Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Movement Compatibility Study for Hong Kong Chinese

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 5))

  • 2197 Accesses

This paper reviews a study, which used real mechanical controls, of strength and reversibility of direction-of-motion stereotypes and response times for most common control–display configurations in the human–machine interface for Hong Kong Chinese. The effect of instructions for the change of display value and control plane on movement compatibility for various control–display configurations was analyzed with precise quantitative measures of strength and reversibility index of the stereotype. The results showed that the best control–display configuration was the rotary control–circular display combination. The performance of the rotary control–digital counter, rotary control–horizontal scale, and the fourway lever–circular display configurations were of comparable magnitude. The poorest configurations found in this study were the four-way lever–digital counter and the rotary control–vertical scale combinations. In general, subjects’ response times were found to be longer when there were no clear movement stereotypes. The results of this study provide significant implications for the industrial design of control panels used in human–machine interfaces for improved human performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H.Y. Kang and P.H. Seong (2001) Information theoretic approach to man-machine interface complexity evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31 (3): 163-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N.E. Loveles (1962) Direction-of-motion stereotypes: A review. Ergonomics, 5: 357-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K.F.H. Murrell (1965) Ergonomics: Man and his working environment. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.N. Sen and S. Das (2000) An ergonomics study on compatibility of controls of overhead cranes in a heavy engineering factory in west bengal. Applied Ergonomics, 31 (2): 179-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Warrick and W.F. Grether (1948) The effect of pointer alignment on the check reading of engine instrument panels. USAF AMC Memo. Rep. No. MCREXD, pp. 694-172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Brebner and B. Sandow (1976) The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Er-gonomics, 19: 571-580.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Petropoulos and J. Brebner (1981) Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary con-trols associated with linear displays: the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display. Ergonomics, 24: 143-151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.P. Wu (1997) Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19 (5): 353-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.R. Hoffmann (1990) Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereo-types for horizontally moving displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th An-nual Meeting, pp. 457-461.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.R. Hoffmann (1990) Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereo-types of three-dimensional display/control arrangements. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 462-466.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E.R. Hoffmann, C. Brown, and S. Morgan (1992) Stereotypes for operation of water taps. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc., pp. 63-71, Melbourne, Australia, 2-4 December, 1992, E. Hoffmann and O. Evans (eds.), Er-gonomics Society of Australia Inc., Downer, ACT, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.R. Hoffmann (1997) Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes-linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics, 40 (2): 199-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.J. Worringham and D.B. Beringer (1989) Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance. Ergonomics, 32 (4): 387-399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.J. Worringham and D.B. Beringer (1998) Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles. Ergonomics, 41 (6): 864-880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.R. Carey, C.L. Bogard, J.W. Youdas, and V.J. Suman (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility effects in a manual tracking task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81 (3): 155-1170.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Bosbach, W. Prinz, and D. Kerzel (2005) Movement-based compatibility in simple response tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17 (5): 695-707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Boles and R. Dewar (1986) Nationality and handeness differences in stereotypes for control movements. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Association of Canada, Richmond(Vancouver), BC, August 22-23, 1986, The Association, Rexdale, Ontario, pp. 87-90.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.K. Wong and J. Lyman (1988) Riding the wave of innovation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, October 24-28, 1988. The Human Fac-tors Society, Santa Monica, CA, 1: 30-34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Hotta, T. Takahashi, K. Takahashi, and K. Kogi (1979) Relations between direction-of-motion stereotypes for indicator controls. Journal of Human Ergology, 8: 47-58.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Hotta, T. Takahashi, K. Takahashi, and K. Kogi (1981) Relations between direction-of-motion stereotypes in living space. Journal of Human Ergology, 10: 73-82.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Hotta and M. Yoshioka (1988) Experiment on direction-of-motion stereotypes for indicator or figure control. Ergonomics International 88: Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the In-ternational Ergonomics Association, pp. 154-156, Sydney, Australia, 1-5 August 1988, A.S. Adams, R.R. Hall, B.J. McPhee, and M.S. Oxenburgh (eds.). Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Hotta and M. Yoshioka (1992) An experiment on direction-of-motion stereotypes in rotary control. Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 28 (2): 61-68.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Moray (1999) Advanced displays, cultural stereotypes and organisational characteristics of a control room nuclear safety: A human factors perspective. J. Misumi, B. Wilpert, and R. Miller (eds.). Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 97-112.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.J. Courtney (1998) Chinese response preferences for display-control relationships. Human Factors, 30(3): 367-372.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.J. Courtney (1994) Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics, 37: 417-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A.J. Courtney (1994) The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics, 37: 865-877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A.J. Courtney (1994) The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics, 37: 865-877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A.J. Courtney and A.H.S. Chan (1998) Testing Hong Kong stereotypes with a questionnaire. In Ergonomics practice and its theory. Proceedings of the 5th Pan-Pacific Conferences on Occupational Ergonomics, 21-24 July, 1998. Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 288-292.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.H.S. Chan, A.J. Courtney, and K.W.Y. So (2000) Circular displays with thumbwheels: Hong Kong Chinese preferences. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manu-facturing, 10:4: 453-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A.H.S. Chan, V.W.Y. Shum, H.W. Law, and I.K. Hui (2003) Precise effects of control posi-tion, indicator type, and scale side on human performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 22: 5-6: 380-386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R.F. Yu and A.H.S. Chan (2004) Comparative research on response stereotypes for daily oper-ation tasks of Chinese and American engineering students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98 (1): 179-191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. W.H. Chan and A.H.S. Chan (2003) Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display computer simulated test and real hardware test. Applied Ergonomics, 34: 61-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A.H.S. Chan and W.H. Chan (2006) Movement compatibility for circular display and rotary controls positioned at peculiar positions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36: 737-745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W.H. Chan and A.H.S. Chan (2006) Hardware test on movement compatibility for rotary control and digital display. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS) 20-22 June 2006, pp. 721-725.

    Google Scholar 

  35. W.H. Chan and A.H.S. Chan (2006) A study on movement compatibility for lever control and circular display with computer simulated test. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS) 20-22 June 2006, pp. 625-629.

    Google Scholar 

  36. W.H. Chan and A.H.S. Chan (2007) Strength and reversibility of movement stereotypes for lever control and circular display. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37: 233-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, W.H., Chan, A.H.S. (2008). A Comprehensive Movement Compatibility Study for Hong Kong Chinese. In: Chan, A.H.S., Ao, SI. (eds) Advances in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74905-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics