applications and wide area screens-for example, video walls—the problem of image size conversion (especially image enlargement) has significantly increased in importance. Various image enlargement methods have been proposed so far [1], and they are split into multi-frame image enlargement methods and single-frame methods.

The multi-frame image enlargement is a process of combining multiple frames of low-resolution images in the same scene for the reconstruction of a single highresolution image. Many multi-frame image enlargement methods have been proposed up to now. For example, there are the frequency domain methods [2–4], the projection onto convex sets (POCS) methods [5, 6], and the maximum a posteriori (MAP) methods [7–9]. They can obtain good enlargement performance with respect to image quality. However, their computational complexity and storage consumption are tremendous. It is, therefore, very difficult to realize real-time processing by them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Ouwerkerk JD (2006) Image super-resolution survey. Image and Vision Computing (24):1039–1052

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsai RY and Huang TS (1984) Multiframe image restoration and registration. Advances in Computer Vision and Image Processing (1):317–339

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaltenbacher E and Hardie RC (1996) High-resolution infrared image reconstruction using multiple low resolution aliased frames In Proceedings of IEEE National Aerospace Electronics Conference, New York, pp. 702–709

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim SP, Bose NK, and Valenzuela HM (1990) Recursive reconstruction of high resolution image from noisy undersampled multiframes. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (38):1013–1027

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oskoui-Fard P and Strak H (1998) Tomographic image reconstruction using the theory of convex projections. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging (7):45–58

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patti AJ and Altunbasak Y (2001) Artifact reduction for set theoretic super resolution image reconstruction with edge adaptive constraints and higher-order interpolation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (10):179–180

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schultz RR and Stevenson RL (1996) Extraction of high-resolution frames from video sequences. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (5):996–1011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hardie RC, Barnard KJ, and Armstrong EE (1997) Joint MAP registration and high-resolution image estimation using a sequence of under-sampled images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (6):1621–1633

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen N, Milanfar P, and Golub G (2001) A computationally efficient super resolution image reconstruction algorithm. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (10):573–583

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin JS (1990) Two-dimensional signal processing and image processing. (Prentice-Hall, London, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keys RG (1981) Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (29):1153–1160

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen K and Anastassiou D (1995) Subpixel edge localization and the interpolation still images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (4):285–295

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li X and Orchard MT (2001) New edge-directed interpolation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (10):1521–1527

    Google Scholar 

  14. Darwish AM and Bedair MS (1996) An adaptive resampling algorithm for image zooming. Proc. SPIE (2466):131–144

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martucci SA (1995) Image resizing in the discrete cosine transform domain. In Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York) pp. 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang SG, Cvetkovic Z, and Vetterli M (1995) Resolution enhancement of images using wavelet transform extrema extrapolation. In Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York) pp. 2379–2382.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenspan H, Anderson CH, and Akber S (2000) Image enhancement by nonlinear extrapolation in frequency space. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (9):1035–1048

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aso T, Suetake N, and Yamakawa T (2006) A weighted linear extrapolation-based simple image enlargement algorithm. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing V12(N3):345–353

    Google Scholar 

  19. Candonica FM and Principe JC (1999) Superresolution of images based on local correlations. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. (10):372–380

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plaziac N (1999) Image interpolation using neural networks. IEEE Trans. Image Process. (8):1647–1651

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pan F and Zhang L (2003) New image super-resolution scheme based on residual error restoration by neural networks. Opt. Eng. (42):3038–3046

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suykens JAK, Van Gestel T, De Brabanter J, De Moor B, and Vandewalle J (2002) Least Squares Support Vector Machines. World Scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Vapnik VN (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Schölkopf B, Herbrich R, and Smola AJ (2001) A generalized representer theorem. Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory and 5th European Conference on Computational Learning Theory pp. 416–426

    Google Scholar 

  25. Golub GH and Van Loan CF (1989) Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Espinoza M, Suykens JAK, and Moor BD (2006) Fixed-size least squares support vector machines: a large scale application in electrical load forecasting. Journal of Computational Management Science 3(2):113–129

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kawano, H., Suetake, N., Cha, B., Aso, T. (2008). Image Enlargement Based on Low- to High-frequency Components Mapping Derived from Self-decomposed Images. In: Huang, X., Chen, YS., Ao, SI. (eds) Advances in Communication Systems and Electrical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74938-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74938-9_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74937-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74938-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics