Advertisement

Web OpinionPoll: Extensive Collection and Impression-based Visualization of People’s Opinions

  • Tadahiko Kumamoto
  • Katsumi Tanaka
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 4)

The World Wide Web is remarkably developing as a simple and inexpensive means for sending information, and various people have been expressing their opinions from different standpoints on the Web. Consequently, the Web is rapidly becoming a treasure house of public opinion about any and all topics. In recent years, studies of extracting other people’s opinions from the Web have been started [3–5]. They have proposed a system that collects other people’s opinions about a user-specified event or thing from the Web, evaluates the opinions on several evaluation axes, and shows the results using a radar chart. However, their system cannot show a general view of the overall opinion because the system averages the opinions and forms a conclusion. We, therefore, propose a novel Web-based question answering system named Web OpinionPoll that collects other people’s opinions about a user-given concern from the Web, and presents a general view of the opinions in a visual way. This system helps users intuitively understand answers to questions that request others’ opinions.

Keywords

Target Word Query Expansion Retrieval Result Character String Impression Plane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Radev D, Fan W, Qi H, Wu H, Grewal A (2002) Probabilistic question answering on the web. In: Proceedings of WWW’02, Honolulu, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tellex S, Katz B, Lin J, Fernandes A, Marton G (2003) Quantitative evaluation of passage retrieval algorithms for question answering. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR’03, Toronto, 41–47Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tateishi K, Ishiguro Y, Fukushima T (2002) Opinion information retrieval from the Internet. IPSJ SIG Technical Report, 2001-NL-144:75–82Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morinaga S, Yamanishi K, Tateishi K, Fukushima T (2002) Mining product reputations on the web. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD’02, Edmonton, 341–349Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tateishi K, Fukushima T, Kobayashi N, Takahashi T, Fujita A, Inui K, Matsumoto Y (2004) Web opinion extraction and summarization based on viewpoints of products. IPSJ SIG Technical Report, 2004-NL-163:1–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turney P D (2002) Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of ACL’02, Philadelphia, 417–424Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dave K, Lawrence S, Pennock D M (2003) Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of WWW’03, Budapest, 519–528Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yi J, Nasukawa T, Bunescu R, Niblack W (2003) Sentiment analyzer: extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int Conf Data Mining, Florida, 427–434Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plutchik R (1962) The emotions: facts, theories, and a New Model. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nihon Keizai Shimbun Inc. Nikkei newspaper full text database DVD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumamoto T, Tanaka K (2005) Proposal of impression mining from news articles. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI3681:901–910, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurohashi S, Kawahara D (2003) Manual for Japanese morphological analysis system juman version 4.0Google Scholar
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadahiko Kumamoto
    • 1
  • Katsumi Tanaka
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information and Computer ScienceChiba Institute of TechnologyJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of InformaticsKyoto UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations