Advertisement

Our intention in creating the HSAA was to bring together in a single collection current articles describing the people and cultures of the aboriginal South American past. There were many reasons for having undertaken such a project, but certainly our primary motivations involved the fact that as archaeological area studies increase, the practitioners and their discourses become more knowledgeable and specialized, and also more involuted, with fewer and fewer relationships among scholars in neighboring places. Eventually, continental issues and common goals recede into the background, replaced by concerns as well as knowledge defined in local, regional and national theaters. With few exceptions archaeologists are no longer South Americanists, but Amazonianists, Caribbeanists, Central Andeanists, etc. Many pre-historians, and especially the residents of modern South American nations, have become even more spatially specialized, bounded by the arbitrary frontiers of modern states – the archaeology of Peru, or Argentina, or Colombia, etc. Of course, modern national boundaries have nothing to do with prehistoric cultures and their spheres of interaction, but they have everything to do with the current practice of archaeology, from institutional control of archaeological patrimony to professional training and circles of colleagues, to journals, associations, and languages of communication. Furthermore, more and more contemporary archaeology is linked to identity, that is, almost always, presently defined as national identity, or regional or community identity. Rarely does the framework involve a more international Native American identity, or global humanist identity. Surely, our new century will see this change, as enlightenment ideology of national sovereignty is eclipsed by international organizations such as the Mercosur in the South American southern cone and the European Union, to say nothing of postmodern globalism. In the meantime, we need grander, continental perspectives on the past. Necessarily, the HSAA expresses the area foci of our era, but it seeks to promote knowledge of a whole, stimulating dialogue and collaboration among the diverse assemblage of pre-historians and other readers interested in the South American continent.

By bringing together this set of integrative summaries and analytical discussions – some from traditional, but many from less conventional perspectives – we hope to encourage a more inclusive intellectual gaze, embracing the continent, among South American archaeologists as well as the broader community of scholars, students, and lay readers who enjoy archaeological knowledge. Beyond the increased depth of knowledge area specialists acquire when they refine their understandings of neighboring cultures, the teaching of South American archaeology may benefit from more continental perspectives, as well as the new instructional resource that the HSAA represents for comparative scholarship, presenting current statements as well as extensive bibliographies that should promote cultural comparisons and generalization, both among the prehistoric cultures of South America and between South American and other societies of the ancient world.

Keywords

Archaeological Record Historical Ecology Prehistoric Culture Amazonian Dark Earth Andean Civilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balée, William (ed.), 1998, Advances in Historical Ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Balée, William and Clark Erickson (eds.), 2006, Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Wendell C., 1946, The Central Andes. In Handbook of South American Indians, Volume 2, The Andean Civilizations, edited by Julian H. Steward, pp. 61–147. Bulletin 143. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Blanton, Richard. E., Gary M. Feinman, Stephen A. Kowalewski, and Peter N. Peregrine, 1996, A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Childe, V. Gordon, 1936, Man Makes Himself. Watts, London.Google Scholar
  6. Childe, V. Gordon, 1942, What Happened in History. Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Crumley, Carole L. (ed.), 1994, Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  8. Denevan, William M., 1966, The Aboriginal Cultural Geography of the Llanos de Mojos of Bolivia. Ibero Americana, No. 48. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Denevan, William M., 1992, The Pristine Myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82: 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillehay, Tom D., 2000, The Settlement of the Americas. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Feinman, Gary M., 2001, Mesoamerican political complexity: the corporate-network dimension. In From Leaders to Rulers, edited by Jonathan Haas, pp. 151–176. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Fladmark, Knut R., Jonathan C. Driver, and Diana Alexander, 1988, The Paleoindian component at Charlie Lake Cave, British Columbia. American Antiquity 53: 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flannery, Kent V. (ed.), 1976, The Early Mesoamerican Village. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Flannery, Kent V., 2002, Prehistoric social evolution. In Archaeology: Original Readings in Method and Practice, edited by Peter N. Peregrine, Carol R. Ember, and Melvin Ember, pp. 225–244. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  15. Fried, Morton H., 1967, The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Haas, Jonathan and Winifred Creamer, 2004, Cultural transformations in the Central Andean Late Archaic. In Andean Archaeology, edited by Helaine Silverman, pp. 35–51. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Haas, Jonathan and Winifred Creamer, 2006, Crucible of Andean Civilization. Current Anthropology 47: 745–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosler, Dorothy and Andrew Macfarlane, 1996, Copper sources, metal production, and metals trade in Late Postclassic Mesoamerica. Science 273: 1819–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larco Hoyle, Rafael, 1939, Los Cupisniques. La Crónica y Veiedades, Lima.Google Scholar
  20. Lathrap, Donald W., 1970, The Upper Amazon. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Lubow, Arthur, 2007, The possessed: should Yale University return its relics of Machu Picchu? And who in Peru would actually benefit if it does? The New York Times Magazine, 24 June 2007, Section 6: 42–49, 68, 82–83.Google Scholar
  22. Marcos, Jorge G., 1995, El Mullo y el Pututo: la articulacion de la ideologia y el tráfico a larga distancia en la formación del estado Huancavilca. In Primer Encuentro de Investigadores de la Costa Ecuatoriana en Europa, edited by Silvia G. Alvarez, Aurelio Alvarez, Carmen Fauria, and Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 97–142. Abya-Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  23. Meggers, Betty J., 1957, Environment and culture in the Amazon Basin: an appraisal of the theory of environmental limitations. In Studies in Human Ecology, Social Science Monograph, Vol. 3, edited by Angel Palerm, pp. 71–89. The Pan American Union, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Meggers, Betty J., 1971, Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Meggers, Betty J. and Clifford Evans, 1961, An experimental formulation of horizon styles in the tropical forest area of South America. In Essays in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology, edited by Samuel K. Lothrop et al., pp. 372–388. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Neves, Walter, Rolando Gonzalez-Jose, Mark Hubbes, Renato Kipnis, Astolfo Araujo, and Oldemar Blasi, 2005, Early Holocene human skeletal remains from Cerca Grande, Lagoa Santa, Central Brazil, and the origins of the first Americans. World Archaeology 36: 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Posnansky, Arthur, 1914, Una Metrópoli Prehistórica en America del Sur. Eine Praehistorische Metropole in Südamerika. Dietrich Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  28. Pozorski, Shelia, and Thomas Pozorski, 1992, Early civilization in the Casma Valley, Peru. Antiquity 66: 845–870.Google Scholar
  29. Pozorski, Shelia, and Thomas Pozorski and Thomas Pozorski, 1994, Early Andean cities. Scientific American 270 (6): 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Redman, Charles, 1978, The Rise of Civilization: From Early Farmers to Urban Society in the Ancient Near East. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  31. Roosevelt, Anna C., John Douglas, and Linda Brown, 2002, The migrations and adaptations of the first Americans: Clovis and Pre-Clovis viewed from South America. In The First Americans, edited by Nina G. Jablonski, pp. 159–236. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, No. 27, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  32. Roosevelt, Anna C., John Douglas, Linda Brown, R. A. Housley, M. Imazio da Silveira, S. Maranca, and R. Johnson, 1991, Eighth millennium pottery from a prehistoric shell midden in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 254: 1621–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roosevelt, Anna C., John Douglas, Linda Brown, M. Llima da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M. Michab, N. Mercier, H. Valladas, J. Feathers, W. Barnett, M. Imazio da Silveira, A. Henderson, J. Silva, B. Chernoff, D. S. Reese, J. A. Holman, N. Toth, and K. Schick, 1996, Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: the peopling of the Americas. Science 272: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sahlins, Marshall and Elman R. Service (eds.), 1960, Evolution and Culture. Univeristy of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  35. Sauer, Carl O., 1952, Agricultural Origins and Dispersals. American Geographical Society, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Schurr, Theodore G., 2004a, Molecular genetic diversity in Siberians and Native Americans suggests an early colonization of the New World. In Entering America, edited by David B. Madsen, pp. 187–238. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  37. Schurr, Theodore G., 2004b, The peopling of the New World: perspectives from molecular anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, pp. 551–583. Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  38. Service, Elman R., 1962, Primitive Social Organization: An Evolutionary Perspective. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Service, Elman R., 1971, Cultural Evolutionism: Theory in Practice. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Shady Solis, Ruth, 1999, Los orígines de la civilización y la formacion del estado en el Perú: las evidencias arqueológicas de Caral - Supe (primera parte). Boletín Museo de Arqueología y Antropologia, Centro Cultral de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 2: 2–4.Google Scholar
  41. Shady Solis, Ruth, 2003, Caral, Supe: La Civilización Más Antigua de América. Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Lima.Google Scholar
  42. Shady Solis, Ruth, 2004, Caral: La Ciudad del Fuego Sagrado/The City of the Sacred Fire. Centurs Sab, Lima.Google Scholar
  43. Shady Solis, Ruth, 2005, Caral-Supe-Perú. In La Civilización de Caral-Supe: 5000 Años de Identidad Cultural en el Perú. Instituto Nacional de Cultura/Proyecto Especial Arqueológico Caral-Supe, Lima.Google Scholar
  44. Shady Solis, Ruth, 2006, America’s first city? The case of Late Archaic Caral. In Andean Archaeology III: North and South, edited by William H. Isbell and Helaine Silverman, pp. 28–66. Kluwer Academic Publishing Co., New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sokolowski, Robert, 2000, Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
  46. Stahl, Peter W., 2002, Paradigms in paradise: revising standard Amazonian prehistory. Review of Anthropology 23: 39–50.Google Scholar
  47. Stahl, Peter W. (ed.), 1995, Archaeology in the Lowland American Tropics: Current Analytical Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Stanish, Charles and Kevin J. Haley, 2005, Power, fairness, and architecture: modelling early chiefdom development in the Central Andes. In Foundations of Power in the Prehispanic Andes, edited by Kevin J. Vaughn, Dennis Ogburn, and Christine A. Conlee, pp. 53–70. Anthropological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Number 14, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  49. Tello, Julio C., 1943, Discovery of the Chavin culture in Peru. American Antiquity 1: 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tello, Julio C., 1960, Chavín: Cultura Matriz de la Civilización Andina. Publicación Antropológica del Archivo “Julio C. Tello” de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
  51. Trigger, Bruce G., 2003, Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Young-Sánchez, Margaret, 2004, Tapestry Tunic. In Tiwanaku: Ancestors of the Inca (with essays by Sergio J. Chávez, Nicole C. Couture, Paul S. Goldstein, Alan Kolata, Mario A Rivera), edited by Margaret Young-Sánchez, pp. 46–49. Denver Art Museum and University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Isbell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyState University of New York BinghamtonBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations