Inter-zonal Relationships in Ecuador

  • Francisco Valdez

The discussion of inter-zonal relationships must necessarily begin by stating what is to be understood by the concept of relationship in a culture history archaeological sense. In simple terms I will refer to relationship as the interaction—direct or indirect—between two or more individuals (groups or communities) living in close proximity or far apart. Interactions are, in turn, defined as the consequence of human encounter, through physical or ideological contact, in which there is a social exchange of ideas, goods, or information that can be said to be sought by the involved individuals as an agency to supplement or complement their material or symbolic life ways. Social interactions are a very important part of past and present lifeways. They take many forms and can be expressed in a variety of ways that are not always archaeologically evident, as they may or may not leave material traces. Unfortunately, unless there is a way to substantiate such interactions, one cannot establish or infer such relationships.

In general, the presence of exotic goods (raw or processed materials) can be considered evidence of past relationships. The same can be said of technological traditions, ceramic objects, or any other items that can be defined as pertaining to a given cultural affiliation different from that ascribed to the archaeological contexts in which they were found. The nature of these relationships is often difficult to establish, nonetheless, the connection between separate groups can be recognized and its causes and consequences hypothesized.


Formative Period American Antiquity Polished Stone Marine Shell Southern Highland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arellano, Jorge, 1994, Loma Pucara, a Formative site in the Cebadas Valley, Ecuador. National Geographic Research and Exploration 10 (1): 118–120.Google Scholar
  2. Arellano, Jorge, 2000, Primeras evidencias del Formativo Tardío en la sierra central del Ecuador. In Formativo Sudamericano, edited by Paulina Ledergerber-Crespo, pp. 160–175. Abya-Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  3. Athens, J. Stephen, 1995, Relaciones interregionales prehistóricas en el norte de los Andes: evidencias del sitio La Chimba, en el Ecuador septentrional. In Perspectivas Regionales en la Arqueología del Surroccidente de Colombia y Norte de Ecuador, edited by Cristóbal Gnecco, pp. 3–29. Ediciones de la Universidad del Cauca, Popayán.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, Robert, 1974, Investigation of the Inga Complex and Preceramic Occupations of Highland Ecuador. Final report to the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Braun, Robert, 1982, Cerro Narrío reanalyzed: the Formative as seen from the Ecuadorian highlands. In Primer Simposio de Correlaciones Antropológicas Andino-Mesoamericanas, edited by Jorge G. Marcos and Presley Norton, pp. 41–99. Espol, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, Tamara L., 1995, The Panzaleo puzzle: non-local pottery in northern highland Ecuador. Journal of Field Archaeology 22 (2): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruhns, Karen Olsen, 2003, Social and cultural development in the Ecuadorian highlands and eastern lowlands during the Formative. In Archaeology of Formative Ecuador, edited by J. Scott Raymond and Richard L. Burger, pp. 125–174. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Burger, Richard L., 1992, Chavin and the Origins of Andean Civilization. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
  9. Burger, Richard L., 2003, Conclusions: cultures of the Ecuadorian Formative in their Andean context. In Archaeology of Formative Ecuador, edited by J. Scott Raymond and Richard L. Burger, pp. 465–486. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Burger, Richard L., Frank Asaro, Ernesto Salazar, Helen Michel, and Fred Stross, 1994, An initial consideration of obsidian procurement and exchange in pre-Hispanic Ecuador. Latin American Antiquity 5 (3): 228–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caldwell, Joseph R., 1964, Interaction spheres in prehistory. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Joseph R. Cadwell and R. L. May, pp. 133–143. Illinois State Museum, Scientific Papers, No. 12. Springfield.Google Scholar
  12. Crespo Toral, Hernán and José María Vargas (eds.), 1977, Historia del Arte Ecuatoriano, Tomo 1. Salvat Editores Ecuatoriana, Quito.Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, Tom, 2003, Nature as culture’s representation: a change of focus in Late Formative iconography. In Archaeology of Formative Ecuador, edited by J. Scott Raymond and Richard L. Burger, pp. 423–464. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Echeverría, José, 2004, Las Sociedades Prehispánicas de la Sierra Norte. Una Aproximación Arqueológica y Antropológica, Serie I, Perspectiva Histórica, Vol. 1. Universidad de Otavalo- Instituto Otavaleño de Antropología, Otavalo.Google Scholar
  15. Edmund, George A., 1965, A Late Pleistocene fauna from the Santa Elena Peninsula, Ecuador. Life Sciences Contributions 63: 21. Royal Ontario Museum.Google Scholar
  16. Guffroy, Jean, Napoleón Almeida, Patrice Lecoq, Chantal Caillavet, Francis Duverneuil, Laure Emperaire, and Bernadette Arnaud, 1987, Loja Prehispanique. Editions Recherche sur les Civillisations, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Guinea, Mercedes, 1998, La metalurgia del cobre en la costa norte del Ecuador durante el periodo de integración. In El Area Septentrional Andina. Arqueología y Etnohistoria, edited by Mercedes Guinea, pp. 83–110. Biblioteca Abya Yala, 59. IFEA-Abya Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  18. Helms, Mary, 1979, Ancient Panama. Chiefs in Search of Power. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Holm, Olaf, 1966/67, Money axes from Ecuador. Folk 8–9: 136–143.Google Scholar
  20. Holm, Olaf, 1978, Hachas monedas del Ecuador. In Actas y Trabajos del Tercer Congreso Peruano: El Hombre y la Cultura Andina, edited by Ramiro Matos, pp. 347–361. Lima.Google Scholar
  21. Holm, Olaf, and Hernán Crespo T., 1980, Las culturas formativas. In Historia del Ecuador, 1:87–191. Salvat Editores, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  22. Issacson, John, 1994, Volcanic sediments in archaeological contexts from western Ecuador. In Regional Archaeology in Northern Manabi, Ecuador, Vol.1. Environment, Cultural Chronology, and the Prehistoric Subsistence in the Jama River Valley, edited by James A. Zeidler and Deborah M. Pearsall, pp. 131–140. Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology, 8. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Jijón y Caamaño, Jacinto, 1949, Un vaso Thin Orange del país Caranqui, Ecuador. American Antiquity 14 (3): 226–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jijón y Caamaño, Jacinto 1997 [1951], Antropología Prehispánica del Ecuador. Reprinted edition. Museo Jacinto Jijón y Caamaño, Quito.Google Scholar
  25. Lathrap, Donald W., 1970, The Upper Amazon. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, Julie, 1979, Mochica works of art in metal: a review. In Pre-Columbian Metallurgy of South America, edited by Elisabeth P. Benson, pp. 53–104. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Lippi, Ronald, 2004, Tropical Forest Archaeology in Western Pichincha, Ecuador. Thomson/Wadsworth Case Studies in Archaeology, Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Lippi, Ronald, 1988, Paleotopography and phosphate analysis of a buried jungle site in Ecuador. Journal of Field Archaeology 15: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch, Thomas and Susan Pollock, 1981, La arqueología de la Cueva Negra de Chobshi, Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 1: 92–119. Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
  30. Marcos, Jorge G., 1978, The Ceremonial Precinct at Real Alto: Organization of Time and Space in Valdivia Society. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  31. Marcos, Jorge G., 1995a, El manejo del agua en el variado medio ambiente del área septentrional andina a partir del tercer milenio AC. In Cultura y Medio Ambiente en el Area Andina Septentrional, edited by Mercedes Guinea, Jean François Bouchard, and Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 129–164. Biblioteca Abya Yala, 2. Abya Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  32. Marcos, Jorge G., 1995b, El mullo y el pututo: la articulación de la ideología y el tráfico a larga distancia en la formación del estado Huancavilca. In Primer Encuentro de Investigadores de la Costa Ecuatoriana en Europa. Arqueología-Etnohistoriá, Antropología Sociocultural, edited by A. Alvarez, Silvia Alvarez, Carmen Fauría and Jorge G. Marcos, pp. 97–142. Ediciones Abya Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer-Oakes, William J., 1986, El Inga, a Paleo-Indian site in the Sierra of Northern Ecuador. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 76: 1–235.Google Scholar
  34. Meggers, Betty, Clifford Evans and Emilio Estrada, 1965, Early Formative Period in Coastal Ecuador: The Valdivia and Machalilla Phases, Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, 1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  35. Murra, John V., 1975, El tráfico de mullu en la costa del Pácifico. In Formaciones Económicas y Políticas del Mundo Andino, by John V. Murra, pp. 255–267. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima.Google Scholar
  36. Paulsen, Allison, 1974, The Thorny Oyster and the Voice of God. Spondylus and Stombus in Andean prehistory. American Antiquity 39 (4): 597–607.Google Scholar
  37. Peterson, Emil, 1984, Morteros ceremoniales: the early development and distribution of a decorated stone bowl tradition in north-west South America. In Social and Economic Organization in the Prehispanic Andes, edited by David L. Browman, Richard L. Burger, and Mario A. Rivera, pp. 21–31. BAR International Series, 194. Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Ponce Rojas, Pedro, 1985, La Huaca Huayurco, Jaén. In Historia de Cajamarca, Vol. 1, Arqueología, compiled by Fernando Silva Santiesteban et al., pp. 181–186. Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Cajamarca.Google Scholar
  39. Porras, Pedro I., 1978, Arqueología de la Cueva de los Tayos. Ediciones de la Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  40. Porras, Pedro I., 1980, Arqueología del Ecuador. Editorial Gallocapitán, Otavalo.Google Scholar
  41. Piperno, Dolores R. and Karen, E. Stothert, 2003, Phytolith evidence for Early Holocene Cucurbita domestication in southwest Ecuador. Science 299 (5609): 1054–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rehren, Thilo and Mathilde Temme, 1994, Pre-Columbian gold processing at Putushio, south Ecuador: the archaeometallurgical evidence. In Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts, edited by David A. Scott and Pieter Meyers, pp. 267–284. Getty Conservation Institute, Malibu, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Ruppert, Hans, 1983, Geochemische Utersuchungen an Türkis und Sodalith aus Lagerstätten und präkolumbischen Kulturen der Kordilleren. Berliner Beiträge zur Archäometrie. 8: 101–210. Berlin.Google Scholar
  44. Salazar, Ernesto, 1983, El hombre temprano en el Ecuador. In Nueva Historia del Ecuador, edited by Enrique Ayala Mora, Vol.1, pp. 73–128. Corporación Editora Nacional-Grijalbo, Quito.Google Scholar
  45. Salomon, Frank, 1980, Los Señores Étnicos de Quito en la Epoca de los Incas. Colección Pendoneros, 10. Instituto Otavaleño de Antropología, Otavalo.Google Scholar
  46. Shady, Ruth and Hernán Rosas La Noire, 1979, El Complejo Bagua y el sistema de establecimiento durante el Formativo en la sierra norte del Perú. Ñawpa Pacha 17: 109–142.Google Scholar
  47. Staller, John, 1994, Late Valdivia Occupation in Southern Coastal El Oro Province, Ecuador: Excavations at the Early Formative Period (3500-1500 B.C.): Site of La Ermerenciana. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.Google Scholar
  48. Stothert, Karen E., 1985, The preceramic culture of coastal Ecuador. American Antiquity 50: 613–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stothert, Karen E., 1988, La prehistoria temprana de la Peninsula de Santa Elena: Cultura Las Vegas. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana. Serie Monográfica, 10. Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
  50. Temme, Matilde, 1982, Excavaciones en el sitio precerámico de Cubilan (Ecuador). Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana. 2: 135–164. Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador, Guayaquil.Google Scholar
  51. Valdez, Francisco, 1987, Proyecto Arqueológico “La Tolita.” Museo del Banco Central del Ecuador. Editora Luz de América, Quito.Google Scholar
  52. Valdez, Francisco, 1992, Symbols, ideology, and the expression of power in La Tolita, Ecuador. In The Ancient Americas: Art from Sacred Landscapes, edited by Richard Townsend, pp. 229–243. The Art Institute of Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Valdez, Francisco, 2003, Peuplement initial en forêt tropicale humide. La côte nord-ouest de l’Amerique du Sud. In Peuplements Anciens et Actuels des Forêts Tropicales, edited by Alain Fromment and Jean Guffroy, pp. 267–283. IRD Éditions, Paris.Google Scholar
  54. Valdez, Francisco, 2006, Drenajes, camellones y organización social: usos del espacio y poder en La Tola, Esmeraldas. In Agricultura Ancestral: Camellones y Albarradas. Contexto Social, Usos y Retos del Pasado y del Presente, edited by Francisco Valdez, pp.189–223. Abya Yala, IFEA, IRD, BCE, Quito.Google Scholar
  55. Valdez, Francisco, Jean Guffroy, Geoffroy de Saulieu, Julio Hurtado, and Alexandra Yépez, 2005, Découverte d’un site cérémoniel formatif sur le versant oriental des Andes. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences de l’Institut de France. Palevol 4: 369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Villalba, Marcelo, 1988, Cotocollao: una aldea formativa del valle de Quito. Miscelánea Antroplógica Ecuatoriana, Serie Monográfica 2. Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  57. Villalba, Marcelo, 2001, Canasteros o comerciantes. In Catalogo de la Sala de Arqueología, pp. 58–70. Museo Nacional del Banco Central del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  58. Zeidler, James A., 1988, Feline, stone mortars, and Formative Period interaction spheres in the northern Andean area. Journal of Latin American Lore 14 (2): 243–283.Google Scholar
  59. Zeidler, James A. and Deborah M. Pearsall (eds.), 1994, Regional Archaeology in Northern Manabi, Ecuador, Vol. 1. Environment, Cultural Chronology, and the Prehistoric Subsistence in the Jama River Valley. Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology, 8. University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Valdez
    • 1
  1. 1.IRD/Institute de Recherche Pour le DéveloppementInstituto Nacional del Patrimonio CulturaEcuador

Personalised recommendations