Advertisement

Interactive Meta-Goal Programming: A Decision Analysis Approach for Collaborative Manufacturing

  • Hao W. Lin
  • Sev V. Nagalingam
  • Grier C. I. Lin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 5)

The benefits of collaborative manufacturing are widely recognized by both the industry and the academic world. However, the engagement of collaborative manufacturing for small and medium manufacturing enterprises (SMMEs) has proven to be a challenging task. One critical obstacle is that decision makers are constantly haunted by reoccurring complex decision making aiming toward the attainment of strategic objectives for collaborative manufacturing. The focus of this study is thus to develop an interactive meta-goal programming (IMGP) -based decision analysis framework to support the decision-making processes for collaborative manufacturing. The framework will have a critical positive impact on the operation of SMMEs engaging in collaborative manufacturing, as the accuracy and efficiency of their collaborative decision-making processes will be significantly improved.

Keywords

Decision Maker Priority Level Decision Outcome Goal Function Delphi Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Danilovic and M. Winroth (2005) A tentative framework for analysing integration in collaborative manufacturing network settings: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1-2): 141-158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Bilbao, D. del Pozo, D.J.M. Lopez, and I. Etxaniz (2004) The collaborative manufacturing approach. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics. IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.A. Simon (1977) The new science of management decision. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Turban, J.E. Aronson, and T.P. Liang (2005) Decision support systems and intelligent systems, 7th edition. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Aouni and O. Kettani (2001) Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2): 225-231.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Charnes and W.W Cooper (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.J. Schniederjans (1995) Goal programming: Methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, The Netherlands.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Caballero, F. Ruiz, M.V.R. Uria, and C. Romero (2006) Interactive meta-goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1): 135-154.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.R. Gardiner and R.E. Steuer (1994) Unified interactive multiple objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3): 391-406.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.L. Satty (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindo Systems Inc. (2006) Web site Lindo API. http://www.lindo.com/, accessed April 28, 2006.
  12. 12.
    M. Turoff and S.R. Hiltz (1995) Computer based Delphi processes. In M. Adler and E. Ziglio (eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publisher, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao W. Lin
    • 1
  • Sev V. Nagalingam
    • 1
  • Grier C. I. Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Manufacturing ResearchUniversity of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations