In Context: Meaning, Materiality and Agency in the Process of Archaeological Recording
Text and Context
This chapter is concerned with archaeological ‘context sheets’, pro forma documents that are central to the way in which most British archaeological sites are recorded.1Whilst ostensibly unremarkable, they pose a number of interpretive challenges. As with documents more generally, the representational logic they engender seems to direct attention away from their own material and artefactual properties. Conceived as passive representations of the material properties of ‘the site’, their own material properties are paradoxically obscured, along with their capacity to cohere and elicit a variety of actions. Moreover, as literal embodiments of ‘context’, they seem to confound the anthropological assumption that context somehow exists outside or beyond the text itself.
A written record...
KeywordsMaterial Culture Archaeological Record Material World Archaeological Fieldwork Site Supervisor
In writing about archaeological fieldwork, my ‘informants’ have also been some of my most astute and perceptive critics. In particular, I wish to thank Chantal Conneller, Anwen Cooper, Duncan Garrow, Mark Knight and Lesley McFadyen, who have all contributed to the text at a number of levels. They are not, however, responsible for any shortcomings in the argument itself. The article was written with the support of a Leverhulme Early Career Research Fellowship.
- Bateman, J., 2006, Pictures, ideas and things: the production and currency of archaeological images. In Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, edited by M. Edgeworth. pp. 95–102. Altamira Press, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
- Chadwick, A., 1998, Archaeology at the Edge of Chaos. Further towards reflexive excavation methodologies, Assemblage Online (http://www.shef.ac.uk/assem/3/ 3.
- Cruickshank, J., 1998, The Social Life of Stories. University of Nebraska Press, London.Google Scholar
- Edgeworth, M., 2003, Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. Archeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Grint, K., and Woolgar, S., 1997, The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Harper, R., 1998, Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organizational Action. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Hassard, J., and Law, J., editors, 1999, Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Henare, A., Holbraad, M., and Wastell, S., 2007, Introduction: thinking through things. In Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically edited by A. Henare, M. Holbraad and S. Wastell, pp. 1–31. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Hodder, I., 1999, The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., 1987, Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., 1993, We Have Never Been Modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., 1999, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press, London.Google Scholar
- Law, J., 1994, Organizing Modernity. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Lucas, G., 2001a, Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Miller, D., 1987, Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Pellegram, A., 1998, The message in paper. In Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter, edited by D. Miller, pp. 103–20. University of Chicago Press, London.Google Scholar
- Reed, A., 2006, Documents unfolding. In Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge, edited by A. Riles, pp. 158–80. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Riles, A., 2006a, [Deadlines]: Removing the brackets on politics in bureaucratic and anthropological analysis. In Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge, edited by A. Riles, pp. 71–94. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Riles, A., 2006b, Introduction: in response. In Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge, edited by A. Riles, pp. 1–40. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Roskams, S., 2001, Excavation. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Sarris, G., 1993, Keeping Slug Women Alive: A Holistic Approach to American Indian Texts. University of Arizona Press, London.Google Scholar
- Smith, D., 1990, Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Strathern, M., 1990, Artefacts of history: events and the interpretation of images. In Culture and History in the Pacific, edited by J. Siikala, pp. 25–41. Finnish Anthropological Society, Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Strathern, M., 1996, Cutting the network, JRAI (n.s.) 2:517–35.Google Scholar
- Yarrow, T., 2006a, Perspective matters: traversing scale through archaeological practice. In Confronting Scale in Archaeology: Issues of Theory and Practice, edited by G. Lock and B. Molyneaux, pp. 77–87. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- Yarrow, T., 2006b, Sites of knowledge: different ways of knowing an archaeological excavation. In Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations, edited by M. Edgeworth, pp. 20–33. Altamira Press, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar