Advertisement

The Categorical Distinction Annexations to Maximal Associations Discovered from Web Database by Rough Set Theory to Increase the Quality

  • Erkan Ülker
  • Eyüp Siramkaya
  • Ahmet Arslan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 4)

Most of the sectors transferred their information to the internet environment once the technology used became widespread and cheap. Print media organizations, which have a vital role in informing public opinion, and the data that are the services of these organizations are also shared over internet media. The fact that the continuously increasing amount of data includes the rich data it causes interesting and important data to be overlooked. Having large numbers of responses returned from queries about a specific event, person or place brings query owners face to face with unwanted or unrelated query results. Therefore, it is necessary to access textual data in press-publication sources that are reachable over internet in a fast and effective way and to introduce studies about producing meaningful and important information from these resources.

Keywords

Association Rule Association Rule Mining Information Table Apriori Algorithm Minimum Support Threshold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami A (1993) Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases. In: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD Conf. on Management of Data. Washington, D.C., United States, pp. 207–216Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal R, Srikant R (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proc. 20th Very Large Databases Conference in Santiego Chile, pp. 487–499Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bi Y, Anderson T, McClean S (2003) A rough set model with ontologies for discovering maximal association rules in document collections. J Knowledge-Based Systems 16:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen WC, Tseng SS, Wang CY (2005) A novel manufacturing defect detection method using association rule mining techniques. J Expert Systems with Applications 29:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clare A, Williams HE, Lester N (2004) Scalable multi-relational association mining. In: Proc. of the Fourth IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining (ICDM’04). Brighton, UK, pp. 355–358Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coenen F, Leng P, Ahmed S (2004) Data structure for association rule mining: t-trees and p-trees. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(6):774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Do TD, Hui SC, Fong AC (2005) Mining class association rules with artificial immune system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3684:94–100Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doddi S, Marathe A, Ravi SS, Torney DC (2001) Discovery of association rules in medical data. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 26:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feldman R, Aumann Y, Amir A, Zilberstein A, Kloesgen W (1997) Maximal association rules: a new tool for mining for keywords cooccurrences in document collections. In: Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery (KDD’1997). Newport Beach, CA, pp. 167–170Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feldman R, Fresko M, Kinar Y, Lindell Y, Liphostat O, Rajman M, Schler Y, Zamir O (1998) Text mining at the term level. In: Proc. of the 2nd European Symposium on Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1510:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guan JW, Bell DA, Liu DY (2003) The rough set approach to Association Rule Mining. In: Proc. of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’03). Melbourne, Florida, USA, pp. 529–532Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo JY (2003) Rough set-based approach to data mining. Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han J, Kamber M (2001) Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hong TP, Lin KY, Wang SL (2003) Fuzzy data mining for interesting generalized association rules. J Fuzzy Sets and Systems 138:255–269CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang Z, Hu YQ (2003) Applying AI technology and Rough Set Theory to mine association rules for supporting knowledge management. In: Proc. Of Second Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 3:1820–1825Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu XG, Wang DX, Liu XP, Guo J, Wang H (2004) The analysis on model of association rules mining based on concept lattice and apriori algorithm. In: Proc. of the Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics in Shangai, pp. 1620–1624Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iváncsy R, Juhász S, Kovács F (2004) Performance prediction for association rule mining algorithms. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics, Vienna, Austria, pp. 265–271Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ivkovic S, Yearwood J, Stranieri A (2002) Discovering interesting association rules from legal databases. Information and Communications Technology Law 11:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Le SC, Huang MJ (2002) Applying AI technology and rough set theory for mining association rules to support crime management and fire-fighting resources allocation. J Information, Technology and Society. 2002(2):65–78Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee HS (2005) Incremental association mining based on maximal itemsets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3681:365–371Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li C, Yang M (2004) Association rules data mining in manufacturing information System based on Genetic Algorithms. In: Third Int. Conf. On Computational Electromagnetics and Its Applications Proceedings. Beijing, China, pp. 153–156Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu XW, He PL (2004) The research of improved association rules mining apriori algorithm. In: Proc. of the Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics in Shangai, pp. 1577–1579Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loo KK, Lap YC, Kao B, Cheung D (2000) Exploiting the duality of maximal frequent itemsets and minimal infrequent itemsets for i/o efficient association rule mining. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1873:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ma X, Ma J (2004) Rough set model for discovering single-dimensional and multidimensional association rules. IEEE International conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 4:3531–3536Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. International J Cooperative Information Systems 1:335–376Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998) Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery Part I. Physica-Verlag, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saggar M, Agrawal AK, Lad A (2004) Optimization of association rule mining using improved genetic algorithms. IEEE Int. Conf. On Systems, Man and Cybernetics 4:3725–3729Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sartipi K, Kontogiannis K (2001) Component clustering based on maximal association. In: Proc. Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE’01). Suttgart, Germany, pp. 103–114Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Satoh K, Uno T (2003) Enumerating maximal frequent sets using irredundant dualization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2843:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Techapichetvanich K, Datta A (2004) Visual mining of market basket association rules. Lecture Notes In Computer Science 3046:479–488Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ülker E, Sıramkaya E, çomak E, Uğuz H, Arslan A (2005) Finding Regular Association Rules by applying the apriori algorithm. In: Proc. Of 4th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS). Konya, Turkey, pp. 59–62Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vincenti G, Hammell RJ, Trajkovski G (2005) Data mining for imprecise temporal associations. In: Proc. Of sixth Int. Conf. On Software Engineering, AI, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD/SAWN’05). Maryland, USA, pp. 76–81Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang QD, Wang XJ, Wang XP (2002) Variable precision rough set model based dataset partition and association rule mining. In: Proc. Of First Int. Conf. On Machine learning and Cybernetics. Beijing, China, pp. 2175–2179Google Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Yan X, Zhang C, Zhang S (2005) ARMGA: Identifying interesting association rules with genetic algorithms. J Applied Artificial Intelligence 19:677–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang S, Lu J, Zhang C (2004) A fuzzy logic based method to acquire user threshold of minimum-support for mining association rules. J Information Sciences 164:1–16MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkan Ülker
    • 1
  • Eyüp Siramkaya
    • 1
  • Ahmet Arslan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringSelcuk UniversityTurkey

Personalised recommendations