Advertisement

QCA Circuits for Robust Coplanar Crossing

  • S. Bhanja
  • M. Ottavi
  • S. Pontarelli
  • F. Lombardi
Part of the Frontiers in Electronic Testing book series (FRET, volume 37)

Quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) [16] may overcome some of the limitations of current technologies, while meeting the density foreseen by Moore's Law and the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). For manufacturing, molecular QCA implementations have been proposed to allow for room temperature operation; the feature of wire crossing on the same plane (coplanar crossing) provides a significant advantage over CMOS. Coplanar crossing is very important for designing QCA circuits; multi-layer QCA has been proposed [4] as an alternative technique to route signals, however it still lacks a physical implementation. At design level, algorithms have been proposed to reduce the number of coplanar wire crossings [9]. In QCA circuits, a reliable operation of coplanar crossing is dependent on the temperature of operation. Resilience to temperature variations due to thermal effects is also an important feature to consider for practical applications. A reduction in the probability of generating an erroneous signal is also of concern, hence, robustness must be addressed.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Full Adder Bayesian Network Circuit Arrangement Inverter Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Bhanja, M. Ottavi, S. Pontarelli, and F. Lombardi. Novel designs for thermally robust coplanar crossing in qca. IEEE Design and Testing in Europe, pp. 786-791, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Bhanja and S. Sarkar. Probabilistic modeling of qca circuits using bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 5(6):657-670, November 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Fijany, N. Toomarian, and K. Modarress. Block qca fault-tolerant logic gates. Technical report, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Gin, P. D. Tougaw, and S. Williams. An alternative geometry for quantumdot cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys., 85(12):8281-8286, June 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Hennessy and C. Lent. Clocking of molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 19(B):1752-1755, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Lent. Molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. Seminar, May 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Lent and P. Tougaw. Lines of interacting quantum-dot cells - a binary wire. Journal of Applied Physics, 74:6227-6233, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Lent and P. Tougaw. A device architecture for computing with quantum dots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(4):541-557, April 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. K. Lim, R. Ravichandran, and M. Niemier. Partitioning and placement for buildable qca circuits. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst., 1(1):50-72, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Mahler and V. A. Weberruss. Quantum Networks: Dynamics of Open Nanostructures. Springer Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Momenzadeh, M. Ottavi, and F. Lombardi. Modeling qca defects at molecular-level in combinational circuits. IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems DFT 2005, pages 208-216, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. M. Niemier, M. T. Kontz, M. J. Kogge. A design of and design tools for a novel quantum dot based microprocessor. In Design Automation Conference, pages 227-232, June 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Network of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Toth. Correlation and Coherence in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. D. Tougaw and C. S. Lent. Logical devices implemented using quantum cellular automata. Journal of Applied Physics, 75(3):1818-1825, Oct 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. D. Tougaw and C. S. Lent. Dynamic behavior of quantum cellular automata. Journal of Applied Physics, 80(15):4722-4736, Oct 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Walus, T. Dysart, G. Jullien, and R. Budiman. QCADesigner: A rapid design and simulation tool for quantum-dot cellular automata. IEEE Trans. on Nanotechnology, 3(1):26-29, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Bhanja
    • 1
  • M. Ottavi
    • 2
  • S. Pontarelli
    • 3
  • F. Lombardi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of South FloridaTampa
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBoston
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Ingegneria ElettronicaUniversità di Roma “Tor Vergata”Rome

Personalised recommendations