Organized Crime: Culture, Markets and Policies pp 165-181 | Cite as
Controlling Human Smuggling in the Netherlands: How the Smuggling of Human Beings Was Transformed into a Serious Criminal Offence
Just before the summer holidays of 2005, the Dutch National Criminal Investigation Service arrested ten members of a violent Chinese gang. All detainees were suspected of human smuggling, drug trafficking, extortion and liquidations. Police not only found large amounts of drugs and money, but also came across 24 automatic firearms, among which several Uzi’s. The Chinese gang members were allegedly heavily involved in smuggling Chinese from their home country through the Netherlands to the United Kingdom. Smuggled immigrants had to pay up to forty or even fifty thousand euros for their journey and according to the police the gang members were prepared to use violence towards defaulters. In addition, the police suspected some of the arrested gang members of being linked to previously apprehended snakeheads of other Chinese smuggling organizations (Meeus, 2005). Since the turn of the millennium,the Chinese in the Netherlands have acquired the reputation of being involved in professionally organized human smuggling through Eastern European countries to the UK, using safe houses in harbour cities such as Rotterdam. The involvement of Chinese immigrants with human smuggling in the Netherlands became explicitly visible through the “Dover case.” In this tragedy on June 18, 2000, 58 Chinese smuggled immigrants on their way to the United Kingdom suffocated in a refrigerated cargo container. The “Dover case” put the Netherlands on the map as a transit country for human smuggling although it wrongly focused solely on Chinese smugglers.
Keywords
Organize Crime Asylum Seeker Human Trafficking Illegal Immigrant Gang MemberPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Afrekeningen in Amsterdam en omstreken. (2004, 18 May). De Volkskrant, sectie Binnenland, p. 11.Google Scholar
- Bunt, H. G. van de. (2004). Organised crime policies in the Netherlands. In C. Fijnaut & L. Paoli (Eds.), Organised crime in Europe. Concepts, patterns and control policies in the European Union and beyond (pp. 677–716). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cornelius, W. (2004). Controlling immigration: The limits of governmental intervention. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. Martin, & J. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration. A global perspective (pp. 3–48). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- DNRI. (2005). Mensensmokkel in beeld, 2002–2003. Zoetermeer: KLPD-DNRI.Google Scholar
- Duyne, P., Kouwenberg, R. van, & Romeijn, G. (1990). Misdaadondernemingen: ondernemende misdadigers in Nederland. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
- DVB. (2004). Illegalennota. Aanvullende maatregelen voor het tegengaan van illegaliteit en de aanpak van uitbuiters van illegalen in Nederland. 5282929/04, April 23, 2004.Google Scholar
- Engbersen, G., & Leun, J. van der. (2001). The social construction of illegality and criminality. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 9, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Entzinger, H. (2002). Voorbij de multiculturele samenleving. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
- Faber, W. (2002). De macht over het stuur. Onderzoek besturingssysteem aanpak mensensmokkel. Oss: Faber Organisatievernieuwing.Google Scholar
- Feenstra, C. (1999). Trends in mensensmokkel. In W. de Bruijn, H. de Jong, H. Pauwels, & I. Voorhoeve (Eds.), Mensensmokkel naar Nederland. Een bundeling van lezingen over mensensmokkel in relatie tot de bestrijding van de (georganiseerde) criminaliteit (pp. 9–20). Gravenhage: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ghorashi, H. (2004). Ayaan Hirschi Ali: Daring or dogmatic? Debates on multiculturalism and emancipation in the Netherlands. Focaal–European Journal of Anthropology, 42, 163–169.Google Scholar
- Hesseling, R., & Taselaar, A. (2001). Asielmigratie en mensensmokkel. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 43(4), 340–349.Google Scholar
- IAM. (2000). Dreigingsbeeld 2000. Inzicht in aard en omvang van mensensmokkel in relatie tot Nederland. Zoetermeer: Informatie- en Analyse centrum Mensen-smokkel.Google Scholar
- IAM. (2002). Mensensmokkel in beeld 2000–2001. Zeist: Uitgeverij Kerckebosch BV.Google Scholar
- IND (Immigration and Naturalization Service). (1998). Keten in kaart: trends en ontwikkelingen in de vreemdelingenketen 1998. Den Haag: Ministerie van Jusititie, IND.Google Scholar
- Kalb, D. (2000). Localizing flows: Power, paths, institutions, and networks. In D. Kalb et al. (Eds.), The ends of globalization. Bringing society back in (pp. 1–29). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Kleemans, E. R., & Brienen, M. (2001). Van vriendendienst tot slangenkop. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 43(4), 350–359.Google Scholar
- Liempt, I. van, & Doomernik, J. (2006) Migrant’s agency in the smuggling process. The perspectives of smuggled migrants in the Netherlands. International Migration, 44(4), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald, J., & MacDonald, L. (1974). Chain migration, ethnic neighborhood formation, and social networks. In C. Tilly (Ed.), An urban world (pp. 226–235). Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
- Meeus, J. (2005). Politie pakt Chinese gangsters. De Volkskrant, 25 June 2005.Google Scholar
- Mensensmokkelaars brengen tweederde deel asielzoekers binnen. (1999, July 13). ANP, Binnenland (Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau).Google Scholar
- Middelburg, B. (1988). De mafia in Amsterdam. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
- Migration News 5–1–2005.Google Scholar
- Minderhoud, P. (2004). Het immigratiebeleid. In Han Entzinger en Jelle van der Meer (Eds.), Grenzeloze solidariteit: naar een migratiebestendige verzorgingstaat. Amsterdam: De Balie.Google Scholar
- Ministerie van Justitie en Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. (2001). Nota criminaliteitsbeheersing. Investeren in een zichtbare overheid. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
- Ministerie van Justitie, Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. (2002). Naar een veiliger samenleving, Den Haag, oktober 2002.: http://www.justitie.nl.
- Muus, P. (2004). The Netherlands: A pragmatic approach to economic needs and humanitarian considerations. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. Martin, & J. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration. A global perspective (pp. 263–288). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- NRC Handelsblad. (2005, January 20). Schiphol: 675 man vast wegens mensensmokkel.Google Scholar
- Parlementaire Enquetecommissie Opsporingsmethoden. (1996). Inzake opsporing. Den Haag: SDU.Google Scholar
- Pieters, B. (2006). Dutch criminal and administrative law concerning trafficking in and smuggling of human beings. In E. Guild & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), Immigration and criminal law in the European Union. The legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings (pp. 201–240). Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Price, C. A. (1963). Southern Europeans in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Salt, J., & Hogarth, J. (2000). Part I. Migrant trafficking and human smuggling in Europe: A review of the evidence. Migrant trafficking and human smuggling in Europe. A review of the evidence with case studies from Hungary, Poland and Ukraine. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
- Scheffer, P. (2000). Het multiculturele drama. NRC Handelsblad, 29 januari 2000: p. 6.Google Scholar
- Spener, D. (2004). Mexican migrant-smuggling: A cross-border cottage industry. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 5(3), 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staring, R. (2000). Flows of people: Globalization, migration, and transnational communities. In D. Kalb et al. (Eds.), The ends of globalization. Bringing society back in (pp. 203–215). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Staring, R. (2004). Facilitating the arrival of illegal immigrants in the Netherlands: Irregular chain migration versus smuggling chains. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 5(3), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staring, R. (2006). Controlling immigration and organized crime in the Netherlands. Dutch developments and debates on human smuggling and trafficking. In E. Guild & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), Immigration and criminal law in the European Union. The legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings (pp. 241–270). Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Staring, R., Engbersen, G., Moerland, H., et al. (2005). De sociale organisatie van mensensmokkel. Zeist: Kerckebosch.Google Scholar
- Statistics Netherlands 2006.Google Scholar
- Swaaningen, R. Van. (2004). Veiligheid in Nederland en Europa. Een sociologische beschouwing aan de hand van David Garland. Justitiële Verkenningen, 30(4), 9–23.Google Scholar
- Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1998–1999, 26345, nr. 1.Google Scholar
- Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 2003–2004, 29291, nr. 1, Uitvoering van internationale regelgeving ter bestrijding van mensensmokkel en mensenhandel.Google Scholar
- Tweede Kamer. (2003). Terugkeernota. Maatregelen voor een effectievere uitvoering van het terugkeerbeleid. Vergaderjaar 2003–2004, 29344, nr. 1.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2000). Protocol against the smuggling of migrants by land, sea and air, supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime. http://www.uncjin.org/Documents/Conventions/dcatoc/final_documents_2/convention_smug_eng.pdf.